NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

325. Scientist’s gadgets: desktop software

Uncategorized — By Dmitry Podolsky on March 28, 2009 at 12:05 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

Desktop software? What is this supposed to mean? – you may ask.

Well 325. Scientists gadgets: desktop software if you are a fellow scientist – theoretician, to be more precise – you know very well how much time we usually spend in front of our computers. Once upon a time I have tried to make a personal estimation in my particular case and found something like 14 hours including work and various useless crap like reading SPAM. This is ridiculous. It is in our very best interests to maximally optimize this time spent in front of a computer, so that we don’t repetitively deal with meaningless tasks, finish meaningful work as early as possible and enjoy the company of our wives/girlfriends (as well as other family members 325. Scientists gadgets: desktop software ).

One thing which, as I noticed, is rarely used/acknowledged by geeks like us is the desktop. Actually, my desktop was completely empty for several years – I just couldn’t get the slightest idea what can it be used for. I even removed Recycle Bin icon using Windows Registry 325. Scientists gadgets: desktop software I tried Mac (actually, we bought Mac Mini home – that’s now Ganna’s computer) and found that Mac’s desktop is absolutely same useless kind of crap.

The situation changed this year, when I applied for BumpTop private beta and was one of the lucky ones who were approved. The change is drastic – in fact, right now I keep all my projects I am currently working on right on the desktop and find it rather convenient, definitely saving lots and lots of my time.

The reason is that it adds physics to your desktop. Here is excerpt from the New York Times review of BumpTop:

…icons behave a lot more like actual sheets and bundles of paper. As you drag them around the screen, they tumble and pile up. They collide with other icons, tumbling and shoving them pell-mell out of the way.

You can drag a dotted line around a group of icons to stack them into piles, which you can then click through, flip through, or spread out like a deck of cards. You can then add another icon to a pile by tossing it with your mouse, and grinning as it flies to the top of the pile as though you have perfect aim.

You can make an especially important icon bigger by dragging it; once it’s bigger, it’s also heavier, so that it pushes other icons out of the way. You can even crease and fold icons, as though to dogear them. You can even crumple icons up and toss them into a corner of the screen.

The desktop, meanwhile, looks like the inside of a box?and you can actually pin things up on the walls of it, or make shelves.

If you want to take a look at this physics yourselves, here is the TED talk by Anand Agarawala, creator of BumpTop, which nicely demonstrates almost all incorporated features:

What else to say? BumpTop is especially good on Tablets, since it was initially written for them (see this somewhat outdated video from 2006):

Surprisingly, after all these years of development BumpTop is still in the Private Beta stage. If you want to play/work with it, you can get your invitation code by applying at bumptop.com – which means that you will have to wait for several months as it was in my case.

Alternatively, if you want to try BumpTop and are not willing to wait too long, you can do the following 325. Scientists gadgets: desktop software Currently, I have two invite codes for BumpTop left. If you subscribe to NEQNET email updates and express your wish to get into BumpTop private beta in comments to this post, you will enter a mini-contest. On Wednesday, I’ll check out the list of my subscribers and people who left comments after this post, Ganna – run a little random integer generator and two winners – get my invite codes by email.

If you are already subscribed and want to enter, just leave a comment to the post. Finally, RSS subscription will not do since I need your email to enter it into BumpTop form.

In the mean time, if you cannot wait to get a nice science desktop, here is another nice one for you (by the way, I currently use it together with BumpTop 325. Scientists gadgets: desktop software ) Just click on the picture to get a larger (1024×768) version:

325. Scientists gadgets: desktop software

Via Michael Anissimov.

22 Comments

  1. theoreticalminimum says:
    March 28, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    Hi Dmitry,
    It would be great if I could get one of the invite codes! Bumptop looks really cool, and I want to try it on my tablet pc :)
    Thanks!

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      March 28, 2009 at 9:47 pm

      Hi TM,

      you are in ;-)

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply
  2. Moshe says:
    March 28, 2009 at 6:34 pm

    I think the next logical step in organizing large amount of information is moving away from any model of organization that includes hiding away things in neatly organized folders, or in this case the desktop. This manual organization is pretty primitive, and always time consuming. Rather, if files are tagged efficiently enough, searching for them becomes the easiest way to access them. The current OS X seems to do that pretty efficiently (though it can still be improved) – if you want to access a certain file, it is fastest to search for it using spotlight, even if you know exactly where it is.

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      March 28, 2009 at 10:00 pm

      Hi Moshe

      I thought this way for almost a year but one should be practical, shouldn’t one? To make a search, you need to know the part of the answer, that is – key phrase or key word :-) Unfortunately, way too often I, say, download seemingly interesting papers from Arxiv to read them later or at least to quickly go through. The total amount of papers per day in this category is about 10-20 (from different Arxiv subcategories). It is virtually impossible for me to remember their titles/abstracts (except maybe 2-5 most interesting ones) on the same evening or the next morning. I should admit that I have a very bad memory. So, Spotlight or Google Desktop Search will not help me much in this situation.

      The trivial solution is to download them on the Desktop :-) Another thing which I keep on my Desktop is my current work project and related papers I attach to it. There are usually many of them (say, all papers to be included into bibliography), and again I may forget a title/abstract/the bare fact that I need to acknowledge a given paper in the bibliography.

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply
  3. GregDMack says:
    March 28, 2009 at 11:45 pm

    Looks like a great way to organize all the massive information that gets collected on my Desktop (since I don’t know where else to functionally put it, ha!).

    Greg

    There you go, Dmitry!

