NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

99. Eternal inflation with many light scalar fields

ASTRO, HEP-TH/PH — By Dmitry Podolsky on November 16, 2008 at 10:52 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

I am going to briefly discuss one result from the recent paper by Peter Adshead, Richard Easther and Eugene Lim.

One subject of the authors’ study is the interplay between stochastic and eternal N-flation. Let us recall what is N-flation (or assisted inflation). Suppose that we have a large number 99. Eternal inflation with many light scalar fields of scalar fields with equal potentials 99. Eternal inflation with many light scalar fields and relatively large vacuum expectation values. How large? We want to have the ordinary slow roll inflation in this setup. While one needs an expectation value of the inflaton to be superplanckian in single field inflationary models in order for slow roll conditions to hold, expectation values of any one among N scalar fields can be rather small and still the inflationary slow roll regime will not be spoiled. Indeed, we have

99. Eternal inflation with many light scalar fields,

and 99. Eternal inflation with many light scalar fields is sufficiently large even for small 99. Eternal inflation with many light scalar fields. Now, we notice that generally during one Hubble time there are fluctuations of the field 99. Eternal inflation with many light scalar fields with the wavelength of the quasi de Sitter horizon and the characteristic amplitude of the order of 99. Eternal inflation with many light scalar fields. Again, we see that there is one more amplification effect in N-flation compared to the single field inflation: the quantum fluctuations of individual scalar fields in N-flation are generally stronger than in a single field inflation (the amplitude amplification is proportional to 99. Eternal inflation with many light scalar fields). As a result, the regime of stochastic inflation (see my lectures on stochastic inflation) for an individual field is generally achieved earlier for N-flation than for a single field inflation.

All this is rather clear, but the authors indicate the following thing which does not yet belong to the general lore: for N-flation, stochastic inflation of an individual field is not the same as the regime of eternal inflation! Indeed, in this setup eternal inflation would mean self-reproduction regime such that the classical displacement of the “mean field”

99. Eternal inflation with many light scalar fields

during one Hubble time is of the same order as the characteristic amplitude of the quantum fluctuation 99. Eternal inflation with many light scalar fields. Clearly, this regime is established at much higher values of 99. Eternal inflation with many light scalar fields than the regime of stochastic inflation for a single individual field 99. Eternal inflation with many light scalar fields.
In other words, for a single field inflation the onset of stochastic regime is synonymous to the amplitude of density fluctuations exceeding unity. For N-flation, stochastic regime is turned on at much lower amplitudes of density fluctuations.

Note that for both cases amplitude of density fluctuations exceeding unity=eternal inflation. This is a very generic and model-independent but (unfortunately) not very well known statement.

0 Comments

You can be the first one to leave a comment.

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.