<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 227. Video of the day: Meissner effect in superconductors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonequilibrium.net/video-day-superconductors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/video-day-superconductors/</link>
	<description>Cosmology, turbulence, markets, non-equilibrium QFT and much more. No nonsense, just science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:49:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/video-day-superconductors/comment-page-1/#comment-5856</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1264#comment-5856</guid>
		<description>Agree, fixed. Somehow, when I wrote this, I was thinking about cuprates with [tex]T_c[/tex] higher than 100 K.

Cheers,
Dmitry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, fixed. Somehow, when I wrote this, I was thinking about cuprates with <img src='http://www.nonequilibrium.net/latexrender/pictures/0036ac1e1ae00ff6a59a729ecdb0ca91.gif' title='T_c' alt='T_c' align=absmiddle/> higher than 100 K.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dmitry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tg</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/video-day-superconductors/comment-page-1/#comment-5850</link>
		<dc:creator>tg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 04:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1264#comment-5850</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

though, what you see is not really high T_c superconductor - the liquid that the guy uses seems to be liquid nitrogen

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If the coolant is indeed liquid nitrogen (boils at 77K) and it looks like it is, then I would think that it is indeed a high-Tc material. Otherwise one would be using something with much lower boiling temperature like liquid helium (4.22K).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>though, what you see is not really high T_c superconductor &#8211; the liquid that the guy uses seems to be liquid nitrogen</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If the coolant is indeed liquid nitrogen (boils at 77K) and it looks like it is, then I would think that it is indeed a high-Tc material. Otherwise one would be using something with much lower boiling temperature like liquid helium (4.22K).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/video-day-superconductors/comment-page-1/#comment-5833</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1264#comment-5833</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Do you have a more direct link?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, I don&#039;t - what I kept in mind is dual Meissner effect.

Cheers,
Dmitry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Do you have a more direct link?</p></blockquote>
<p>No, I don&#8217;t &#8211; what I kept in mind is dual Meissner effect.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dmitry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lubos Motl</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/video-day-superconductors/comment-page-1/#comment-5809</link>
		<dc:creator>Lubos Motl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1264#comment-5809</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s related in this video of mine

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOr1W_KCRg8

because it&#039;s about Liquid Nitrogen and the band that sings it is called the LHC which is where they collide confined quarks. :-)

Well, superconductivity is about a U(1) Higgs field, so any Higgsing - even electroweak one - is &quot;superconductivity&quot; and confinement is S-dual to that Higgsing in some pictures.

Do you have a more direct link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s related in this video of mine</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOr1W_KCRg8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOr1W_KCRg8</a></p>
<p>because it&#8217;s about Liquid Nitrogen and the band that sings it is called the LHC which is where they collide confined quarks. <img src='http://www.nonequilibrium.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Well, superconductivity is about a U(1) Higgs field, so any Higgsing &#8211; even electroweak one &#8211; is &#8220;superconductivity&#8221; and confinement is S-dual to that Higgsing in some pictures.</p>
<p>Do you have a more direct link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
