59. Eye on Arxiv: Quantum corrections to eta/s

I decided to turn the de Sitter discussion off for a moment, it would be more appropriate to return to it after the paper is ready anyway :-) Hopefully, it will not take too much time for you to see it in ArXives.

Today I want instead to briefly discuss the paper “Quantum corrections to eta/s” by Myers et al.

As many of you are well aware of, in principle, AdS/CFT correspondence allows to understand (in the very first, rough, approximation) the non-equilibrium properties of the quark-gluon plasma. When I mention the word “non-equilibrium”, I actually do not mean dynamical properties of the plasma far away from the thermal equilibrium, but the regime where linear response analysis can be actually applied.

Although applying linear response to the strongly coupled QG plasma naively does not sound very physical, the nature turns out to work in such a way that very soon after the collision of two heavy nuclei (Au-Au, for example) dynamical equilibrium is reached in the sense that effective equation of state in the QG plasma is well settled down towards its equilibrium value. Although the real thermal equilibrium is very far from being achieved, the QG plasma is in the state which can be called “prethermalization”. In practice, prethermalization means that only UV part of the overall spectrum is relatively far from the thermal one, but we do not care about it much since IR low energy part interesting for us is well under control (for example, spectrum is power law like in turbulence or exsibits thermal behavior with some effective temperature T_{\rm eff}, which is a slowly varying function of scale).

Anyway… in the “prethermalization” state one can apply linear response to understand behavior of non-equilibrium QFT correlators. This behavior is very far from being trivial because a) we discuss the state with very large occupation numbers and b) theory is effectively at strong coupling (we are talking about length scales \gg\Lambda^{-1}_{\rm QCD}).

The latter issue however can be treated by means of AdS/CFT; namely, we map strongly coupled QG plasma to gravity degrees of freedom propagating on the AdS background. The fact that we are dealing with conformal N=4 SYM instead of confining YM without any SUSY and number of colors equal 3 somehow does not bother us much because:

1) plasma is at large temperature, where scaling behavior effectively looks similar to CFT one
2) well, 1/N_c corrections are actually important but let us forget about them for a moment and see how far we will be able to advance :-)

Applying AdS/CFT immediately gives rise to a very interesting result: so called shear viscosity bound. Namely, as it turns out, for any gauge theories with an Einstein gravity dual in the limit of a
large number of colours and large t Hooft coupling \lambda=g^2{}N_c\to\infty

\eta/s=\frac{1}{4\pi} (1)

and this result is claimed to be universal and even the lowest possible value of the shear viscosity in Nature (liquid He for example has larger shear viscosity).

As I said, finite ‘t Hooft and 1/N_c corrections are important, but their calculation is very far from trivial. In 2004 Starinets, Buchel and Liu have found the leading 1/\lambda correction -

\eta/s=\frac{1}{4\pi}\left(1+\frac{15\zeta{}(3)}{\lambda^{3/2}}\right)

(as you see, it is of the weak power law form, so is hardly negligible in practice; nevertheless, experiments show that real QCD QG plasma comes very close to the bound (1), so it is very interesting to understand why this happens).

In Myers et al. paper the leading 1/N_c correction is calculated for the first time. One has:

\eta/s=\frac{1}{4\pi}\left(1+\frac{15\zeta{}(3)}{\lambda^{3/2}}+\frac{5}{16}\frac{\lambda^{1/2}}{N_c^2}\right)

The result is calculated of course by writing higher order R corrections to the Einstein-Hilbert action (as you may remember, 1/\lambda corrections correspond to \alpha' corrections on the string theory side, while 1/N_c - to higher order terms in the Einstein-Hilbert action).

Rate this:
3.5 (2 people)
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • bodytext
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Facebook

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment, subscribe to the RSS feed or get new posts sent directly to your Inbox. If you are interested to know what I am doing right now, follow me on Twitter. The posts below are probably related to the subject of this one:

30. Eye on ArXiv: 30 Apr 2008 - Effective QFT for inflation
36. Eye on ArXiv: 6 May 2008 - Where does the cosmological perturbation theory actually break down?
28. Eye on ArXiv: 24 Apr 2008 - dS vacua in no-scale SUGRA; multifield DBI inflation
18. Eye on ArXiv: 15 Apr 2008 - Transplanckian physics, brane cosmology and holographic mesons
22. About decoherence in quasi de Sitter space

Comments

Hey!

I just listened to this awesome podcast about a recent performance merging string theory with dance on the Science and the City website. It even includes an interview with Jim Gates! Here’s the link: http://www.nyas.org/snc/podcastdetail.asp?id=1787

Rate this:
2.5

Hi, wonderfull blog, I still have had not time to read it properly (hopt to do it soon). Anyway, pity that now it is somewhat stopped, hope it will reborn somtime soon ;-).

I have a question that maybe you could (and want) to answer, related, ho think, to your areas of interst.

I have beguining to read more seriously about the landscape and the statistical approach to string vacua. If I understand right people are doig statistical counts (a la Bousso-Polchinsky) countging diferent vacua with certains desirable characteristic. Among them some have some diferent properties of maybe soon observable characteristics (the main example, I guess, the size of non-planckian extra dimensions). The idea shold be that if most of that vacua with the right cosmological constant (i guess the most important feature) have some big extra dimension it would be expected that we live in one of them.

But, and that?s the point, the count is statstistical in mathematical sense, not of statistical mechanics. I men, there are supperselection rules that forbide to make anstatistical ensemble out of the many diferent vacua so statistical mechanics doesn?t make too much sense, am I right?

I think that part of the solution are the “eternal inflation” scenaries, but I would like tobe if there are another possible viewpoints (and I think you could be the right people to answer about it). I hope not to be doing a too dumb question, or, worst, sme that you would have answered in the entires I have not had tiem to read.

Rate this:
2.5
Leave a comment


Science Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory