NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

Newcomer?

Let me warmly welcome you at NEQNET!

My name is Dmitry Podolsky, I am a professional theoretical physicist currently working at the Helsinki Institute of Physics, the University of Helsinki, Finland.
Newcomer? My main interests are related to (but not limited to) general relativity and cosmology, turbulence, quantum field theory and string theory, dynamical chaos – everything related to physics and mathematics of systems far from equilibrium. If you are not sure what it is all about Newcomer? , I would advice you to check out the Best posts section, but basically what you will find on this blog is mostly about theoretical physics, its methods and their numerous applications – for example, to quantitative analysis of markets.

More precisely, here is a rough classification of all the posts on NEQNET:

  • First class of posts on this blog mostly includes posts about different mathematical methods developed to treat dynamical systems in extreme regimes (such as strong coupling). As it turns out, these methods can often be useful for the description of various phenomena in evolutionary biology, sociology and markets. I think those posts could be of interest for you even if you are not a theoretical physicist.

  • I also consider this blog as my scientific diary, and another class of my blog posts is devoted to the discussion of problems I am currently working on.

  • Finally, the third wide class of posts on this blog includes discussion of open problems in physics, mathematics, biology and quantitative analysis of markets, problems that essentially define what is cutting edge of science today.

Cutting edge science

Genrich Altshuller, developer of the theory of inventive problem solving (aka TRIZ), once made a statement that all inventive problems can be classified according to their intrinsic complexity. Let me follow his logic and introduce here a simple classification of all scientific problems Newcomer? Namely, I claim that all those problems can be divided into 4 categories:

  1. to solve a problem from the first category completely, you just need to search the body of literature well, because it is probably already solved somewhere by somebody;
  2. if your problem belongs to the second category – you need to apply some well known method from a well developed branch of science to solve the problem;
  3. in order to solve a problem from the third category one has to develop a new method in a well developed branch of science, and, finally,
  4. to approach a scientific problem belonging to the 4th category in my listing, on has to construct a new brunch of science (most probably your problem is interdisciplinary).

Discussing open scientific problems, I will mostly focus on the known problems from 3rd and 4th category from this classification.

Is it readable?

I have introduced quite a nontrivial hierarchical structure for this blog. Any post will belong to a Readability category (Entered Apprentice, Fellow Craft, Master Mason and Master Postdoc). No special knowledge or education is prerequisite for “Entered Apprentice” posts; “Fellow Craft” posts will be probably hard to understand unless you possess a college-level knowledge of the topic I am talking about; “Master Mason” means a PhD level, while “Master Postdoc” posts will probably seem interesting only for specialists in the field.

Also, any post will belong to a particular “topic” category such as cosmology, neuroscience, molecular biology and genetics, etc. You can find the list of “topic” categories on the right side of the front page.

How to subscribe…

If you enjoyed the blog, please feel warmly welcomed to subscribe to my RSS feed or get new posts sent directly to your Inbox.

and contact me

If you would like to contact me, please find the list of possible contact channels here.

With best regards,

Dmitry.

  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.