NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

287. Heavy quark thermalization in classical lattice gauge theory

COND-MAT, HEP-TH/PH — By Marcus Tassler on February 27, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

This is a guest post by Marcus Tassler from the U. of Munster. Dmitry.

Dmitry has kindly invited me to present a recent article in which we use classical lattice gauge theory as a simple and numerically accessible model to study the dynamics of gauge theories at high temperature. We apply this technique to investigate the momentum diffusion of heavy quarks, which is observed to be surprisingly rapid in heavy-ion experiments, and point out the possibility to measure the diffusion constant in ordinary lattice simulations. The work I will present was done in collaboration with Mikko Laine, Guy D. Moore and Owe Philipsen and is available as arXiv:0902.2856.

Typical momentum scales of the quark-gluon plasma
Before going into some detail I will briefly introduce the typical momentum scales of the quark-gluon plasma at high temperature:

  1. Hard momentum scale: p~T
    The corresponding length scale is the average inter particle spacing 1/T (with T being the temperature of the plasma).
  2. Electric scale: p~gT
    Due to interactions with the plasma the gluon acquires a thermal mass, the so called Debye mass mD~gT, which suppresses electric interactions over distances larger than 1/mD.
  3. Magnetic scale: p~g2T
    At this momentum scale magnetic interactions experience a dynamical screening which suppresses them over distances larger than 1/g2T. Chromo-magnetic forces are the most far reaching interactions in the plasma.

The long ranged thermal physics of the soft electric and magnetic scales is responsible for collective phenomena and has long been argued to be essentially classical at high temperatures. At length scales smaller than the average inter particle spacing 1/T thermal effects necessarily become irrelevant and quantum physics regularizes the high energy behaviour of the system.

How to study the dynamics of the plasma on the lattice ?
To study the dynamics of the plasma we now introduce a lattice cutoff to separate the thermal scales from the quantum scale. Choosing a lattice spacing much larger than the typical inter particle spacing a>>1/T the hard scale is replaced by the borders of the Brillouin zone. Having isolated the thermal momentum scales the system becomes amenable to a treatment by classical statistics. We choose a temporal gauge and replace the classical partition function by the corresponding partition function for gauge fields discretized on a spatial (i.e. 3-dimensional) lattice. To study the time evolution of the statistical ensemble we solve the nonabelian Maxwell equations of the lattice system which are shown in the following:

287. Heavy quark thermalization in classical lattice gauge theory Faradays law
287. Heavy quark thermalization in classical lattice gauge theory Amperes law
287. Heavy quark thermalization in classical lattice gauge theory Gauss constraints

Table 1: Maxwell equations for Yang-Mills theory on the lattice.

Links and plaquettes are denoted as Ui and Uij while the generators of SU(N) are represented by Ta. Faradays law of induction defines the color electric field Ei=EiaTa, which evolves according to Amperes law. The equation of motion is obtained directly from a variation of the lattice action. Gauss’s law finally serves as a constraint for the field configurations of the statistical ensemble. The time coordinate is continuous and we are working in Minkowski space. At high temperatures a staggering agreement with the predictions from perturbation theory is observed for a wide range of quantities (i.e. any quantity which is insensitive to the hard scale), while at intermediate temperatures the classical system captures the otherwise inaccessible non-perturbative dynamics of the plasma. We therefore argue for the use of this classical lattice system as a simple numerically amenable model to study the dynamics of the plasma and point to the successfull application of similar techniques in areas ranging from electroweak physics to inflationary preheting.

The puzzle of the rapid diffusion of heavy quarks in a quark-gluon plasma
We use this approach to investigate the random walk of heavy quarks in a quark-gluon plasma which is described by the following Langevin equation:

287. Heavy quark thermalization in classical lattice gauge theory

The second equation expresses that the random force, i.e. the small kicks a heavy quark experiences when interacting with gluons in the plasma, is uncorrelated in time and direction. There are two coefficients, the relaxation rate and the diffusion constant, which are related by a fluctuation-dissipation relation (M is the mass of the quark):

287. Heavy quark thermalization in classical lattice gauge theory

To describe the diffusion of heavy quarks it is therefore sufficient to determine the diffusion constant which can be obtained by calculating or measuring the correlator of two chromoelectric fields seperated in time and connected by a Wilson line W:

287. Heavy quark thermalization in classical lattice gauge theory

The heavy quark diffusion constant, as obtained from a measurement of this correlator on a classical lattice, is shown in figure 1.

287. Heavy quark thermalization in classical lattice gauge theory
Fig. 1: The diffusion constant as obtained from the classical lattice simulations plotted against the inverse lattice coupling.

