NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

241. Twitter updates for 2009-02-08

Uncategorized — By Dmitry Podolsky on February 8, 2009 at 11:59 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.
  • How your brain figures out that God exists: http://twurl.nl/ysq64k
  • Drexler on nanosystems: http://tinyurl.com/byeojf
  • What if we will run out of gas? a talk by Goodstein (Caltech) in Perimeter Inst.: http://pirsa.org/09020006/
  • Which part of the brain the memory is stored in? http://jijr.com/m4M
  • Nature Nanotechnology on power of proteins: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.422
  • Holographic quantum liquid: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.110…..102.051602
  • Shorting neurons with nanotubes: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.424
  • Hydrodynamic object recognition – how sharks notice you, not just by smell 241. Twitter updates for 2009 02 08 http://link.aps.org/doi/10.110…..102.058104

3 Comments

  1. tg says:
    February 9, 2009 at 7:10 am

    One very naive question regd. paper “Zero Sound from Holography” (third from bottom twitter update)–

    The authors say that in their system, the specific heat goes like T^{2p} at low T in p spatial dimensions. This supposedly is the specific heat contribution from all the low energy modes in the system, whatever they may be. Now, at the same time they find a bosonic mode (zero sound) whose contribution to specific heat should separately be T^{p} , or not?? Then at low T why doesn’t the latter contribution dominate?

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      February 11, 2009 at 12:03 am

      Hi Taru,

      Density dependent part of specific heat is proportional T^{2p}, while density independent part – to T^{p}.

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply
  2. tg says:
    February 11, 2009 at 10:11 pm

    Understood your point on re-reading the paper, thanks!

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.