NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

(In)visible Z’ and dark matter

ASTRO, HEP-TH/PH — By Alberto Romagnoni on May 7, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

(In)visible Z and dark matter Alberto Romagnoni is a postdoc at LPT, Orsay. Dmitry.

In this post I discuss my recent work “(In)visible Z’ and dark matter”, done in collaboration with E. Dudas, Y. Mambrini and S. Pokorski. I think there are two main messages I should stress to summarize our paper. The first one is more interesting for its phenomenological consequences and a possible striking signature for dark matter. The second one is more important from a theoretical point of view, and concerns the so-called “decoupling” theorem.

The starting point is the attempt to answer the following question: “How is it possible to see an (in)visible Z’?”. Let me first define what is an “(in)visible” Z’ for us, and then discuss the main point about phenomenology of dark matter. Finally, I will briefly discuss the theoretical aspects of such a construction.

In the spirit of minimally extending the Standard Model (SM), a possibility is given by adding matter and/or gauge groups to it. One subject studied in details is clearly the simplest case, when one adds just an extra Abelian gauge group (In)visible Z and dark matter. This gauge symmetry is typically broken and a new massive gauge boson Z’ enters in the game. It is easy to imagine many different types of signatures for this kind of particle, most of all if Z’ couples to SM, or in other words, if the SM particles are charged under this extra (In)visible Z and dark matter. In particular, if Z’ mass is around TeV scale, there is the possibility to see the corresponding resonance in particles accelerators like LHC.

But, what happens if Standard Model spectrum is blind with respect to (In)visible Z and dark matter? Clearly, if there is no way for Z’ to talk with SM, no signal will be possible. However, one can imagine that  an hidden sector of heavy fermions can couple to both SM and (In)visible Z and dark matter gauge groups. These new fields have obviously to satisfy some constraints, namely they have to arrange for the cancellation of all the anomalies, the Abelian and the (In)visible Z and dark matter mixed ones. Nonetheless, their presence induces loop effects that can be rephrased in terms of effective vertices for the vector fields. In other words, if the extra fermions are really heavier than the SM spectrum and the Z’ boson, they can be “integrated out” at a scale M, and in the effective Lagrangian, new interaction terms appear mainly as trilinear couplings of the form

(In)visible Z and dark matter,

multiplied by a factor roughly speaking proportional to (In)visible Z and dark matter, with (In)visible Z and dark matter a one-loop order parameter ((In)visible Z and dark matter), and (In)visible Z and dark matter the momentum entering in the vertex. These induced interactions can make the Z’ visible, or better, (in)visible.

There are in the literature some examples of LHC analysis for this and similar scenarios, but our purpose is slightly different and concerns Dark Matter (DM). The main idea is the following. Let suppose that the dark matter candidate is lighter than the fermionic sector which we integrated out, and uncharged with respect to SM gauge group. The unique tree level annihilation diagram is given by the exchange of Z’ . Then, Z’ can couple to the visible sector only via the couplings to the SM gauge bosons. In particular, the trilinear ones will be the dominant contributions, and the three channel  (In)visible Z and dark matter are opened. It is possible to show that a region exists in the parameter space (namely when the Z’ mass is near to the pole, (In)visible Z and dark matter) where these processes contributes to the correct relic abundance measured by WMAP.

We computed the relic density using the last released version of the Micromegas code, modified to include the (in)visible Z’ and its couplings to the SM. The important point is that the same process produces a monochromatic gamma ray. In fact, it is a simple exercise to show that looking at the final state (In)visible Z and dark matter, the energy of the photon is fixed by the relation

(In)visible Z and dark matter.

Actually, this kind of effect is well known also in some other extensions of SM, namely in supersymmetric ones. However, since it comes loop suppressed with respect to the main annihilation channel of DM, usually this gamma-ray is completely invisible. In our model instead, since the gamma-ray is produced in the same diagram contributing to the relic density, it can easily be disentangled from the diffuse background and could be seen by the satellite GLAST/FERMI-LAT after 5 years of data taking. We used the Pythia Monte Carlo to simulate the gamma-ray spectrum, and an example of the results (for a choice of the parameters in the effective Lagrangian) is shown in the figure, for a classical NFW halo profile and (In)visible Z and dark matter.

(In)visible Z and dark matter

A subtlety is given by the possible kinetic mixing between the Z’ and  the hypercharge field strengths, (In)visible Z and dark matter, also induced by loop effects. In principle, this term could induce SM millicharges for the DM candidate, and then allow direct annihilation in Z, and then in SM particles. However, in the parameter space region chosen before, its effects are not so important, and the gamma-ray remains visible.

Now, let me briefly discuss the origin of these trilinear terms. The “decoupling” theorem is a well known result in which the usual logic of renormalizable theories tells us that the interactions, mediated by heavy fermions running in loops, are generally suppressed by the masses of these fermions. However, a first type of counterexample has been done by D’Hoker and Farhi in 1984. They have shown that if the heavy  fermions “integrated out” contribute to the  anomalies, then gauge invariance constraints them to generate anomalous terms in the effective action, not suppressed by their mass scale. The reason is due to the topological nature, and then to the scale invariance of such anomalous terms. Our case is clearly different, since we integrate out an entire sector arranging for anomalies cancellation. This is the reason why all our vectorial trilinear terms are mass suppressed. However, in the paper we discuss the possibility to escape this fact, once one considers more than one extra Abelian gauge group. In fact, it is easy to construct an example of an heavy sector inducing trilinear terms like (In)visible Z and dark matter, with coefficient still of one-loop order, but not further mass suppressed. In this case, the gamma-ray effect should be still more enhanced. In our opinion, this could be an interesting subject of further analysis and it would be interesting to perform a systematic study of the effects of the effective operators at low-energy from a decoupling perspective.

0 Comments

You can be the first one to leave a comment.

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.