I mean the process( time sequense) of the gluing of primitive tree diagrams( step by step).
In result is appearing the “big diagram” (with loops).
The “big diagram” increases and represents RG flow.
This is image of ergodic limit.
But I suppose a more interesting behaviour in pre-ergodic phase:
phase transitions, intermittency, memory…

P.S.
In my opinion you too strict in terminology.
It was my attempt to imagine this domain in more familiar form.
Math in my paper.

At any rate, it is absurd to say that these processes have nothing to do with atoms. Viscosity and everything that follows from it is a process resulting from the interactions of atoms, and the size and other properties of atoms determine all the relevant macroscopic quantities.

After all, it is no coincidence that the bound on viscosity – the value for perfect fluids – is proportional to the entropy density, which is pretty much close to the atomic density. In other words, viscosity is at most just a few orders of magnitude from the density of atoms. Your thinking about these issues is stuck somewhere in the 18th century. In the real world, those classical idealizations have their limits, and the more you study things that change on short distance scales, the more important the atomic structure matters. You may be trying to solve an interesting math problem (not sure about your methods) but it is known not to be a fully relevant problem for physics.

Second, all the amateur demagogists you list are far-left ideologues, pretty much communists. I don’t know how you could possibly link Western culture to any of these people, especially the ultracommunist bitch Hossenfelder. She has nothing to do with Western values whatsoever and if her country were correlated to her ideas, she should certainly live in North Korea.

I attribute it to you being strongly influenced by Lenin’s (or any other communist’s) writings – one can compare Lenin’s conversation techniques to yours and find many surprising similarities. I think that is the main reason why you hate communism so much – it poisoned your brain to the level you cannot really overcome it.

Cheers,
Dmitry.

please stop talking nonsense

Because the number of hierarchies goes like the logarithm of the size in atomic units, it may be damn important to know where the description breaks down, i.e., how large atoms are.

Kolmogorov scaling breaks down at scale where viscosity becomes important. I think it would be useful for you to reread by posts on Kolmogorov turbulence or any other basic level book on it, since my posts don’t apparently go beyond the basic level. Viscosity is macroscopic parameter of the fluid, macroscopic in the same sense as, say, temperature. Different atomic structures will lead to the very same Navier-Stokes in the IR.

Cheers,
Dmitry.

P.S. Accept you correction regarding Don Quijote, thanks.

I have to admit – your thinking is too advanced for me to understand it (basically, I fail to understand every single sentence of your comment). For example, what the heck is

condensat by Witten

?

Witten has talked about many different condensates, what condensate in particular do you have in mind? What does

gluing the Feynman tree diagram to the big horizon of the Universe

mean? How tree Feynman diagrams have anything to do with renormalization?

So far, my impression is that your picture cannot be right since renormalization is essentially UV (loop, not tree level!) effect, while horizon provides an IR cutoff.

Dmitry.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_culture

Czechia has always been a part of it.

the simplest reason why I think you’re naive in thinking that atoms can’t influence turbulence is that turbulence has a scale-invariant behavior and some processes occur “uniformly” at each scale of the hierarchy.

Because the number of hierarchies goes like the logarithm of the size in atomic units, it may be damn important to know where the description breaks down, i.e. how large atoms are. The only way why you can so easily humiliate these important issues that you are a superficial person who only repeats confusion emitted by others – but who is actually not able to neutrally and scientifically think about similar issues.

Please learn to spell Don Quijote.

Well, if Gorbachev schools taught you that Czechia belonged to the Eastern civilization space, I can only say that Gorbachev hasn’t improved much about the schooling of little Soviets like you.

Well, it’s always better to be a 12-year-old genius who is right in every respect than his obnoxious would-be stalinist teacher.

Best wishes
Lubos

The calculations of the observables(partition function) may be considered as a probe statistics:
an iterative process of
gluing the Feynman tree diagram to the big horizon of the Universe(in perturbative language).
By means of strong or weak glue depends on measure(scale).

Thus the measure is being generated.
The entropy is an effective dimension(central charge analog)of this measure.

The Measure consentration(condensat by Witten)may appears, for example, in case of moduli (meta)stabilization (in the
chamber in moduli space surrounded by walls of marginal stability).

In my approach there is a Gravity dual because of measure-entropy-geometry(effective curvature) relationships(numerical).

Also there is an intermittency behaviour.
Alike a laminar-turbulence chain in (aero)hydrodynamics.

It is interestingly to discuss(construct) the moduli of hydrodynamics flow. I was hear about entropy/viscosity ratio(or something like).

Cheers,
Max.

In reality, I have no idea. I think, there might be actually some connection but I’m not sure whether anybody is able to figure out this connection at the present moment. Gravity seems to have some intrinsic entropy associated with it in those particular problems where horizons naturally appear, and not-CFT – asymptotically free – quantum field theories (where coupling is running) might also probably have gravity duals. So what, you say? The answer is I don’t know

Cheers,
Dmitry.

Very like to behavior of the informational entropy in concentration measure regime.

Cheers,
Max.

Are you(both Dmitry and Lubos) joking?

Me – somewhat, Lubos – not sure What do you mean by “information-like” behavior?

Cheers,
Dmitry.