<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 340. Thermonuclear fusion: some basic facts about thermonuclear reactions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonequilibrium.net/thermonuclear-fusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/thermonuclear-fusion/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>For physicts by physicists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Thermonuclear fusion: list of posts &#124; NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/thermonuclear-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-8187</link>
		<dc:creator>Thermonuclear fusion: list of posts &#124; NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=3167#comment-8187</guid>
		<description>[...] Thermonuclear fusion: some basic facts about thermonuclear reactions, where I start explaining why such phenomenon as thermonuclear fusion can even take place in Nature [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thermonuclear fusion: some basic facts about thermonuclear reactions, where I start explaining why such phenomenon as thermonuclear fusion can even take place in Nature [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NEQNET: first two weeks of April &#124; NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/thermonuclear-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-8038</link>
		<dc:creator>NEQNET: first two weeks of April &#124; NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=3167#comment-8038</guid>
		<description>[...] Thermonuclear fusion: some basic facts about thermonuclear reactions. Since I&#8217;ve included thermonuclear fusion in my list of 10 most important open problems in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thermonuclear fusion: some basic facts about thermonuclear reactions. Since I&#8217;ve included thermonuclear fusion in my list of 10 most important open problems in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjen Dijksman</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/thermonuclear-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-7910</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjen Dijksman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=3167#comment-7910</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that tip. I also found info in chapter 1 of Introduction to nuclear and particle physics, by Ashok Das.

I&#039;ve been reading lately much early original work in electricty and magnetism pioneering (Franklin, Coulomb, Faraday, Orsted, Ohm, Maxwell, etc.) and watching some Walter Lewin lectures and other demos on web. I was intrigued by the fact that experiments on Coulomb repulsion were always done with negatively charged objects. I&#039;ve not yet found any experiment on Coulomb repulsion with positive charges, older than Rutherford, Geiger and Marsden. So I was wondering if one has ever measured an undistorted Coulomb repulsion between positive charges. If not, it could be of interest to modelize proton-proton repulsion without starting from Coulomb interaction.

Greet,
Arjen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that tip. I also found info in chapter 1 of Introduction to nuclear and particle physics, by Ashok Das.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been reading lately much early original work in electricty and magnetism pioneering (Franklin, Coulomb, Faraday, Orsted, Ohm, Maxwell, etc.) and watching some Walter Lewin lectures and other demos on web. I was intrigued by the fact that experiments on Coulomb repulsion were always done with negatively charged objects. I&#8217;ve not yet found any experiment on Coulomb repulsion with positive charges, older than Rutherford, Geiger and Marsden. So I was wondering if one has ever measured an undistorted Coulomb repulsion between positive charges. If not, it could be of interest to modelize proton-proton repulsion without starting from Coulomb interaction.</p>
<p>Greet,<br />
Arjen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/thermonuclear-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-7899</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=3167#comment-7899</guid>
		<description>You are probably interested in some really old QM stuff (1930s) - check out the book &quot;The completion of quantum mechanics&quot; by Mehra &amp; Rechenberg, p. 960 and further. 

If you want to know more about tests of Coulomb interaction, you&#039;ll have to increase projectile energy, so that particles become relativistic. There are corrections to Coulomb law that come from renormalization (basically effective charge is a slow function of r). This was checked in 1950s-1960s.

Cheers,
Dmitry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are probably interested in some really old QM stuff (1930s) &#8211; check out the book &#8220;The completion of quantum mechanics&#8221; by Mehra &amp; Rechenberg, p. 960 and further. </p>
<p>If you want to know more about tests of Coulomb interaction, you&#8217;ll have to increase projectile energy, so that particles become relativistic. There are corrections to Coulomb law that come from renormalization (basically effective charge is a slow function of r). This was checked in 1950s-1960s.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dmitry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjen Dijksman</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/thermonuclear-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-7886</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjen Dijksman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=3167#comment-7886</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been looking for papers with experiments with slow protons, showing how the Coulomb repulsion behaves increasing the energy. I couldn&#039;t find some. Could you help? Thanks. 

Greetings,
Arjen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking for papers with experiments with slow protons, showing how the Coulomb repulsion behaves increasing the energy. I couldn&#8217;t find some. Could you help? Thanks. </p>
<p>Greetings,<br />
Arjen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/thermonuclear-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-7883</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=3167#comment-7883</guid>
		<description>Hi Arjen,

&lt;blockquote&gt;Is that Coulomb repulsion experimentally verified (for example with slow protons)?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh yes, and at much smaller distances too - like in experiments involving QED precision measurements.

&lt;blockquote&gt;So yes, what?s the procedure?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sorry, I did not understand your question.

Cheers,
Dmitry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Arjen,</p>
<blockquote><p>Is that Coulomb repulsion experimentally verified (for example with slow protons)?</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh yes, and at much smaller distances too &#8211; like in experiments involving QED precision measurements.</p>
<blockquote><p>So yes, what?s the procedure?</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry, I did not understand your question.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dmitry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjen Dijksman</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/thermonuclear-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-7873</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjen Dijksman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=3167#comment-7873</guid>
		<description>Hello Dmitry,

The figure shows a nice smooth Coulomb repulsion curve for radius &gt; 20 fm. Is that Coulomb repulsion experimentally verified (for example with slow protons)? So yes, what&#039;s the procedure?

Kind regards,
Arjen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Dmitry,</p>
<p>The figure shows a nice smooth Coulomb repulsion curve for radius &gt; 20 fm. Is that Coulomb repulsion experimentally verified (for example with slow protons)? So yes, what&#8217;s the procedure?</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />
Arjen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thermonuclear fusion. Coulomb barrier and reaction rates &#124; NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/thermonuclear-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-7870</link>
		<dc:creator>Thermonuclear fusion. Coulomb barrier and reaction rates &#124; NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=3167#comment-7870</guid>
		<description>[...] This post is the next in the series devoted to the discussion of our main energy source in the 22 century - thermonuclear fusion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post is the next in the series devoted to the discussion of our main energy source in the 22 century &#8211; thermonuclear fusion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed Rothwell</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/thermonuclear-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-7844</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed Rothwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=3167#comment-7844</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia is not a valid source of information about cold fusion. I suggest you read peer-reviewed journal papers and papers issued by Los Alamos, the U.S. Navy and BARC instead. See:

http://lenr-canr.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia is not a valid source of information about cold fusion. I suggest you read peer-reviewed journal papers and papers issued by Los Alamos, the U.S. Navy and BARC instead. See:</p>
<p><a href="http://lenr-canr.org" rel="nofollow">http://lenr-canr.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

