NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

96. Quintessence with w less than -1

APPLIED, ASTRO, HEP-TH/PH — By Dmitry Podolsky on November 14, 2008 at 12:50 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

In another very interesting recent paper on quintessence the Italian Team (Creminelli, D’Amico, Norena, Vernizzi – and warmest regards from Helsinki if you read it, Filippo 96. Quintessence with w less than  1 ) is trying to construct an reliable example of QFT that behaves like the quintessence with ?ghost-like? effective equation of state 96. Quintessence with w less than  1.

(If you want first two know what quintessence is, kindly read my recent post on quintessence realized on string theory landscape, where I try to explain the basics.)

Using the word ?reliable? in the first sentence I mean the following. If quintessence is a QFT, this QFT should naturally behave as hydrodynamics at very large scales ? the only scales where its behavior really interests us (since it mimics dark energy). This ideal hydrodynamics (viscosity is irrelevant at cosmological scales) can be characterized by two quantities: one is the effective equation of state (EOS) 96. Quintessence with w less than  1 and the other is the speed of sound 96. Quintessence with w less than  1. One can say that the first quantity governs the background, homogeneous, dynamics of the quintessence field, while the second one shows how perturbations in the quintessence field behave.

Note that the case of cosmological constant 96. Quintessence with w less than  1 corresponds to an imaginary speed of sound, since 96. Quintessence with w less than  1 and 96. Quintessence with w less than  1, and corresponding perturbations should grow without bound due to the gradient instability.

Generally, according to a very old very well known statement, if the EOS parameter 96. Quintessence with w less than  1 and the speed of sound is real (or speed of sound is imaginary and EOS is larger than -1), the corresponding theory has a ghost-like instability and is therefore badly defined (see the Fig. below). The Italian Team is arguing that this is not actually so!

96. Quintessence with w less than  1

They ask: what actually prevents us to introduce higher derivative terms in the QFT Lagrangian that will stop developing gradient instability (actually, the Team has earlier constructed a formalism for analyzing cosmological perturbations in theories with higher order gradient terms), so the QFT will be free of gradient and ghost-like instabilities in the end.

On the other hand, if we consider cosmological scales, higher order gradient terms are not important (they are suppressed by additional powers of 96. Quintessence with w less than  1), but of course due to their presence the gradient instability is cured at all scales. This leads to the conclusion that long wave length part of the QFT actually behaves as k-essence, i.e., theory with 96. Quintessence with w less than  1 and zero speed of sound for long wave length modes we are interested in.

Higher derivative terms become important also at cosmological scales if one gets really close to the bound 96. Quintessence with w less than  1 corresponding to exact cosmological constant. In this limit, QFT lagrangian reduces to the ghost condensate theory (in turn equivalent to a modification of gravity).

What remains to be understood (and what is actually interesting, I think) is how rapidly does the quintessence cluster in the model used by the authors. What we know for sure is that dark energy does not cluster at all at scales smaller than the cosmological horizon. However, gradient instability (even in the presence of higher order gradient terms curing it) may lead, I expect, to some clustering at smaller scales as well.

0 Comments

You can be the first one to leave a comment.

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.