The solid line is the prediction from perturbation theory which is reproduced exactly by the lattice data at high temperatures. This agreement is expected since the perturbative expansion is known to agree with a classical approximation at asymptotically high temperatures. In the intermediate temperature range, relevant for the physics of heavy-ion collisions, the heavy quark diffusion constant is found to be much larger than expected in perturbation theory. This indicates that the rapid thermalization of heavy quarks observed in heavy-ion experiments can indeed be understood by studying the non-perturbative dynamics of the quark-gluon plasma. We test the reliability of the result by comparing different discretization schemes and find that the results are consistent at week couplings. In the strong coupling regime, where it is natural to expect any classical approximation to be invalid, the results start to depend on the discretization scheme which is analyzed in detail in the article.

287. Heavy quark thermalization in classical lattice gauge theory
Fig. 2: Spectrum of the correlator as obtained from the simulations.

A new quantity to be measured on the lattice ?
Any attempt to measure the diffusion constant in an ordinary lattice simulation is faced with the serious problem that the corresponding correlator is defined in Minkowski space and needs to be obtained by analytical continuation. To illustrate that this is possible in principle the shape of the correlator is shown in figure 2. The spectrum, as obtained from the classical lattice simulations, turns out to be very flat around the origin for physical couplings. Since the frequency spectrum in euclidean space is a discrete spectrum of Matsubara modes this is just what is needed for a reliable measurement of the diffusion constant in ordinary lattice simulations. We therefore point out that this is a promising new quantity which can be measured in the context of the full quantum theory.

3 Comments

  1. Dmitry says:
    February 27, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    Dear Marcus,

    you say that the most of the energy resides at k\sim{}T – are we talking about energy density

    dk\cdot{}k^2\omega_kn_k?

    Its profile is indeed localized near k\sim{}T, but if so – I am not quite sure is there any meaning to cut all the physics at k\sim{}T and in particular study thermalization questions in this setup…

    Let me explain what I mean. Initially, energy distribution is peaked in the IR (the occupation numbers of modes with k\sim{}1/a are zero) and it propagates towards UV due to rescattering of particles. Complete thermalization means Jeans law

    n_k\sim\frac{T}{\omega_k}\sim\frac{T}{k},

    i.e., energy density \epsilon_k peaked in the UV. Basically, on the lattice, as long as the distribution function n_k hits the UV cut-off, the system gets thermalized. On the other hand, if you study theory on lattices with larger and larger resolution, thermalization times get longer and longer, and usually one cannot believe lattice simulation results if some non-trivial physics happens at the cut-off scale.

    Did you do lattice simulations with different lattice scales a?

    Cheers,
    Dmitry.

    Reply
    • Marcus Tassler says:
      February 27, 2009 at 6:26 pm

      Dear Dmitry,

      I see what you are aiming at. The most important point to realize here is that we are treating the lattice as a classical statistical system with the partition function

      \int DU DE \delta(G) e^{-\beta_L H(U,E)}

      where H is the discretized Hamiltonian of Yang-Mills theory in a temporal gauge, G enforces Gauss’s law and the inverse temperature for the lattice system is:

      \beta_L=\frac{2N}{ag^2T}

      Just like in QED the classical theory suffers from UV divergencies as you correctly pointed out. In particular the energy density is UV divergent in analogy to the famous Rayleigh-Jeans divergence of electrodynamics, which necessitated the introduction of quantum mechanics.

      However, just like in QED, it is also possible to understand certain processes in the context of the classical theory itself (i.e. long ranged processes insensitive to UV physics). A convenient way of matching the results to the full continuum theory is to introduce a momentum space lattice cutoff in perturbation theory and compare the perturbative results to the results of the simulation (which we did). In particular this allows to estimate the extent of non-perturbative corrections due to classical IR-physics.

      Another way to solve this problem is to explicitly integrate out the hard modes of the system which leads to an UV-safe theory of classical fields coupled to an effective Hard-Mode distribution allowing to take the limit a-> 0 (we checked against a Hard-Loop improved code as well).

      Also, when referring to thermalization, I was pointing at the thermalization of the heavy quarks due to their rapid momentum diffusion in the plasma.

      Cheers, Marcus

      Reply
    • Marcus Tassler says:
      February 27, 2009 at 7:40 pm

      Dear Dmitry,

      I should probably also comment on the thermalization technique, or if you prefer the algorithm to generate individual configurations of the classical statistical ensemble. I will describe the simplest (but not most efficient) technique:

      In the simplest scheme the gauge fields are discretized using a standard 3D Wilson action and can be generated by an ordinary heatbath algorithm. The electric fields appear as Gaussians in the partition function and are thus even more simple to generate. An additional projection/post-thermalization step is enforces Gauss’s law.

      As you can imagine, since the lattice is just three dimensional, the Monte Carlo part of the simulation thermalizes rapidly to a stable plaquette expectation value and overall energy density and does not suffer from any type of UV problem (since we always hit the cutoff introduced by the inverse lattice temperature beta_L).

      The numerically expansive part of the simulation is that every configuration of the ensemble is evolved using the non-abelian Maxwell equations.

      Cheers,

      Marcus

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.