NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future

HEP-TH/PH — By Dmitry Podolsky on March 13, 2009 at 11:30 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

If you have already seen “Wathchmen” (and/or have read the Moore’s graphic novel), recall that one of the main pillars of the storyline is the fact that Adrian Veidt (Ozymandias) used generators of tachyons located in his playboy hideout in Antarctica to prevent Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future and being able to affect Veidt’s plot of saving humanity from self-destruction.

304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future

So, how did the trick work exactly (and does it have any meaning to even talk about tachyons in the real world)?

304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future

Tachyons are hypothetical particles moving with the speed faster than the speed of light in vacuum 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future km/s. Probably, the first person who thought about them in a constructive way was Eugene Wigner (photo on the left), a genius (well, almost every physicist of that generation was genius, isn’t it true? 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future ) who was also the first to introduce group theoretical methods in physics. He has basically figured out that one of the irreducible representations of the Lorentz group contains tachyons.

But physics of tachyons is surely more interesting than their history… The first interesting feature of a tachyon is that its mass is actually imaginary. Let us check this explicitly. The relativistic relation between the energy 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future of the particle and its momentum 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future reads

304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future,

where 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future is the velocity of the particle. The mass of the particle squared is in turn given by

304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future.

Therefore, if the velocity of the particle 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future, then 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future, and the mass of the tachyon itself is indeed imaginary.

This is actually a very serious problem since the energy of the tachyon decreases with velocity growth:

304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future

(note that 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future is real and positive in the formula above). So, it is energetically favourable for tachyons to move faster and faster (infinite speed 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future corresponds to vacuum 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future!), and it is possible for us to steal energy from tachyons – and provide an infinite source of energy for Humanity’s needs. Maybe that’s exactly how Veidt wanted to solve energy problems of the Mankind in the movie 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future

Anyway, let us now see how he tricked Dr. Manhattan using generators of tachyons. The reason why Dr. Manhattan played damn fool is a contradiction between existence of (free) tachyons and causality. What does exactly the word “causality” mean in special relativity? The meaning is actually very simple: the timing (sequence) of two events related by a signal exchange can never be inverted by a coordinate transformation (that is, transformation of the reference frame). In other words, cause is always earlier than the effect in arbitrary frame of reference, which sounds quite reasonable, doesn’t it?

Let us now see explicitly how tachyons allow to violate causality. Let us consider two spacetime events 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future and 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future related by a tachyonic signal exchange:

304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future, 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future.

In the reference frame that moves with a velocity 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future such that

304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future

we have

304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future,

i.e., cause and effect were exchanged. That’s exactly the reason why Dr. Manhattan could not foresee the future. The poor guy was probably able to see all events but wasn’t able to rearrange them into a sequence – to figure out what causes what 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future

Well, let me ramble a little bit more… Tachyons, if they exist, cannot carry information. They can connect events, though, if by connection we understand that events are equivalent (whatever this crap means). For example, there is always a reference frame where the tachyon propagates with infinite speed, i.e., it is emitted and absorbed in different space points at the same moment of time 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future (so yes, if you allow tachyons, then relativity is dead as a concept and we are back to Galileo era).

304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future

Via Abstruse Goose.

To conclude this rambling, let me mention that the lowest energy state in non-critical string theory (as well as critical bosonic string theory) is a tachyon (its 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future), which allows many people to argue that the vacuum of non-critical string theory is unstable and may only achive stability after tachyon condensation.

So, if Adrian Veidt was able to figure out how non-critical string theory works and even get string theoretic effects in the lab, he could indeed be considered as the smartest man in the world 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future

Update (by Haelfix): For completeness sake, the story doesn?t quite end there and makes for further interesting scifi possibilities, though of course it does becomes more and more controversial depending on who you talk with. You could mention the Feinberg reinterpretion of tachyons, where such things do NOT violate causality b/c they do not carry information into their past light cone.

Scalar fields in spontaneous symmetry breaking are also examples of the condensation and vacuum instability.

Update (by Lubos Motl): The “stealing” of energy from tachyons is pretty much the same process as the tachyonic fields rolling down from the hill, signaling the instability.

Tachyons? energy cannot be kept positive in a Lorentz-invariant way – whether it?s positive or not depends on the reference frame. So the fastest way to steal energy is to give tachyons a huge negative energy. Because it can be much greater than the absolute value of the tachyon rest mass, tachyonic particle-antiparticle pairs can be spontaneously created from the vacuum (with momenta which are spacelike and opposite; there is no separation between the set of positive-energy and negative-energy momenta for them).

A (multiple pair) creation of tachyons is a microscopic description of the process of rolling down the hill. In a fock basis, the coherent states moving the tachyon field away from the unstable maximum correspond to many particle excitations.

Only theories which contain at least metastable minima of the potential, aside from the unstable maxima, can support a world where physicists have enough time to make experiments. 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future

Further reading

1. Brian Greene. Elegant Universe. Superstrings, hidden dimensions and the quest for the ultimate theory.
2. Barton Zwiebach. First course in string theory (2nd Edition).

Update: In order to check how carefully you read the post, I’ve planted a picture of Enrico Fermi instead of Eugene Wigner in the earlier version of the post 304. Science in Watchmen. How Ozymandias prevented Dr. Manhattan from seeing the future Kudos for discovering my terrible plot go to Massimo Bedini.

8 Comments

  1. Haelfix says:
    March 14, 2009 at 12:39 am

    For completeness sake, the story doesn’t quite end there and makes for further interesting scifi possibilities, though of course it does becomes more and more controversial depending on who you talk with. You could mention the Feinberg reinterpretion of tachyons, where such things do NOT violate causality b/c they do not carry information into their past light cone.

    Scalar fields in spontaneous symmetry breaking are also examples of the condensation and vacuum instability.

    Reply
  2. Lubos Motl says:
    March 14, 2009 at 9:00 am

    Hi Dmitry, nice writing and a funny cartoon.

    The “stealing” of energy from tachyons is pretty much the same process as the tachyonic fields rolling down from the hill, signaling the instability.

    Tachyons’ energy cannot be kept positive in a Lorentz-invariant way – whether it’s positive or not depends on the reference frame. So the fastest way to steal energy is to give tachyons a huge negative energy. Because it can be much greater than the absolute value of the tachyon rest mass, tachyonic particle-antiparticle pairs can be spontaneously created from the vacuum (with momenta which are spacelike and opposite; there is no separation between the set of positive-energy and negative-energy momenta for them).

    A (multiple pair) creation of tachyons is a microscopic description of the process of rolling down the hill. In a fock basis, the coherent states moving the tachyon field away from the unstable maximum correspond to many particle excitations.

    Only theories which contain at least metastable minima of the potential, aside from the unstable maxima, can support a world where physicists have enough time to make experiments. ;-)

    Reply
  3. Andrea Bedini says:
    March 14, 2009 at 10:58 am

    Hi Dmitry, great post … but isn’t that Enrico Fermi ? :P

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      March 14, 2009 at 11:07 am

      Haha, yes, it is :-) Kudos to you, you were the only one who noticed :-)

      Reply
  4. Andrea Bedini says:
    March 14, 2009 at 11:51 am

    Actually, kudos goes to my brother that pointed this out to me.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

  • 305. First two weeks of March on NEQNET
  • 309. Video of the day: Quantum revolution
  • Nice visualizations of elementary particles: video of the day | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.