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      March 28, 2009 at 11:52 pm

      You are in, Greg :-)

      Reply
  4. Moshe says:
    March 29, 2009 at 4:08 am

    Alright, different people, different tastes. I think if I found a thousand unsorted files on my desktop (especially when I’m looking for something) I’d conclude there has been some virus attack and I need to reinstall the OS.

    Reply
  5. Lubos Motl says:
    March 29, 2009 at 9:32 am

    I’ve seen it 3 years ago or so and it’s pretty as a game.

    But let me admit, I am probably as conservative as Moshe. There are only 20 icons on my PC desktop, most of which are reminders to do something.

    So my attempts are actually to organize the real desktop on my desk according to the old-fashioned Windows Vista desktop where things don’t pile and crash into each other. :-)

    But maybe it’s the way to go. But I happen to go in the opposite direction. For example, I began to use keyboard shortcuts extensively for all kinds of programs, keywords in Chrome for all kinds of search engines and individual pages, etc.

    Reply
  6. Jonathan says:
    March 29, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    For opening programs and finding files I use Quicksilver. You can run any application with a second or two and can jump into folders just as fast.

    These days I organise my papers with Papers (wonderful program, terrible name!): mekentosj.com/papers. Great piece of software, the only problem currently being that the initial setup can take a little while (things may become more automatic in the next version). Perhaps I invested an hour or two, but it’s absolutely worth it for the flexibility it allows you in the end.

    For tracking my productivity I downloaded rescuetime, which is a nice little app that lets you know how much time your spending/wasting on useful/useless applications.

    The other indispensable application (other than the ones I actually use to do my work) is dropbox, which allows me to sync the files I’m working on in the office with those I’m working on with my laptop at home.

    J

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      March 29, 2009 at 9:25 pm

      Hi Jon,

      thanks for sharing your experience, I heavily use Quicksilver on our Mac, even decided to install its equivalent for Windows (called Launchy) on my Tablet and never regretted that.

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply
  7. Moshe says:
    March 29, 2009 at 6:36 pm

    Lubos, I’m not sure “conservative” is the right adjective for this, but I have no icons whatsoever on my desktop (I usually have rotating display of some art, so the desktop is not completely useless). There are much better ways to remind myself of things, or to be able to access them quickly, than cluttering my space. You may also guess correctly that my actual desk is not cluttered with actual paper.

    I second Jonathan’s enthusiasm for “papers”, and let me add “NoteTaker”, which already looks like an optimal solution for organizing notes, papers, and any other piece of information, in any way you find convenient.

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      March 29, 2009 at 9:20 pm

      Dear Lubos and Moshe,

      but I have no icons whatsoever on my desktop

      My desktop was in the same form for a very long time as I explained in the post – but that’s just because I did not really understand what is it for and how to use it :-)

      ou may also guess correctly that my actual desk is not cluttered with actual paper.

      Yes, that’s the root of the difference – because my actual desk is always way too loaded, and BumpTop just allows me to resemble it on my Tablet ;-)

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply
  8. unnuagedecole says:
    March 29, 2009 at 7:03 pm

    Looking for news from Bumptop release this winter, I stumbled upon this – stunning-do-not-miss
    TED Demo from Jeff HAN
    “Unveiling the genius of multi-touch interface design”

    Enjoy! :)

    Reply
  9. unnuagedecole says:
    March 29, 2009 at 7:17 pm

    I pretty much understand different points here.
    I’ll have a try! Saw Bumptop in the winter and was looking forward to get a chance, since…

    I too always end up forgetting file names, but very visual me rarely forgets the ‘where’ in whereabouts.

    Also, I suggest you guys all check on stunning TED demo from Jeff Han Unveiling the genius of multi-touch interface design.

    http://www.ted.com/index.php/t.....creen.html

    Something about it…

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      March 29, 2009 at 9:13 pm

      Dear Un nuage d’ecole,

      you are in and thanks for the link!

      Dmitry.

      Reply
  10. Moshe says:
    March 29, 2009 at 9:48 pm

    Is there a good place to read about quicksilver? I’m new to the macworld, but from the little I’ve seen this seems to the kind of thing I could use.

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      March 29, 2009 at 10:05 pm

      http://docs.blacktree.com/quic.....uicksilver – the thing is even free. You can also take a look at tutorials section there.

      Reply
  11. Instanton says:
    March 30, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    hi Dmitry,

    Count me in ;-)

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      March 31, 2009 at 11:06 am

      Dear Instanton,

      you are in.

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

  • Articles about Windows 7 as of March 28, 2009 | The Lessnau Lounge
  • NEQNET: last two weeks of March | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena
  • Followup: BumpTop | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • On moduli stabilisation in heterotic orbifolds On moduli stabilisation in heterotic orbifolds
    April 24, 2012 09:04
  • A holographic model of the quantum Hall effect A holographic model of the quantum Hall effect
    April 19, 2012 09:04
  • Transdimensional Multiverse Measures Transdimensional Multiverse Measures
    April 18, 2012 11:04
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Neeta Mohla: Hello, Dr. Dmitry I'm a science enthusiast and read yr review of biocentrism. I've been sceptical on both sides an...
  • Momchil: I want to ask the experts about an apparent confusion, that appears in many papers on the Unruh effect. As you stat...
  • Paul: Excellent list! how lucky you are to be involved in the effort to solve some of these. On time, I question its re...
  • philbert: Simple illustration and may apply to mixed layer boundary layers, how about the stable and other types of boundary ...
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 34 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 25 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.