Comments on: Into dark ages or again about GRB090423 http://www.nonequilibrium.net/dark-ages-grb090423/#utm_source=feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed For physicts by physicists Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:24:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Twitted by dpodolsky http://www.nonequilibrium.net/dark-ages-grb090423/comment-page-1/#comment-9113 Twitted by dpodolsky Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:12:23 +0000 http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=4137#comment-9113 [...] This post was Twitted by dpodolsky - Real-url.org [...] [...] This post was Twitted by dpodolsky – Real-url.org [...]

]]> By: Dmitry http://www.nonequilibrium.net/dark-ages-grb090423/comment-page-1/#comment-9112 Dmitry Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:45:23 +0000 http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=4137#comment-9112 :-) Yes, it seems so. Check out "Cosmic variance", they have a rather nice discussion right now featuring one of Nature's editors. :-)

Yes, it seems so. Check out “Cosmic variance”, they have a rather nice discussion right now featuring one of Nature’s editors.

]]> By: Daniel de Fran?a MTd2 http://www.nonequilibrium.net/dark-ages-grb090423/comment-page-1/#comment-9111 Daniel de Fran?a MTd2 Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:40:15 +0000 http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=4137#comment-9111 You mean, you cannot post any of these papers? http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.1577 http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.1578 You mean, you cannot post any of these papers?
http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.1577
http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.1578

]]>