NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

326. House market bubble: brief update

Uncategorized — By Dmitry Podolsky on March 29, 2009 at 8:05 am
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

As usual on Sundays, science will be temporarily forgotten, because I would like to share many other things with you. This Sunday I am going to talk about again only global financial crisis.

You are probably eager to know how US house market is currently doing, since the it was the bubble burst on this sector of the global economy which initiated global crisis’ take-off. Kindly allow me to report – it is not doing very well, at least the bottom does not seem to be achieved yet… Below you’ll find four rather interesting plots, which, I think, allow to get correct overall impression of the situation on house market. Also, they do show that this crisis is indeed somewhat different from, say, .com bubble.

The first plot shows the number of newly bought houses per 1000 US tax payers:

326. House market bubble: brief update

As you see, currently a little bit more that 1 house/1000 people is bought – not just the absolute minimum for the last 46 years, but this minimum is almost 3 times lower than the average.

The next plot is ratio of the median price of a new house to average annual personal income in US.

326. House market bubble: brief update

In the past market has achieved attractor corresponding to the value of this ratio 326. House market bubble: brief update 6. Currently, it is is well below 6 – that is, Americans are not quite willing to buy new houses. It is also interesting to note that the upper bound of the ratio is about 8. This upper bound was rarely tested and even more rarely broken, that is,
not so many Americans were/are ready to pay more than 8 their annual incomes in order to to buy a house.

The third plot is average price of new house on the market corrected to inflation (we have recently learned that in order to plot meaningful quantities, inflation should be taken into account).

326. House market bubble: brief update

As you see, the nice robust trend held from 1963 – growth of the corrected price – is currently broken, and this is exactly, from my point of view, what shows how special is this situation compared to glorious dot com years and 1980s.

Finally, the average amount of time needed to sell a house (in months) is presented on the plot below.

326. House market bubble: brief update

The market seems to be a bit overfull right now (by the way, the situation here in Helsinki is similar, especially regarding the segment of expensive houses – many of them are on sale for several months now, as my weekly walks to Westend show 326. House market bubble: brief update ). So, what do you think – is it a good idea to buy new house in US nowadays?

Via ugfx.

2 Comments

    Leave a Comment

    Click here to cancel reply.


    For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

    Login with Facebook:

    or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

    Trackback responses to this post

    • Topics about Economy » Archive » 326. House market bubble: brief update
    • NEQNET: last two weeks of March | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena

    Related Posts

    • No Related Post
    • Comments
    • Login
    • Search
    • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
      January 31, 2012 14:01
    • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
      March 18, 2011 20:03
    • Relaunching NEQNET
      January 20, 2011 21:01
    • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
      June 20, 2009 19:06
    • Dynamics of space storm
      June 19, 2009 12:06
    • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
    • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
    • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
    • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
    • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
    • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
    • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
    • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
    • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
      Register,
      login with your NEQNET profile
      or login with Facebook:

      • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
        • 33 comments
      • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
        • 33 comments
      • The very meaning of socialism
        • 26 comments
      • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
        • 26 comments
      • Biocentrism: book review
        • 24 comments

    Facebook: Community

    Facebook: Your Friends

    Google Friend Connect

    Links: Journals

    Links: Resources

    Links: Blogs

    • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
    Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.