NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

95. One second order phase transition: video

COND-MAT, HEP-TH/PH — By Dmitry Podolsky on November 13, 2008 at 5:47 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

Discussion of the Shaposhnikov-Tkachev paper has somewhat inspired me as you might expect, and I decided to browse the net for a bit 95. One second order phase transition: video That’s what I have found -

what you see below is a phase transition of the second kind, the one where correct degrees of freedom are decribed by CFT at 95. One second order phase transition: video. Can you guess what is the phase transition and what is the medium it happens in? 95. One second order phase transition: video

Update: As both Theoreticalminimum and Lubos indicate, this is supercritical 95. One second order phase transition: video undergoing phase transition to a gas-liquid mixture. Also, as Lubos have noticed, the corresponding phase transition is actually a higher-order phase transition:

http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/abstract.cgi/jpchax/1996/100/i01/abs/jp951803p.html

i.e., higher derivatives of thermodynamic potentials have a jump.

5 Comments

  1. theoreticalminimum says:
    November 13, 2008 at 7:28 pm

    It looks like supercritical carbon dioxide undergoing phase transition to a gas-liquid mixture.

    Reply
  2. Lubos Motl says:
    November 13, 2008 at 10:45 pm

    Dear Dmitry,

    I don’t want to be picky but the English term for the “second kind” phase transitions are “second order phase transition”.

    And I don’t want you to panic but the transition from the liquid-like to gas-like supercritical CO2 is actually a higher-order phase transition

    http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/ab.....1803p.html

    which might even be somewhat manifest in the video you included because the video is damn continuous and smooth, isn’t it?

    Best
    Lubos

    Reply
  3. Dmitry says:
    November 14, 2008 at 10:18 am

    Hi guys

    theoreticalminimum: It looks like supercritical carbon dioxide undergoing phase transition to a gas-liquid mixture.

    Indeed so. I wonder how you were able to recognize that this is CO2 :-) I have honestly decided not to read the description of the video and thought all the way that this is water near the critical point :-)

    Lubos: I don’t want to be picky but the English term for the “second kind” phase transitions are “second order phase transition”.

    Thank you for being picky. Everything is corrected (in the previous post as well). I have no idea why I used this particular wording.

    Lubos: And I don’t want you to panic

    It is not like I am in panic. Actually, I am petrified and shaken.

    Lubos: the transition from the liquid-like to gas-like supercritical CO2 is actually a higher-order phase transition

    Thanks for the link! I did not know that. Actually, if I would also want to be picky, I would say that “higher-order phase transition” staff belongs to old classification by Ehrenfest, there are only first and second order phase transitions nowadays: the former involve latent heat, the latter – don’t; correlation length is finite for the former and goes to infinity for the latter.

    Lubos: which might even be somewhat manifest in the video you included because the video is damn continuous and smooth, isn’t it?

    Well, for the second order PT thermodynamic potentials change smoothly, and I don’t think one would be able to notice a jump in first derivatives.

    Cheers,

    Reply
  4. Lubos Motl says:
    November 17, 2008 at 11:39 am

    Dear Dmitry,

    I think that a jump in the first derivatives would be way too manifest. For example, if the stock market goes down and suddenly it starts to go up, you will notice. The same thing holds for other bubbles’ sizes in physics, too.

    But a continuous free energy and a discontinuous first derivative is not what defines the second order phase transition: it is exactly a definition of the first order phase transition. ;-)

    Whether the second order phase transition is visible is a question whether you can “see” the jump in the second derivatives of the thermodynamic potentials, and I tend to think that even this is possible. For example, if bubbles grow uniformly, linearly and suddenly they start to grow exponentially, you may also notice, although it’s harder.

    Best
    Lubos

    Reply
  5. Dmitry says:
    November 17, 2008 at 12:04 pm

    Hi Lubos

    I think that a jump in the first derivatives would be way too manifest. For example, if the stock market goes down and suddenly it starts to go up, you will notice. The
    same thing holds for other bubbles? sizes in physics, too.

    Second derivatives of course – that’s what I meant. Sometimes my fingers (and neurons) do mis-shoot, probably, because I want to focus on too many things simultaneously :-)

    For example, if bubbles grow uniformly, linearly and suddenly they start to grow exponentially, you may also notice, although it?s harder.

    Second order phase transition is supposed to be completely smooth, the growth of bubbles of the new phase only takes place for a first order phase transition.

    I tend to think that even this is possible.

    As follows from your previous comment, you actually tend to think that it is possible to notice the jump in derivatives higher than 2nd, which seems quite unlikely to me.

    Appreciated your stock market irony ;-)
    Cheers,

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.