NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

39. Schwinger-Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non-equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1)

COND-MAT, HEP-TH/PH — By Dmitry Podolsky on May 9, 2008 at 10:29 am
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

The is a continuation of the series of posts devoted to the discussion of non-equilibrium diagrammatic methods. Last time we discussed what information is carried by different Keldysh Green’s functions. Today I want to finally start alking about dynamics and will determine saddle points of the Schwinger-Keldysh action.

The trivial saddle point of the generating functional

39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1)

rewritten in terms of quantum and classical Keldysh fields

39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1)

39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1)

is determined by the equations

39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1)

and

39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1),

where 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1) is retarded operator desribing the dynamics of the classical Keldysh field. One can immediately see that 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1) on the trivial saddle point, and 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1). In fact, the latter remains true even if one considers fluctuations near this saddle point.

To consider the quasiclassical limit, fluctuations of 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1) should be allowed near the classical trajectory. Let us keep only terms up to the second order in 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1) in the Keldysh action. The semiclassical action will have the following form

39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1)

where 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1) denotes the complex conjugation.

One simple way to treat this semiclassical theory is to use the Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation introducing the auxiliary stochastic field 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1) and decoupling the quadratic term in the quasiclasical equation. One will find that the resulting action is linear with respect to 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1), i.e., the integration over 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1) leads to the functional 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1)-function and to the stochastic Langevin equation

39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1) (1)

where

39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1)

Another way to deal with the semiclassical theory is to integrate the 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1) field out completely since its contribution into the action is quadratic. The result is the theory of the classical Keldysh field

39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1)

If non-linearities with respect to 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1) are neglected, the theory is nothing else but the free field theory with a very complicated propagator. Using first quantized version of this theory, one can show that dynamics of the probability 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1) to find a particle excitation in the point 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1) at time 39. Schwinger Keldysh: Quasiclassical Keldysh action (non equilibrium diagrammatic methods 1) is governed by the Fokker-Planck equation. Of course, this is not suprprising since, as we have shown, variation of the classical limit of the Schwinger-Keldysh equation gives the the Langevin equation (1).

In fact, the opposite procedure is possible: one can start from a Langevin/Fokker-Planck equation (or, generally speaking, with any equation describing diffusive dynamics) and construct a classical limit of the correponding Schwinger-Keldysh diagrammatic technique. This procedure was first introduced by Martin, Siggia and Rose and we will discuss it the next time.

0 Comments

You can be the first one to leave a comment.

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.