NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

339. Twistors: getting more formal

ASTRO, HEP-TH/PH — By Dmitry Podolsky on April 6, 2009 at 10:55 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

After discussing (or rather musing about) generalities related to twistor formalism, let me now get a bit more formal – I hope it will finally help you to understand what I was talking about in the previous posts 339. Twistors: getting more formal

As was mentioned before, the twistor space corresponding to 4-dimensional real Minkowski spacetime is a complex projective space 339. Twistors: getting more formal – that is, by definition we introduce complex coordinates 339. Twistors: getting more formal such that 339. Twistors: getting more formal and the points 339. Twistors: getting more formal and 339. Twistors: getting more formal are identified for arbitrary 339. Twistors: getting more formal.

It is possible to describe lines in 339. Twistors: getting more formal by a pair 339. Twistors: getting more formal, 339. Twistors: getting more formal for any 339. Twistors: getting more formal. The set of these straight lines therefore depends on four complex parameters. Conformal structure in twistor space is defined by the condition that the distance between any straight line 339. Twistors: getting more formal crossing a given line 339. Twistors: getting more formal and the line 339. Twistors: getting more formal itself is zero (therefore the line 339. Twistors: getting more formal belongs to the light cone with origin somewhere in 339. Twistors: getting more formal).

Let us consider a real hypersurface (called Hermitian quadric) given by the equation

339. Twistors: getting more formal.

It divides the twistor space 339. Twistors: getting more formal into two parts: the form 339. Twistors: getting more formal is positive in one part and negative in the other. The set 339. Twistors: getting more formal of all straight lines belonging to this Hermitian quadric depends only on 4 real parameters and therefore represents conformal compactification of Minkowski space. Cones of all lines from the set that cross the given line 339. Twistors: getting more formal are just light cones. If we want to get the usual Minkowski space, we need to choose a particular line 339. Twistors: getting more formal (for example, 339. Twistors: getting more formal, 339. Twistors: getting more formal) and remove all the lines belonging to the set 339. Twistors: getting more formal from the twistor space.

That’s how 4-dimensional flat space with Minkowski signature is embedded into the twistor space 339. Twistors: getting more formal… Euclidean space (339. Twistors: getting more formal) can be embedded into as follows. Consider a set of straight lines connecting points 339. Twistors: getting more formal and 339. Twistors: getting more formal. All these lines either do not intersect or coincide. This way we can divide 339. Twistors: getting more formal into classes of non-intersecting lines or introduce fibration in other words.

Finally, let us talk a bit about various symmetries associated with twistor space and various embeddings discussed above. First of all, the group of projective transformations of 339. Twistors: getting more formal space is 339. Twistors: getting more formal. It has a subgroup 339. Twistors: getting more formal which conserves the quadric 339. Twistors: getting more formal above. It therefore induces the group of conformal transformations of Minkowski space. If we want to keep the line 339. Twistors: getting more formal defined above fixed, the corresponding subgroup of the 339. Twistors: getting more formal group is nothing but Poincare group of Minkowski space. Finally, if we fix one more line not crossing 339. Twistors: getting more formal, we will get Lorentz group.

1 Comment

    Leave a Comment

    Click here to cancel reply.


    For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

    Login with Facebook:

    or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

    Trackback responses to this post

    • NEQNET: first two weeks of April | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena

    Related Posts

    • No Related Post
    • Comments
    • Login
    • Search
    • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
      January 31, 2012 14:01
    • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
      March 18, 2011 20:03
    • Relaunching NEQNET
      January 20, 2011 21:01
    • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
      June 20, 2009 19:06
    • Dynamics of space storm
      June 19, 2009 12:06
    • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
    • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
    • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
    • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
    • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
    • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
    • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
    • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
      Register,
      login with your NEQNET profile
      or login with Facebook:

      • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
        • 33 comments
      • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
        • 33 comments
      • The very meaning of socialism
        • 26 comments
      • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
        • 26 comments
      • Biocentrism: book review
        • 24 comments

    Facebook: Community

    Facebook: Your Friends

    Google Friend Connect

    Links: Journals

    Links: Resources

    Links: Blogs

    • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
    Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.