Comments on: 1. WMAP 5 year http://www.nonequilibrium.net/wmap-5-year/#utm_source=feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed For physicts by physicists Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:24:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dmitry http://www.nonequilibrium.net/wmap-5-year/comment-page-1/#comment-7 Dmitry Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:57:02 +0000 http://www.nonequilibrium.net/cosmology/wmap-5-year/#comment-7 Dear Instanton Thanks for visiting my blog. I am going to write an additional post on WMAP results, hope it will make the issue :) clearer. Dmitry. Dear Instanton
Thanks for visiting my blog. I am going to write an additional post on WMAP results, hope it will make the issue :) clearer.
Dmitry.

]]> By: Instanton http://www.nonequilibrium.net/wmap-5-year/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Instanton Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:22:00 +0000 http://www.nonequilibrium.net/cosmology/wmap-5-year/#comment-6 Hello From your post I did not get it - what is the improvement compared to 3Y data ? Hello

From your post I did not get it – what is the improvement compared to 3Y data ?

]]>