NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers

APPLIED — By Dmitry Podolsky on April 28, 2009 at 1:29 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

The previous parts on interaction between laser emission and material of fuel capsule are “Inertial confinement – using lasers for compression” and “Inertial confinement: more on interaction of laser emission with matter“. I hope to finish with discussion of laser-target interaction today and proceed to instabilities (the most interesting part of the physics of inertial confinement reactors from my point of view).

So, as we discussed previous time, the outer shell of the capsule (ablator) rapidly evaporates due to the interaction with laser emission. A so called ablative pressure impulse is formed near the boundary of the evaporating region: the main contribution into this pressure comes from heat pressure and reactive pressure of plasma (if plasma temperature is around 1 keV, plasma moves towards the center of the capsule with characteristic velocities as high as 375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers, corresponding to reactive pressure around 375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers atm).

Due to ablative pressure the part of the capsule that did not evaporate is getting collapsed towards the center of the capsule (typically, the characteristic time of collapse is of the same order of magnitude as the length of the laser impulse). The collapse itself can be described as follows.

Let us consider for simplicity that the target (fuel capsule) is almost a sphere, with thin ablator (outer layer) and empty inside. If so, we can write

375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers, (1)

375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers, (2)

where 375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers is the mass of abalator layer, 375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers – “current radius” of the compressed target, 375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers – is the compression velocity and 375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers is the velocity of target corona. The solution of the Eqs. (1) and (2) depends only on a single parameter

375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers.

The compression velocity 375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers (it is of the same order of magnitude as the speed of sound in plasma) and kinetic energy of the ablator 375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers are other two important parameters.

One more important parameter is a quantity

375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers

called hydrodynamic efficiency. It determines how much absorbed energy goes into kinetic energy of collapsing ablator layer. In spherical targets, 375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers depends on 375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers and varies from 3% to 15%.

375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers

Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities in fuel capsule. Computer simulations by LLNL.

Apart from transformation of absorbed energy and kinetic energy of collapsing ablator (the outer layer acts as a forcer adiabatically compressing the fuel inside the capsule), there is another important mechanism that leads to compression of the fuel – shock waves. Simultaneously, shock waves are the big problem for the whole idea since they lead to inhomogeneous heating of the fuel. Fast electrons created due to the interaction of target material with the laser impulse and X-rays as well as development of Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities also lead to inhomogeneous heating of the fuel. In overall, we do have freedom to resolve these issues to some extent since we can set the flux in the laser impulse (375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers), its wavelength (375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers), the form of the impulse and the capsule.

If we are able to relatively precisely control the form of the capsule and the homogeneity of the laser impulse, theory shows that the peripheral part of the target can be compressed up to the densities of the order 375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers and temperatures around 0.5-1 keV, while the central part of the capsule can be heated up to 10 keV (the density there will be much smaller though – about 375. Inertial confinement: concluding part on lasers). In principle, this is enough for a self-sustained thermonuclear reaction to take off. The reaction will start in the center of the capsule and capture the outer layers of the target.

1 Comment

    Leave a Comment

    Click here to cancel reply.


    For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

    Login with Facebook:

    or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

    Trackback responses to this post

    • NEQNET: Last two weeks of April | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena

    Related Posts

    • No Related Post
    • Comments
    • Login
    • Search
    • On moduli stabilisation in heterotic orbifolds On moduli stabilisation in heterotic orbifolds
      April 24, 2012 09:04
    • A holographic model of the quantum Hall effect A holographic model of the quantum Hall effect
      April 19, 2012 09:04
    • Transdimensional Multiverse Measures Transdimensional Multiverse Measures
      April 18, 2012 11:04
    • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
      January 31, 2012 14:01
    • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
      March 18, 2011 20:03
    • Neeta Mohla: Hello, Dr. Dmitry I'm a science enthusiast and read yr review of biocentrism. I've been sceptical on both sides an...
    • Momchil: I want to ask the experts about an apparent confusion, that appears in many papers on the Unruh effect. As you stat...
    • Paul: Excellent list! how lucky you are to be involved in the effort to solve some of these. On time, I question its re...
    • philbert: Simple illustration and may apply to mixed layer boundary layers, how about the stable and other types of boundary ...
    • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
    • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
    • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
    • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
    • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
      Register,
      login with your NEQNET profile
      or login with Facebook:

      • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
        • 34 comments
      • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
        • 33 comments
      • The very meaning of socialism
        • 26 comments
      • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
        • 26 comments
      • Biocentrism: book review
        • 25 comments

    Facebook: Community

    Facebook: Your Friends

    Google Friend Connect

    Links: Journals

    Links: Resources

    Links: Blogs

    • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
    Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.