NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

On Moore-Read states

COND-MAT — By Raoul Santachiara on May 12, 2009 at 11:38 am
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Raoul Santachiara is a stuff member at Laboratoire de Physique Theorique et Modeles Statistiques, Universite de Paris-Sud. His interests include statistical and mathematical physics, critical phenomena, disordered systems and entanglement properties of many-body systems.

I always find quite exciting when fundamental (and sometime abstract) results of pure mathematics and quantum field theory can be directly related to condensed matter or statistical mechanics problems with a clear physical interpretation and motivation. For instance, in our recent paper on “Clustering properties, Jack polynomials and unitary conformal field theories” (arXiv:0904.3702), we study the relation between the characterization of a class of symmetric polynomials with particular analytical properties (the clustering properties, specified later) and the correlation function of conserved currents in 2D massless quantum field theories, the so-called conformal field theories. The results we obtained have been directly inspired and motivated by the study of non-Abelian states in Fractional Quantum Hall systems (FQH).

The basics of FQH have been discussed extensively in many posts. In this respect I mention the post of Zlatko Papic which makes a nice introduction to the use of trial many-body wave functions in FQH. Among these functions, he introduces the Moore-Read states which represent the paradigm for non-Abelian states.

In this post I would like to start from discussing more in details some properties of the Moore-Read trial wave-functions. These are described by the so-called Pfaffian state and represent the simplest realization of pairing between spin polarized electrons.

Consider the polynomial of the On Moore Read states complex variables On Moore Read states :

On Moore Read states.

The above function is a Moore-Read state describing On Moore Read states bosons at filling fraction On Moore Read states. To see this, it is convenient to consider the system on a sphere with a radial magnetic field generating a flux On Moore Read states. The position of On Moore Read states-th particle on the sphere can then be represented as a complex variable On Moore Read states which is its stereographic projection. Each particle in the lowest Landau level (LLL) has orbital angular momentum On Moore Read states and the single-particle basis state take, besides an unimportant geometric factor, the form  On Moore Read states, where On Moore Read states is the On Moore Read states angular momentum quantum number. The total flux is On Moore Read states.

One can easily verify that the function On Moore Read states satisfies the following clustering properties: let On Moore Read states be the position where, say, the particles On Moore Read states and  On Moore Read states meet; the On Moore Read states vanishes as On Moore Read states when the third particle  On Moore Read states approaches. Because of this simple property, one can show that the Moore-Read states is the zero-energy ground state of a three-body projection Hamiltonian. This Hamiltonian is believed to capture the physics of the LLL where the effective hamiltonian is reduced to the interaction between particles. A natural generalization of the Moore-Read states is obtained by looking for symmetric polynomials which vanishes when at least  On Moore Read states particles approach at the same point. This yields the series of the so-called  On Moore Read states Read-Rezayi states which describe bosons at filling fraction  On Moore Read states .

Now, the crucial observation is that symmetric polynomials with such properties can be generated by correlation functions of certain conformal field theories (CFTs). Roughly speaking, the approach of the conformal field theory is to compute correlation functions (of a 2D massless quantum field theory) by studying the infinite constraints imposed by the conformal symmetry and by, more in general, other infinite additional symmetries. From the Noether theorem at each symmetry it is associated a set conserved current which act as a generator of this symmetry. These currents generate an algebra whose representations form the Hilbert space of the theory.

Among the different families of CFTs, a central role in condensed matter is played by the so-called parafermionic theories which are CFT with an additional On Moore Read states symmetry. Because of the particular form of the symmetry algebra, it turns out that the current correlation functions can be used to generate the polynomials with  On Moore Read states clustering properties. The simplest realization of these parafermionic theories produces the  On Moore Read states Read-Rezayi states. Note that the connection between FQH/CFT Model is a key point to understand the non-Abelian states as much of the theory underlying these is based on the monodromy properties of the CFT conformal blocks.

After the success of the series of the On Moore Read states Read-Rezayi states, there has been an intense activity to scan the other natural direction of generalizing these states. We have seen that the symmetric polynomials associated to the  On Moore Read states Read-Rezayi states vanishes as  On Moore Read states when the  On Moore Read states particles approaches. Now, what happen if now the symmetric polynomials with  On Moore Read states clustering properties vanishes more generally as  On Moore Read states, On Moore Read states integer? This has a direct clear physical interpretation as you are imposing that any cluster of  On Moore Read states particles has relative angular momentum less than On Moore Read states. These states will then describe bosons at filling fraction On Moore Read states.

