NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

Into dark ages or again about GRB090423

ASTRO — By Dmitry Podolsky on June 10, 2009 at 10:11 am
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

Back in April, I already wrote about GRB090423 – currently the most distant detected object in the Universe. Yesterday, two papers with details of mesurement have appeared in astro-ph (unfortunately, Icannot give you the links – see my comment below).

Let me remind you that currently the redshift of the most distant galaxy we observed is about 6.96, of the most distant quasar – 6.43 (redshift values are defined with very good precision), while the redshift of the most distant gamma ray burst (GRB090423) is about 8.3.

The value of the redshift in the latter case is determined by photometry measurements (photometry is not exactly the most precise method we have at our disposal) and from the Lyman-Into dark ages or again about GRB090423 absorption profile (which is much more precise method than photometry). Taking into account that both methods give the same value of the redshift (with corresponding error bars), we can consider the measurement as robust.

Into dark ages or again about GRB090423

In usual Lambda CDM cosmology without any exotics redshift 8.26 corresponds to the age of the Universe 625 million years, and the very detection of the GRB shows that stars were already being born and dying at that time. It is interesting to note that parameters of GRB090423 are pretty much the same as of GRBs detected at lower redshifts – either the mechanics of GRB does not depend on the star much or there were already stars at that time that don’t differ too much from the ones we have today, at Into dark ages or again about GRB090423.

Via sergepolar.

Update: I realized after writing this blogpost that their paper, since it is submitted to Nature, is under press embargo, so I will remove the link to the paper. Honestly saying, I am not sure whether press embargo has any meaning in this particular case. First of all, the news was everywhere in press back in the end of April – for example, NewScientist made a video about it which is right now on Youtube and had about 65000 views already alone apart from its clones. Second, every dog in physics blogosphere (including your huble correspondent) has blogged about it.

3 Comments

  1. Daniel de Fran?a MTd2 says:
    June 10, 2009 at 12:40 pm

    You mean, you cannot post any of these papers?
    http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.1577
    http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.1578

    Reply
  2. Dmitry says:
    June 10, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    :-)

    Yes, it seems so. Check out “Cosmic variance”, they have a rather nice discussion right now featuring one of Nature’s editors.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

  • Twitted by dpodolsky

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.