<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 71. More talks: M2 branes and AdS/CFT, correlations of low multipoles in CMB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonequilibrium.net/71-talks-m2-branes-adscft-correlations-multipoles-cmb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/71-talks-m2-branes-adscft-correlations-multipoles-cmb/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>For physicts by physicists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/71-talks-m2-branes-adscft-correlations-multipoles-cmb/comment-page-1/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=159#comment-571</guid>
		<description>Dear Rutger

Most certainly so! although the usual thing that non-canonical QG people (for example, LQG people Lubos loves some much) like to keep up is the question of background independence of the quantum gravity.

Also,  the AdS background is somewhat special (admits closed timelike curves, but one is usually interested in universal covering space of AdS in AdS/CFT), but even to understand what happens in the vicinity of the AdS space is quite a problem (see for example Strominger&#039;s and Carlip&#039;s recent activity).

Cheers,
Dmitry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Rutger</p>
<p>Most certainly so! although the usual thing that non-canonical QG people (for example, LQG people Lubos loves some much) like to keep up is the question of background independence of the quantum gravity.</p>
<p>Also,  the AdS background is somewhat special (admits closed timelike curves, but one is usually interested in universal covering space of AdS in AdS/CFT), but even to understand what happens in the vicinity of the AdS space is quite a problem (see for example Strominger&#8217;s and Carlip&#8217;s recent activity).</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dmitry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rutger</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/71-talks-m2-branes-adscft-correlations-multipoles-cmb/comment-page-1/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>rutger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=159#comment-568</guid>
		<description>As someone pointed out to me AdS4/CFT3 is also interesting if you are halfway interested in understanding quantum gravity in 4 dimensions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone pointed out to me AdS4/CFT3 is also interesting if you are halfway interested in understanding quantum gravity in 4 dimensions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