As said above, the problem of generating such polynomials put in communication two different domains of research: from one side, the classification of well defined parafermionic theories, from the other side the theory of symmetric polynomials spanned by Jack polynomials with negative parameter.

In our paper we have investigated the interplay between these two approaches, putting in evidence some unexpected properties and proposing possible candidate for new non-abelian states… I hope that with this post I attired your attention to give a look at it!

To know more:

1. S.H. Simon, E.H. Rezayi, and N.R. Cooper, Phys. Rev. B 75, 075318 (2007).

2. B.A. Bernevig and F.D.M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 246802 (2008).

3. Vl.S. Dotsenko, J.L. Jacobsen and R. Santachiara, Nucl.Phys. B 656 259-324 (2003); Nucl.Phys. B 664 477-511 (2003); Nucl.Phys. B 679 464-494 (2004); Phys.Lett. B 584 186-191 (2004).

3 Comments

  1. Dmitry says:
    May 13, 2009 at 10:39 pm

    Dear Raoul,

    thanks for the great understandable post! Let me ask you a couple of naive questions:

    1) if we focus on filling factor 1/q, which state is more energetically favorable – Laughlin or Moore-Read? (I thought that Laughlin’s is proved to be the lowest energy one by variational methods)

    2) why should we ultimately focus only on three-body projection Hamiltonian? Is the logic behind 3-body that
    it seems to be possible to describe non-abelian statistics within 3-body Hamiltonian states,therefore, it might be relevant for describing FQHE with \nu=p/q where q is even?

    3) related to (1) and (2): if Laughlin w.f. is energietically favorable for odd q, while Moore-Read – for even q, why 3-body interactions are important for even q?

    Cheers,
    Dmitry.

    Reply
    • santachiara says:
      May 15, 2009 at 12:13 pm

      Thanks for your questions which are far from being naives! (hope I will not have you in some of my seminars ;-) )

      Let me answer you by remembering the general idea behind this line of research..The point in this research is to characterize distinct phases of matter. I recall that, at a given filling factor, you can find FQH states described in the asymptotic low-energy limit, and thus independent of the microscopic details details of the effective Hamiltonian and of the wave-function, by different universality classes,i.e. ground-state quantum number, properties of excitations etc etc.
      For instance it turns out that the filling 2+1/3 (so the first LL at filling 1/3)the Laughlin states have not a good overlap with the exact ground state. It has been then necessary to investigate other trial wave-functions, as the paired ones which form Lauglins States by pairing electrons, which are representative of other universality classes.

      All this just to say that, as in the case of the study of the critical point of statistical models, I cannot in general say, on the basis of a the microscopic hamiltonian, which is the universality class describing my system. So one tries to classify the possible classes on the basis of general “symmetries”, as the properties to be zero-energy eigenstate of specific pseudi-potential hamiltonian..

      Reply
  2. Dmitry says:
    May 20, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    Dear Raoul,

    thanks for the explanations! I guess the ultimate question is why FQHE with odd and even q belong to different universality classes (why they are so amazingly different in other words), but probably nobody has an answer to this question nowadays…

    Cheers,
    Dmitry.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

On Moore-Read states

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • On moduli stabilisation in heterotic orbifolds On moduli stabilisation in heterotic orbifolds
    April 24, 2012 09:04
  • A holographic model of the quantum Hall effect A holographic model of the quantum Hall effect
    April 19, 2012 09:04
  • Transdimensional Multiverse Measures Transdimensional Multiverse Measures
    April 18, 2012 11:04
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Neeta Mohla: Hello, Dr. Dmitry I'm a science enthusiast and read yr review of biocentrism. I've been sceptical on both sides an...
  • Momchil: I want to ask the experts about an apparent confusion, that appears in many papers on the Unruh effect. As you stat...
  • Paul: Excellent list! how lucky you are to be involved in the effort to solve some of these. On time, I question its re...
  • philbert: Simple illustration and may apply to mixed layer boundary layers, how about the stable and other types of boundary ...
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 34 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 25 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.