NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

131. Non-gaussianities from postinflationary universe

ASTRO, HEP-TH/PH — By Dmitry Podolsky on December 10, 2008 at 10:00 am
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

Mark Trodden and Alessandra Silvestri have recently released a paper about signatures of non-gaussianity from the post-inflationary early Universe.

The title of the paper is speaking for itself: one can immediately recall that CMB fluctuations can be generated from cosmic strings and other topological defects, i.e.,  they may be partially sourced by various phase transitions in the very early Universe. This is indeed what Mark and Alessandra consider – in particular, they focus on effects of textures.

What is the texture? Such things appear in models of particle physics with global symmetry group G broken down to a subgroup H in such a way that 131. Non gaussianities from postinflationary universe turns out to be non-trivial. One simple example is the linear sigma model with four scalar fields

131. Non gaussianities from postinflationary universe (1)

with pontental added

131. Non gaussianities from postinflationary universe (2).

The Largangian (1) has global SO(4) symmetry, which is broken by potential term (2) down to SO(3). The homotopy 131. Non gaussianities from postinflationary universe is

131. Non gaussianities from postinflationary universe,

i.e., non-trivial, so we expect appearances of topologically non-trivial field configurations (we will call them textures) in this model. (Basically, the reason of their appearance is that the mapping of the spatial infinity to the internal (group) space of the theory is non-trivial – spatial infinity is a sphere and SO(3) is a sphere.)

Why do these topologically non-trivial configurations influence primordial CMB? The reason is that CMB photons travel quite a bit from the last scattering surface to us. As we know, larger distances correspond to earlier stages of the evolution of our Universe, and CMB photons had to pass regions corresponding to a very early and hot Universe when textures were able to be created. (A texture is a very heavy structure, and it needs a lot of energy to be created. Sufficient energy is provided by extremely hot primordial plasma in the early Universe – immediately after reheating the temperature of this plasma may be as high as 131. Non gaussianities from postinflationary universe GeV – the GUT scale.)

Although textures are topologically stable in the Minkowski spacetime, they cease to be stable if one includes effects of gravity, leading to the collapse of the texture.  When the gradient energy related to the texture becomes large enough in the process of this collapse, the texture dissolves into trivial vacuum with zero topological number (physically, it looks like textures emit Goldstone bosons and loose energy).

So, if a CMB photon passes the region where a texture is present, it gets redshifted. In this way textures lead to appearance of hot spots in the CMB.

How to then discriminate between the effects of textures on CMB and primordial effects? As Mark and Alessandra argue, one has to study non-gaussianities (in particular, they find that behaviors of primordial bispectrum and bispectrum fro textures are different).

2 Comments

    Leave a Comment

    Click here to cancel reply.


    For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

    Login with Facebook:

    or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

    Trackback responses to this post

    • 134. Cosmic strings - simple and nice introduction into the topic
    • 140. First two weeks of December at NEQNET

    Related Posts

    • No Related Post
    • Comments
    • Login
    • Search
    • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
      January 31, 2012 14:01
    • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
      March 18, 2011 20:03
    • Relaunching NEQNET
      January 20, 2011 21:01
    • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
      June 20, 2009 19:06
    • Dynamics of space storm
      June 19, 2009 12:06
    • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
    • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
    • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
    • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
    • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
    • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
    • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
    • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
      Register,
      login with your NEQNET profile
      or login with Facebook:

      • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
        • 33 comments
      • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
        • 33 comments
      • The very meaning of socialism
        • 26 comments
      • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
        • 26 comments
      • Biocentrism: book review
        • 24 comments

    Facebook: Community

    Facebook: Your Friends

    Google Friend Connect

    Links: Journals

    Links: Resources

    Links: Blogs

    • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
    Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.