NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

366. Some interesting recent papers in Arxiv

ASTRO, COND-MAT, HEP-TH/PH — By Dmitry Podolsky on April 23, 2009 at 10:04 am
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

Just wanted to acknowledge their existence, although I’ll not be really able to review them due to the lack of time…

1. Quantum field theory

1.1. “Non-Abelian Duality and Confinement in N=2 Supersymmetric QCD” by Michail Shifman and Alesha Yung. The authors study transitions from weak to strong coupling in N = 2 SQCD that happen when you change parameters of the theory – that is, the coefficient 366. Some interesting recent papers in Arxiv in front of Fayet?Iliopoulos term and quark mass differences. Here the authors are interested in the case 366. Some interesting recent papers in Arxiv and study phases of the theory at different values of 366. Some interesting recent papers in Arxiv.

1.2. “Deconfinement phase transition in mirror of symmetries” by M.N. Chernodub, Atsushi Nakamura and V.I.Zakharov. The idea is that the 4d magnetic vortices get reduced to their 3d projection in the deconfining phase. Behavior of the latter can be described by a 3d Higgs field, which is condensed.

2. Quantum computations

2.1. “Topological phases and quantum computation” by Alexei Kitaev and Chris Laumann. If you follow NEQNET really carefully, you should remember Kitaev (he is a master mind of topological quantum computation). This paper contains the set of his lectures on the subject – in particular, topological effects in 1d superconductors and honeycomb model (which features non-abelian anyons).

3. Cosmology

3.1. “Non-Gaussianity as a Probe of the Physics of the Primordial Universe and the Astrophysics of the Low Redshift Universe“, a white paper by a huge number of co-authors (there are so many of them, that one may start wondering who really wrote the paper 366. Some interesting recent papers in Arxiv ) If you are, say, a curious condensed matter theorist (or experimentalist) and always wanted to learn what is the non-gaussianity buzz in cosmology about, that’s the paper you want to go through – it is short (8 pages) and it does not really contain a single formula.

3.2. “Levitating Dark Matter” by Nemanja Kaloper and Antonio Padilla. The basic idea of the paper is that dark matter can be realized in the form of quanta of heavy fields satisfying BPS condition (mass of the particle is equal to its charge). In this case, gauge repulsion may effectively look like an “antigravity”, and one has to take it into account when studying flows of dark matter agglomerates.

3.3. “Dynamical compactification from de Sitter space” by Sean M. Carroll, Matthew C. Johnson and Lisa Randall. The authors argue that dS space “is unstable to the nucleation of non-singular geometries containing spacetime regions with different numbers of macroscopic dimensions”. The setup they discuss is D-dimensional space with cosmological constant (so, background is supposed to be 366. Some interesting recent papers in Arxiv initially) and q-form gauge fields. The claim is that this setup is unstable w.r.t. the nucleation of 366. Some interesting recent papers in Arxiv-dimensional regions stabilized by flux.

4. Condensed matter theory

4.1. “Introduction to superconductivity in metals without inversion center“ by Vladimir Mineev and M. Sigrist. Both authors are well-known experts in unconventional superconductivity and, as I understood, this paper is a single chapter from the forthcoming book on the subject.

That’s pretty much all that caught my eye… Did I miss anything exciting that happened during the last week?

0 Comments

You can be the first one to leave a comment.

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.