NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

5. The Universe is expanding (Inflationary perturbations 1)

ASTRO — By Dmitry Podolsky on March 17, 2008 at 4:51 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

This is the 3rd post in the series based on my lectures on inflationary perturbations at the University of Helsinki (previous ones can be found here and here).

Today I am going to finally start constructing some theoretical basis for the future posts on inflationary perturbations 5. The Universe is expanding (Inflationary perturbations 1)

Probably, the most important observation ever made by an astronomer is that the Universe is actually expanding. Moreover, as it turns out, it is expanding according to the linear Hubble law: distant objects are running away from us with velocity

5. The Universe is expanding (Inflationary perturbations 1)

proportional to the distance between us and them. You are certainly well aware of it already but I would still want to emphisize a couple of points related to the way how the expansion of the Universe is actually detected. To check the Hubble law, one needs to make al least two independent observations: to measure velocity of the object (galaxy, supernova etc.) and to measure the distance between us and the object.

The first measurement (velocity) is done as follows. Galaxies as well as other bright sources of radiation on the sky typically have in their spectrum well determined emission and absorbtion lines, so the relative velocity 5. The Universe is expanding (Inflationary perturbations 1) of such a source can be easily determined by its redshift

5. The Universe is expanding (Inflationary perturbations 1),

where 5. The Universe is expanding (Inflationary perturbations 1) is the velocity of light.

The second measurement (distance) is much trickier. Distances within our galaxy can be measured by parallax (for example, as you remember, Proxima Centauri 1 pc away from us has a parallax 1 arcsec). On the other hand, galaxies at the distance of few Mpcs (millions of parsecs) have an unmeasurable parallax < 1 milliarcsec, so the parallax measurement is of no help to determine the distance to them.

In practice, one uses the concept of standard candle at distances larger than 100 Pcs. Standard candle is an object which emits light in some particular well known way (for example, we know very well the physics behind emission processes), has a known brightness. One example of such class of objects is Type 1a supernovae which blow up in very similar way everywhere around the Universe (i.e., parameters of their blow up such as the change of brightness with time are the same).

To determine distances to galaxy clusters, we also use brightness-distance relations (considering only similar clusters, picking the brightest galaxies in the cluster and using the 5. The Universe is expanding (Inflationary perturbations 1) law to determine the distance from the flux of photons sourced by these galaxies), period-luminocity relations finding cepheid variable stars in galaxies (cepheids are also remarkable standard candles), Tully-Fisher relation (relation between the stellar mass of a spiral galaxy and the ampltude of its rotation curve) and many other methods.

The bottom line is that these different methods used to measure distance give the same Hubble law determining how rapidly distant objects are running away from us. On the picture below (W. Friedman et al.) you can see results of actual observations. Up to the distance of 100 MPcs away from us, there are tons of data since we are able to resolve fine structure of clusters (and galaxies at smaller scales). However, at larger distances there are simply no so many bright sources of radiation (and only IIa supernovae are standard candles among them).

5. The Universe is expanding (Inflationary perturbations 1)

I will discuss supernovae (and Ia in particular) the next time.

If you liked this post, please consider subscribing to my RSS feed.

0 Comments

You can be the first one to leave a comment.

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.