NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

376. A GRB detected at z=8.3

ASTRO — By Dmitry Podolsky on April 28, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

… which makes it, as it seems, the most distant object in the Universe observed so far – see the Swift page (that’s the spacecraft that originally detected the GRB on Apr 23) on the NASA site for technical details or this article on New Scientist site for general discussion.

376. A GRB detected at z=8.3

That’s the guy.

Do you find it ironic that we can detect CMB photons from the last scattering surface (400000 years after the Big Bang, 376. A GRB detected at z=8.3) and photons from objects like GRB 090423 at 376. A GRB detected at z=8.3 (640 million years after the Big Bang) but not so much in between? (The only radiation emitted during those Dark Ages is 21 cm neutral H line.) Is it really true that nothing interesting happened in the Universe for those 600 million years? Deep in my heart I seriously doubt that.

4 Comments

  1. Lubos Motl says:
    April 28, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    Don’t you think that it is, on the contrary, very reasonable to “generously” give the Universe those 600 million years to relax before first structure formation took place? I am afraid that Universe took this vacation time even if someone doesn’t wish so. ;-)

    If the Universe had to do many other things during all those years, it would really be incorrect to assume that it was ever uniform and free of structures. And there would be no reason to think that the CMB remained so uniform etc.

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      April 28, 2009 at 8:37 pm

      Hi Lubos,

      Sure, that’s what general lore says. Though, structure formation starts from random initial conditions – there were rare large fluctuations of \delta\rho in our huge universe, so I am sure that we will find more GRBs at larger redshifts with better instruments :-) Still, that sounds too boring.

      And there would be no reason to think that the CMB remained so uniform etc.

      That’s not really an argument since all the LSS (with \delta\rho{}/\rho{}>1) formed during last 13 billion years does not really influence uniformity of CMB, does it? :-) But you are right suggesting that I don’t have anything in my pocket to show except my severe disappointment by how life actually works :-)

      Another boring thing in physics: take an interval of energies before 1 TeV and GUT scale, that’s quite a long interval, isn’t it? The suggestion that there is no really interesting physics in this interval (compared to, say, the interval between 10^{-3} eV and 1 TeV :-) ) seems extremely boring to me :-)

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

  • NEQNET: Last two weeks of April | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena
  • Into dark ages or again about GRB090423 | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.