Recent posts: R. Biswas. Cosmological parameters in the context of time varying w
Powered by MaxBlogPress 

48. Planck 2008: day 3

Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF                                


The third day of the conference started with the talk by Daniel Froideveaux (CERN) about experimental side of the LHC. Some facts which were not of great importance for me, but still somehow I’ve managed to remember them from the talk:

David also listed some physics which one may expect to be found during years of LHC operation:

etc. etc. Higgs boson’s selfcoupling is probably beyond LHC.

James Wells (CERN & MCTP) continued to discuss the possible expectations and was focused more on the theoretical side. According to him what we might see during LHC first year are dilepton resonances (Z’ and KK), light gravitino SUSY and modified Higgs boson signals. He discussed a lot hidden sectors; what are the possible impications if we will not find Higgs at LHC (basically, he said, Higgs mixing is the way out).

Matt Strassler continued the discussion of hidden sectors with particular focus on hidden valley scenario. Hidden valley scenario is the scenario when confining gauge interaction in the hidden sector leads to the existence of bound states with relatively low mass (smaller than 1 TeV, although coupling to the hidden sector proceeds through the operators suppressed at 1 TeV). As he said, hidden valley events are mostly characterized by multiplicity of jets and leptons in the final state, and events
are typically more spherical than those from the SM background processes. He also mentioned that unparticle models (see below) with mass gaps are in fact examples of hidden valley scenarios.

Next, Markus Luty (UCLA Davis) discussed quirks. The idea is the following. Suppose the hidden sector is QCD like (say, it represents the gauge theory with SO(N) group and fermions Q) with confinement scale <1 TeV. On the other hand, the particles Q in the hidden sector have the masses of the order of 1 TeV. If so, it is hard to break the hidden-QCD string, and the latter instead can get stretched to the macroscopic scales. Suppose that quirks Q also carry usual QCD colors. If the hidden-QCD string is oscillating, the usual QCD staff gets also excited. As a result, we should see some effects of quirk physics in QCD processes above 1 TeV scale – for example, distribution of hardrons into jets may have a surprosing form.

Next after Markus, Mikhail Shifman discussed his two papers about flux tubes in N=1 SQCD (although he was clearly planning to discuss something less – unfortunately, he ddi not have enough time), and that talk was a revelation for me. In a few words, the thing is the following. There exists an extremely old idea (by ‘t Hooft and Mandelstam) that confinement in non-abelian gauge theories is nothing but the dual Meissner effect: similarly to the way how magnetic monopoles get connected by the flux tube (string) in QED, quarks (electric degrees of freedom) get connected by the tube of electric QCD flux. As we know, this idea turned out to be precisely correct for N=2 SQCD (Seiberg-Witten), but for N=1 SQCD (as well as confining non-SUSY QCD) the situation looked more complicated. Shifman says that they were able to construct correct dual degrees of freedom for N=1 SQCD and the corresponding theory on the world sheet (flux tube is the string) turns out to be CP(N-1) sigma model. I don’t quite understand the physics of this and want to learn more, so I will definitely write more about N=1 SQCD strings in the future.

  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

If you liked the post, please kindly consider to leave a comment, subscribe to the RSS feed or get new posts sent directly to your Inbox. If you want to chat with me in real time, you can find me on Twitter. The posts below are probably related to the subject of this one:

46. Leaving for Planck 2008
241. Twitter updates for 2009-02-08
43. Schwinger-Keldysh: Martin-Siggia-Rose diagrammatics (non-equilibrium diagrammatic methods 2)
50. Planck 2008: day 4
162. Five most important things that happened to me in 2008

RSS feed | Trackback URI

Comments »

No comments yet.

Please, enter your name (required)
e-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
or login via Facebook by clicking the button below
Your comment (smaller size | larger size)
For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

« Back to text comment
or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post