Comments on: Other interesting things in ArXiv (11 Jun 2009) http://www.nonequilibrium.net/interesting-arxiv-11-jun-2009/ Cosmology, turbulence, markets, non-equilibrium QFT and much more. No nonsense, just science Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:43:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Dmitry http://www.nonequilibrium.net/interesting-arxiv-11-jun-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-9139 Dmitry Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:41:51 +0000 http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=4148#comment-9139 Dear Pope, <blockquote>*any* field theory can be made generally covariant if you are willing to go to enough trouble</blockquote> Ok, fair enough, that's exactly what they did - covariantized Horava gravity. There was also an issue whether you can really easily couple matter with this "gravity" (in the regime where it seems to be relativistic), and as they show, you actually can, so one can now try to analyze perturbations at non-linear level (to find, say, how LSS gets developed in this theory). Cheers and thanks! Dmitry. Dear Pope,

*any* field theory can be made generally covariant if you are willing to go to enough trouble

Ok, fair enough, that’s exactly what they did – covariantized Horava gravity. There was also an issue whether you can really easily couple matter with this “gravity” (in the regime where it seems to be relativistic), and as they show, you actually can, so one can now try to analyze perturbations at non-linear level (to find, say, how LSS gets developed in this theory).

Cheers and thanks!
Dmitry.

]]> By: Pope Maledict XXIII http://www.nonequilibrium.net/interesting-arxiv-11-jun-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-9128 Pope Maledict XXIII Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:29:42 +0000 http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=4148#comment-9128 Regarding C. Germani et al., ?Relativistic Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point?, well, *any* field theory can be made generally covariant if you are willing to go to enough trouble: even Newtonian gravity has a generally covariant description, as you can see in an early chapter of the book by Misner Thorne and Wheeler. And of course Special Relativity is generally covariant already: consider a spacetime with vanishing curvature tensor, etc etc etc. [Amazingly, there are still some people who don't know this....]The only question is whether the resulting formulation is so incredibly ugly that you just want to throw it away and replace it by something nicer looking [eg general relativity....]. Looking at this paper I would say personally that Horava gravity in its generally covariant form is a lot less ugly than I would have expected. But it's still pretty ugly. Your mileage, as the Americans say, may vary. Regarding C. Germani et al., ?Relativistic Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point?, well, *any* field theory can be made generally covariant if you are willing to go to enough trouble: even Newtonian gravity has a generally covariant description, as you can see in an early chapter of the book by Misner Thorne and Wheeler. And of course Special Relativity is generally covariant already: consider a spacetime with vanishing curvature tensor, etc etc etc. [Amazingly, there are still some people who don't know this....]The only question is whether the resulting formulation is so incredibly ugly that you just want to throw it away and replace it by something nicer looking [eg general relativity....]. Looking at this paper I would say personally that Horava gravity in its generally covariant form is a lot less ugly than I would have expected. But it’s still pretty ugly. Your mileage, as the Americans say, may vary.

]]>