NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

Notes on strongly coupled QCD in the continuum

HEP-TH/PH — By Dmitry Podolsky on June 11, 2009 at 10:15 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

By continuum here we mean using methods different from lattice QCD, which is currently our main instrument for quantitative understanding of QCD physics at strong coupling.

What can we actually do apart from lattice simulations to study properties of QCD in this regime? Not much really. As recent minireview paper by M. Pennington explains, one approach to the problem would be solving Schwinger-Dyson equations at strong coupling.

While coupling grows, we have more and more equations to deal with – which is a kind of apparent. Indeed, at very small coupling we have roughly three equations (not taking color/flavor index structure into account) – one for bosonic propagator (gluon), one for fermionic propagator (quark) and one for the boson-fermion vertex, see the fig. below.

Notes on strongly coupled QCD in the continuum

Note that solid lines here mean exact propagators, so if we need to unleash the power of perturbation theory (pardon my French), we need to write diagrammatic expansion for them as well. What we will find is that Schwinger-Dyson equation relates 3-point function (vertex) to 2,3 and 4-point functions – therefore, we need additional equation for the 4-point function which in turn has terms
containing 2,3,4 and 5-point functions etc. etc. ad infinitum.

If coupling is small, we might expect that the chain of these equations might be effectively closed (by, say, neglecting at some point contribution of 10-point function into Schwinger-Dyson equation for 9-point function) – after that we are turning on numerics and start getting results like large effective mass of quarks nearly massless in zero approximation (from experiment we know that current u and d quarks have masses < 10 MeV, while constituent quarks, partons, have masses as large as several hundred MeV, essentially, Notes on strongly coupled QCD in the continuum).

Will we get large parton mass this way? Not really – one can explicitly check that solutions of the corresponding Schwinger-Dyson (SD) equation give you Notes on strongly coupled QCD in the continuum as long as the (bare) coupling is small. On the other hand, if the bare coupling is larger than 1, there exist solutions of truncated SD equations that do feature parton mass Notes on strongly coupled QCD in the continuum, althogh bare mass is taken to be zero.

This shows that generation of large mass of constituent quark is a non-perturbative phenomenon. Is it the end of the story – i.e., is the theory absolutely untreatable in this regime? Yes and no. As it turns out, one can use renormalization group and rewrite Swinger-Dyson equations in terms of renormalized coupling, not the bare one. Second, gauge invariance (or Ward-Takahashi identities at the practical level) help to strongly reduce the number of Schwinger-Dyson equations one has to solve. On the other hand, taking properly gauge invariance into account also means further complications – for example, appearance of ghosts in diagrammatic expansions (using axial gauge you can get rid of ghosts but in a sense it reappears since gluon propagator now depends on two functions of momentum, not one).

0 Comments

You can be the first one to leave a comment.

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.