NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement

APPLIED — By Dmitry Podolsky on April 17, 2009 at 9:05 am
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

I am currently keeping studying thermonuclear fusion and reactors a bit and, I should admit, I’m absolutely in love with HiPER and inertial confinement as an idea – it is so much more elegant than magnetic confinement used in Tokamaks… But before I’ll turn to the discussion of inertial confinement reactors, let me finish with generalities and trivialities (I’ll need them anyway for further reference).

Every thermonuclear reactor is characterized by its fusion energy gain factor 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement equal to the ratio of reactor’s power to power spent for starting and sustaining the nuclear reaction. So far, we were unable to build a reactor with 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement, while what be useful for us in practise to achieve is the gain factor of the order of 20. Why we were so unsuccessful so far (Russians started working on thermonuclear fusion and building Tokamaks from 1960s)? We will discuss associated difficulties in one of the next posts.

It seems that the simplest option for us is to build a reactor working on d-t fuel, the corresponding reaction rate being larger than for any other thermonuclear reactions. The next (but actually more attractive as you’ll see below) possibility is a reactor working on d-358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement fuel. In this case, neutrons can only appear in subsequent d-d and d-t reactions, and associated danger is much lower compared to the usual fission nuclear reactors: there is no need to develop the whole industry dealing with radioactive waste, etc. The main problem associated with d-358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement thermonuclear reactor is almost absolute absence of 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement in Nature. It sounds somewhat funny but we may end up delivering it to Earth from Moon…

(the guy on the video is way too funny 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement )

Ok, finished with generalities and trivialities 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement and let me now get to the interesting part and explain how inertial confinement works physically. There is a lot of interesting and simple associated physics, so probably explanations will take couple of posts but, I think, it’s definitely worth studying.

Contrary to usual idea of magnetic confinement of plasma, plasma in reactors with interial confinement is not really confined – it propagates freely. Conditions for the thermonuclear reaction to start are achieved on the stage of compression of plasma. The systems with inertial confinement are initially designed to be out of equilibrium 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement (a time scale 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement exists characterizing inertial confinement).

Imagine that the plasma of d, t nuclei and electrons with densities 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement, 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement, 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement correspondingly is localized within the sphere of radius 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement. The number of d-t fusion reactions in the corresponding spherical volume is given by

358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement,

where 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement for given species (d or t). (The d-t reaction rate 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement is given as usual by averaging over Maxwell distribution for the given temperature 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement of plasma). Since plasma is not confined, reaction can be only effective during a characteristic kinematic time

358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement,

where 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement is the velocity of the plasma during the state of compression. In the very first approximation, we can estimate it as a speed of sound in the plasma

358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement

Therefore, a characteristic number of d (or t) nuclei that entered the reaction as

358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement.

Using the ideal gas approximation for plasma we find

358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement,

where 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement is atomic number of ions in plasma and 358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement is their mass. Then,

358. Thermonuclear reactors. Inertial confinement.

To be continued…

3 Comments

    Leave a Comment

    Click here to cancel reply.


    For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

    Login with Facebook:

    or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

    Trackback responses to this post

    • Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena
    • Thermonuclear fusion: list of posts | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena
    • NEQNET: Last two weeks of April | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena

    Related Posts

    • No Related Post
    • Comments
    • Login
    • Search
    • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
      January 31, 2012 14:01
    • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
      March 18, 2011 20:03
    • Relaunching NEQNET
      January 20, 2011 21:01
    • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
      June 20, 2009 19:06
    • Dynamics of space storm
      June 19, 2009 12:06
    • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
    • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
    • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
    • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
    • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
    • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
    • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
    • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
      Register,
      login with your NEQNET profile
      or login with Facebook:

      • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
        • 33 comments
      • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
        • 33 comments
      • The very meaning of socialism
        • 26 comments
      • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
        • 26 comments
      • Biocentrism: book review
        • 24 comments

    Facebook: Community

    Facebook: Your Friends

    Google Friend Connect

    Links: Journals

    Links: Resources

    Links: Blogs

    • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
    Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.