<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 241. Twitter updates for 2009-02-08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonequilibrium.net/twitter-updates-for-2009-02-08-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/twitter-updates-for-2009-02-08-2/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>For physicts by physicists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: tg</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/twitter-updates-for-2009-02-08-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5979</link>
		<dc:creator>tg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/twitter-updates-for-2009-02-08-2/#comment-5979</guid>
		<description>Understood your point on re-reading the paper, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Understood your point on re-reading the paper, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/twitter-updates-for-2009-02-08-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5952</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/twitter-updates-for-2009-02-08-2/#comment-5952</guid>
		<description>Hi Taru,

Density dependent part of specific heat is proportional [tex]T^{2p}[/tex], while density independent part - to [tex]T^{p}[/tex].

Cheers,
Dmitry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Taru,</p>
<p>Density dependent part of specific heat is proportional <img src='http://www.nonequilibrium.net/latexrender/pictures/1fbe4d90516c375f3c1938846cef20b6.gif' title='T^{2p}' alt='T^{2p}' align=absmiddle/>, while density independent part &#8211; to <img src='http://www.nonequilibrium.net/latexrender/pictures/97f002a7208ad798017b15b3eb74705b.gif' title='T^{p}' alt='T^{p}' align=absmiddle/>.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dmitry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tg</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/twitter-updates-for-2009-02-08-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5926</link>
		<dc:creator>tg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 05:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/twitter-updates-for-2009-02-08-2/#comment-5926</guid>
		<description>One very naive question regd. paper &quot;Zero Sound from Holography&quot; (third from bottom twitter update)--

The authors say that in their system, the specific heat goes like  T^{2p}  at low T in p spatial dimensions. This supposedly is the specific heat contribution from all the low energy modes in the system, whatever they may be. Now, at the same time they find a bosonic mode (zero sound) whose contribution to specific heat should separately be  T^{p} , or not?? Then at low T why doesn&#039;t the latter contribution dominate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One very naive question regd. paper &#8220;Zero Sound from Holography&#8221; (third from bottom twitter update)&#8211;</p>
<p>The authors say that in their system, the specific heat goes like  T^{2p}  at low T in p spatial dimensions. This supposedly is the specific heat contribution from all the low energy modes in the system, whatever they may be. Now, at the same time they find a bosonic mode (zero sound) whose contribution to specific heat should separately be  T^{p} , or not?? Then at low T why doesn&#8217;t the latter contribution dominate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

