Book of the week: S. Hawking. A briefer history of time
Powered by MaxBlogPress 

85. Hard thermal loops: what is it?

Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF                                


Suppose that you are a person studying non-equilibrium diagrammatic methods. At some point you realize that in many situations (such as at the time scale of prethermalization in the quark-gluon plasma or soon after the end of preheating) brute-force perturbation theory breaks down, as breaks the description of the dynamics by means of a single kinetic equation (in such case, the whole BBGKY chain of equations is necessary to take into account). In order to describe your strongly coupled plasma and deal with full BBGKY chain, you need to develop some non-perturbative methods, and very soon you figure out that not so many of them are currently on the market.

One of such non-perturbative methods is hard thermal loop effective field theory . So, what is it all about? If plasma of massless paricles is in thermal equilibrium, the only scale that appears in the theory is the temperature T, corresponding to the mean energy of particles in the plasma. The Debye screening mass is determined in turn by the scale gT\ll T, where g is the self-interaction coupling for plasma particles. There are no propagating modes in plasma below the Debye scale.

The term “hard thermal loops” takes its origin from the fact that Debye screening is given by loop contributions with the highest power of loop momentum. The latter is cut off by the temperature T, i.e., these loops are hard thermal loops. If we want to determine what happens at scales softer than gT (and time scales longer than (gT)^{-1}), we have to correspondingly resum propagators and vertices; this resummation gives rise to the hard thermal loop (HTL) effective field theory.

There are other important scales in the theory where not only naive perturbation theory, but also the resummed HTL effective QFT  cease to work. One such scale is g^2 T, where magnetostatic sector becomes involved, and another is g^4 T – the scale related to inverse shear viscosity T^4/\eta in plasma. Nevertheless, HTL analysis may be sufficient if one considers dynamics of plasma far from the equilibrium. The reason is that this dynamics is almost completely determined by instabilities in plasma, and the latter are seen already in collisionless limit (recall, say, physics of repeating), i.e., at the level of HTL masses.

  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

If you liked the post, please kindly consider to leave a comment, subscribe to the RSS feed or get new posts sent directly to your Inbox. If you want to chat with me in real time, you can find me on Twitter. The posts below are probably related to the subject of this one:

97. Second week of November on NEQNET
The very meaning of socialism
Other interesting things in ArXiv (11 Jun 2009)
145. Quantum and thermal decay in de Sitter space
26. Eye on ArXiv: 24 Apr 2008 – NSR superstring measures

RSS feed | Trackback URI

Comments »

No comments yet.

Please, enter your name (required)
e-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
or login via Facebook by clicking the button below
Your comment (smaller size | larger size)
For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

« Back to text comment
or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post