NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement

APPLIED — By Dmitry Podolsky on April 21, 2009 at 10:00 am
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

Last time I did not quite finish with the discussion of physics of inertial confinement, so let me continue…

An important parameter that characterizes plasma in reactors with inertial confinement is the ratio between the geometric size 364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement of the region where reactions take place and the mean free path 364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement of 364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement-particles. It basically determines the ability of thermonuclear reactions in the plasma to self-sustain – if 364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement particles are adsorbed faster, plasma is getting warmed up more effectively. In other words, one naturally would want to increase 364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement or decrease 364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement. How to do that?

We have:

364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement,

i.e., the ratio depends on the density of plasma in the beginning of the experiment and the characteristic size of the plasma 364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement (prefactor that we omitted also depends on temperature of the plasma non-trivially). Basically, at 364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement characteristic velocity of particles in plasma is about 364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement, and the fusion can be only effective at plasma densities of the order 364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement or larger. Such densities greatly exceed the ones we deal with in solid state physics, so one needs to really strongly compress plasma to make fusion possible.

Geometrically, the most convenient way to compress plasma is to deal with spherical samples. In this case, we have 364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement, so 364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement (geometrically, the fastest decrease with 364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement which is possible) and 364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement.

364. Thermonuclear reactors. More on inertial confinement

And that’s how a corresponding fuel microcapsule looks like (inside this capsule is d+t fuel)

It is also clear from the considerations above that we really want to keep the spherical symmetry intact during the whole compression stage – otherwise, the density of the fuel will not achieve maximal possible values. As it turns out, that is the main technical difficulty we face with when we try to start reaction of fusion in an inertial confinement reactor – Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities in the heated fuel lead to breakdown of spherical symmetry. That’s how the problem of thermonuclear fusion is related to the problem of turbulence, but let me leave the discussion of hydrodynamic instabilities to another post…

3 Comments

    Leave a Comment

    Click here to cancel reply.


    For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

    Login with Facebook:

    or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

    Trackback responses to this post

    • Inertial confinement - using lasers for compression | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena
    • Thermonuclear fusion: list of posts | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena
    • NEQNET: Last two weeks of April | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena

    Related Posts

    • No Related Post
    • Comments
    • Login
    • Search
    • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
      January 31, 2012 14:01
    • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
      March 18, 2011 20:03
    • Relaunching NEQNET
      January 20, 2011 21:01
    • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
      June 20, 2009 19:06
    • Dynamics of space storm
      June 19, 2009 12:06
    • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
    • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
    • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
    • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
    • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
    • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
    • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
    • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
      Register,
      login with your NEQNET profile
      or login with Facebook:

      • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
        • 33 comments
      • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
        • 33 comments
      • The very meaning of socialism
        • 26 comments
      • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
        • 26 comments
      • Biocentrism: book review
        • 24 comments

    Facebook: Community

    Facebook: Your Friends

    Google Friend Connect

    Links: Journals

    Links: Resources

    Links: Blogs

    • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
    Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.