NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

40. Inflation: field-theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4)

ASTRO — By Dmitry Podolsky on May 9, 2008 at 10:52 am
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

This is the next post in the series based on my lectures on cosmological perturbations. Last time I discussed how inflation can be described only in terms of effective equation of state (with negative pressure). Today I am going to show how this equation of state can be realized at the quasi-classical level of QFT.

In order to describe the physics of inflation, a QFT model should have a distinctive feature: its hydrodynamic modes (i.e., such modes that their relaxation time goes to infinity while the wavelength goes to infinity) have to be described by the effective equation of state 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4). As a simple working example, let us consider a self-interacting scalar field 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) with potential 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4); at the level of phenomenology it can be a fundamental or a composite field (condensate of some kind).

The energy density stored in the hydrodynamic modes of \varphi is given by

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) (1)

while the corresponding pressure is

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) (2)

The realization of the de Sitter stage is possible if the kinetic energy of the scalar field is negligible compared to its potential energy. More precisely, expansion of the Universe will accelerate if

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) (3)

Indeed, as follows from the Eqs. (1) and (2), 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) and 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) in this case, so the Universe is de Sitter-like.

Dynamics of inflationary stage is the determined by the equation of motion for the scalar field

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) (4)

where the friction term is defined by the Friedmann equation

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) (5)

When the slow roll conditions (3) are valid, Hubble friction in the Eq. (5) dominates over the kinetic term and scalar field starts to slowly roll down towards the minimum of its potential. In this regime, one effectively has

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) (6)

(where 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) is again the number of e-folds) with the solution

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4)

determining the number of e-folds of accelerated expansion 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) as a function of 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) (please note that the number of e-folds turns out to be a more appropriate variable than the physical time 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) during accelerated expansion stage; there is a deep physics in this statement, as we will see later when will discuss stochastic approach to eternal inflation). De Sitter stage can start at some

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4)

such that 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) and continue until the conditions (3) break down at 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) The value of the Hubble parameter

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4)

will slowly (40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4)) decrease from 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) to 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4), while the value of scale factor will quasiexponentially grow.

Let us show what happens explicitly taking the simplest possible model with potential

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4).

Slow roll conditions (3) are satisfied when

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4)

i.e., in the very wide range of possible values of 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) if 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4). From the Eq. (6) we find

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4)

Therefore, the Hubble parameter decreases quadratically with time, while the scale factor grows as

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4)

where 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) is its value in the end of inflation. The overall length of the de Sitter stage is given by

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4)

while the total number of e-folds accumulated during inflation is

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4)

where we took 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) consistent with COBE normalization. As we see, the overall de Sitter stage could be extremely long, and the the size of homogeneous isotropic region by many orders of magnitude may exceed the present horizon size. Only last 60 or so e-folds of inflation give rise to the structure of the gravitational potential seen at near-horizon scale in the present universe.

The last thing remained to be explained in this Section is the Hamilton-Jacobi formalism for inflation. Often, it is more convenient to represent the Hubble parameter 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) as a function of field 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) itself (of course, this can be done only if the field 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) changes monothonically with time). Second order differential equation (4) is equivalent to a pair of equations for the field and the Hubble parameter

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4)

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) (7)

The Eq. (7) is known as the Hamilton-Jacobi equation for inflation. Defining the slow roll parameter

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4)

one can rewrite it as

40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4)

The meaning for the slow roll parameter 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) is clear from the Friedmann equation 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) – it shows how rapidly effective cosmological constant changes with time. The reason why we mention the Gamilton-Jacobi equation here is that inflationary observables are typically represented as functions of slow roll parameter(s) and the Hubble scale 40. Inflation: field theoretic description (Inflationary perturbations 4) at a given scale, not at a given time.

0 Comments

You can be the first one to leave a comment.

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.