Recent posts: R. Biswas. Cosmological parameters in the context of time varying w
Powered by MaxBlogPress 

376. A GRB detected at z=8.3

Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF                                


… which makes it, as it seems, the most distant object in the Universe observed so far – see the Swift page (that’s the spacecraft that originally detected the GRB on Apr 23) on the NASA site for technical details or this article on New Scientist site for general discussion.

Swift detects GRB at redshift 8.3

That’s the guy.

Do you find it ironic that we can detect CMB photons from the last scattering surface (400000 years after the Big Bang, z\sim{}1000) and photons from objects like GRB 090423 at z\sim{}10 (640 million years after the Big Bang) but not so much in between? (The only radiation emitted during those Dark Ages is 21 cm neutral H line.) Is it really true that nothing interesting happened in the Universe for those 600 million years? Deep in my heart I seriously doubt that.

  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

If you liked the post, please kindly consider to leave a comment, subscribe to the RSS feed or get new posts sent directly to your Inbox. If you want to chat with me in real time, you can find me on Twitter. The posts below are probably related to the subject of this one:

Into dark ages or again about GRB090423
Fermi telescope does not confirm DM claims
27. Eye on ArXiv: 24 Apr 2008 – Detection of dark matter?
385. NEQNET: Last two weeks of April
5. The Universe is expanding (Inflationary perturbations 1)

RSS feed | Trackback URI

4 Comments »

Comment by Lubos Motl
2009-04-28 16:25:09

Don’t you think that it is, on the contrary, very reasonable to “generously” give the Universe those 600 million years to relax before first structure formation took place? I am afraid that Universe took this vacation time even if someone doesn’t wish so. ;-)

If the Universe had to do many other things during all those years, it would really be incorrect to assume that it was ever uniform and free of structures. And there would be no reason to think that the CMB remained so uniform etc.

Comment by Dmitry
2009-04-28 20:37:40

Hi Lubos,

Sure, that’s what general lore says. Though, structure formation starts from random initial conditions – there were rare large fluctuations of \delta\rho in our huge universe, so I am sure that we will find more GRBs at larger redshifts with better instruments :-) Still, that sounds too boring.

And there would be no reason to think that the CMB remained so uniform etc.

That’s not really an argument since all the LSS (with \delta\rho{}/\rho{}>1) formed during last 13 billion years does not really influence uniformity of CMB, does it? :-) But you are right suggesting that I don’t have anything in my pocket to show except my severe disappointment by how life actually works :-)

Another boring thing in physics: take an interval of energies before 1 TeV and GUT scale, that’s quite a long interval, isn’t it? The suggestion that there is no really interesting physics in this interval (compared to, say, the interval between 10^{-3} eV and 1 TeV :-) ) seems extremely boring to me :-)

Cheers,
Dmitry.

 
 
Please, enter your name (required)
e-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
or login via Facebook by clicking the button below
Your comment (smaller size | larger size)
For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

« Back to text comment
or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post