NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

370. The future of science blogs

Uncategorized — By Dmitry Podolsky on April 25, 2009 at 10:05 am
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

I’ve just finished a reading rather interesting article by Mark Penn on WSJ called “America’s newest profession: bloggers for hire“. Penn presents rather interesting stats there (based on analysis by Technorati):

370. The future of science blogs

The best studies we can find say we are a nation of over 20 million bloggers, with 1.7 million profiting from the work, and 452,000 of those using blogging as their primary source of income.

I guess, it is well explained in comments after the post how much these estimations are actually worthy, but the very point of the post remains solid as I think: blogging is a possibility to make full-time income, albeit maybe only hundreds of people in the world are able to make it their full-time income.

What I’ve also noticed is a general tendency for smaller blogs to be submerged into larger blogs/blog portals. The reason for that becomes very clear when you compare Alexa ranks of individual blogs (say, Lubos Motl’s Reference Frame – around 217000 right now) and portals (say, Science Blogs – around 8000 right now) and take into account that rank does scale with internet traffic. In other words, if a site has more content, it will have larger traffic, and individual blogs will always loose in this respect to blog portals.

As I said, this seems to be a general tendency. What about science blogs, close to our hearts? The same thing holds here as well: during last months many individual popular blogs “went corporate” including Cosmic Variance, ArXiv Blog and Quantum Diaries Survivor.

So, the statement of the problem I would like to solve is the following: blog portals have much more traffic than individual blogs since they produce much more content (let us say, a blog portal produces 50 updates per day, while an individual blog – 2-3 posts/day at maximum). How to make the individual blog competitive with a portal? I’ll be really happy to hear your thoughts…

3 Comments

  1. Javier says:
    April 26, 2009 at 10:01 am

    I read recently (sorry, I don?t remember where), that the success of a blog doesn?t depends in the number (not even the quality) of posts.

    Obvious nonimportant reasons aside (the average reader not always is going to like the smarter content)the reason seemed to be related to the ability to belong to “social network”. That doesn?t necessarily means to be in a blog portal. It is something more like “if you post comments in my blog I?ll post them in yours and I?ll link your blog so you will have more readers).

    Also it is useful if in your blog there are interesting links. Specially if hey are RSS links. Think, for example, of the U-duality blog. It has RSS to arxiv last articles (I copied it) and also an RSS to most recent comments in some selected blogs (I didn’ copy it because , well, I would feel some shame if I would do so xD)

    About the number of posts per day that you mention my opinion is that you wouldn?t worry too much. Too many posts daily can be contraproducent. Specially if they are serially depending some of them. In your blog you have many interesting posts that I would like to read some serialized(for example the series of turbulence) and other ones unserialized, but simply I have no time to read all the posts of your blog. That is a bad thing for your serialized posts because I can?t read (or I shouldn?t) read the last ones without reading the previous.

    That is, you have, for my particular free time, far enough rhythm of publication. You mention blogs with 50 posts daily, who in hell has time to read them? And if you begin to loose too posts you can ending losing the interest in a blog.

    Anyway, I guess that if you would decide to change your blog to a blogportal I believe that you will not have any problem in getting good offers ;-) .

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      April 26, 2009 at 8:09 pm

      Dear Javier,

      Obvious nonimportant reasons aside (the average reader not always is going to like the smarter content)the reason seemed to be related to the ability to belong to ?social network?. That doesn’t necessarily means to be in a blog portal.

      Actually, I have pretty decent Twitter (around 800 people right now) and Facebook (about 300 friends) base. What I’ve found is that contribution from social networks does lift your traffic but not nearly as effectively as larger number of content.

      You mention blogs with 50 posts daily, who in hell has time to read them?

      The point is that you read what you like but somebody else who visits the blog will also find what she likes among those 50 daily posts :-) Think for example about traffic that comes from Google – if you have more indexed content, Google will send more visitors to your blog. But increasing the number of posts you do can loose some loyal readers, that’s true (an observed effect mentioned somewhere). In overall, though, the traffic will be increased because of new people visiting your site – check out top 10 technorati blogs and how many posts per day do they publish.

      Anyway, I guess that if you would decide to change your blog to a blogportal I believe that you will not have any problem in getting good offers

      Right now I don’t have an intention to do so… ;-)

      Cheers and thanks for dropping by,
      Dmitry.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

  • NEQNET: Last two weeks of April | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.