NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model

HEP-TH/PH — By Thomas Kelley on March 2, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

This is a guest post by Tom Kelley from the U. of Minnesota who works on AdS/QCD with Tony Gherghetta. Dmitry.

291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model I would like to thank Dmitry for inviting me to talk a little about chiral symmetry breaking in the soft-wall AdS/QCD model, a topic in my recent work “Chiral Symmetry Breaking in Soft-Wall AdS/QCD” (arXiv:hep-ph/0902.1998). In this post, I’d like to paint, in broad strokes, the picture of how AdS/QCD incorporates chiral symmetry breaking.

At the end of the 20th century, several papers laid the groundwork for Anti-de Sitter Space/Conformal Field Theory (AdS/CFT) correspondence, relating type IIB string theory on 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model to 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model Super Yang-Mills (SYM) theory (arXiv:hep-th/9711200, arXiv:hep-th/9802109, arXiv:hep-th/9802150, arXiv:hep-th/9905104). This correspondence led to an effective dictionary relating strongly-coupled gauge field theories to higher-dimensional, weakly-coupled gravity theories. Such a correspondence removes the main difficulty of strongly-coupled systems, the breakdown of perturbative calculations. By relating strong-coupled systems to weakly-coupled analogs, perturbative  calculations are again valid and can be carried out with relative ease. Two methods are employed to formulate models using AdS/CFT correspondence: top-down and bottom-up. A top-down method uses a version of string theory to calculate an effective Lagrangian that, it is hoped, will contain certain characteristics of QCD. A bottom-up approach, commonly known as AdS/QCD, uses the basic tenets of QCD in d dimensions to formulate a dual gravity theory in AdS291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model. Of course, constructing an AdS dual theory describing the richness of QCD presents a great challenge. Some may argue it isn’t possible with such simple assumptions in AdS/QCD. However, some aspects of this model come tantalizingly close to experimental results, I feel that an attempt is well worth it. In our work, we implemented a bottom-up approach evolving from the work of Randall, Erlich, Da Rold, and Karch (arXiv:hep-ph/9905221, arXiv:hep-ph/0501128, arXiv:hep-ph/0501218, arXiv:hep-ph/0602229).

Let’s begin with the question, what is chiral symmetry?

Chiral symmetry is a well-known property of massless fermions and is broken spontaneously and explicitly in QCD. The symmetry is easily seen from the Dirac Lagrangian,

291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model.

Expressing the quark spinor in chiral components 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model,

we can rewrite the fermionic Lagrangian in Weyl representation as

291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model.

For 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model, right- and left-handed states can transform independently; in fact, for a particular number of quark flavors, 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model, the Lagrangian contains a 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model symmetry. But most of us want to describe massive particles, so for 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model, right- and left-handed states mix and explicitly break the chiral symmetry. The QCD vacuum is responsible for the spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry. The strong dynamics of QCD drive the composite field, 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model, to obtain a nonzero value in the vacuum, a purely non-perturbative effect,

291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model

often called the chiral condensate. According to the Nambu-Goldstone theorem, for every spontaneously broken symmetry, a massless boson appears with quantum numbers corresponding to the broken symmetry. The pions are considered the Goldstone bosons of the spontaneous chiral breaking, only acquiring mass from the massive quarks. Much as the non-zero mass in our Lagrangian, the QCD vacuum mixes the chiral states, breaking the 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model symmetry.

Spontaneous and explicit breaking of chiral symmetry affect meson mass spectra independently. The explicit breaking is put into the theory by hand and influences all quark states. Spontaneous breaking eliminates the degeneracy between the vector and the axial-vector mesons. An AdS/QCD model must incorporate two independent sources describing both of these breakings if there is any hope to connect it to reality.

How does AdS/QCD describe chiral symmetry breaking?

Chiral symmetry in QCD appears to revolve around the dimension-3 operator 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model. According to the AdS/CFT dictionary, for every operator, 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model, of dimension 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model in the now broken CFT in d dimensions, a scalar field with mass

291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model

is introduced. The scalar field S obtains a 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model-dependent vacuum expectation value whose asymptotic solution is of the form

291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model,

where 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model corresponds to the quark mass (hep-th/9905104). One can now can derive equations of motion from a 5-d action,

291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model,

where 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model is the soft-wall dilaton and 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model the vector (axial-vector) gauge fields. The equations of motion become

291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model

291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model

291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model,

where 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model, 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model the 5-d coupling constant, and n the resonance number. Most obviously, the equation for the vector meson is similar to that describing the axial-vector meson. The presence of the scalar VEV, 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model, indeed breaks the chiral symmetry, since the term 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model causes a mass splitting between the vector and the axial-vector mesons in this model.

It can also be shown from the equations of motion that we may choose to parametrize 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model such that 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model and 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model in the IR region. The former behavior allows for the observed Regge behavior of 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model, and the latter suggest no chiral restoration, i.e. vector and axial-vector mesons maintain a constant mass splitting even as 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model. This parameterization has the added bonus of allowing the introduction of explicit AND spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking. Previously in the soft-wall model, the small 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model-behavior of 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model has always taken the form

291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model

where 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model. As a result, taking the chiral limit 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model eliminates all chiral symmetry breaking, explicit and spontaneous, leading to no pion. However, taking 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model and solving for the dilaton, we can show that

291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model,

where the quark mass and the chiral condensate can be set independently. Thus, the chiral limit does not destroy spontaneous symmetry breaking. Further, we can derive the Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation in a similar manner as Erlich (hep-ph/0501128), showing that as 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model, the pion mass vanishes.

Incorporating chiral symmetry in the soft-wall AdS/QCD model is non-trivial, but must be done if we are to draw accurate/valid analogies between it and reality, i.e. QCD. Of course, much work and possibly a new framework is needed to accurately describe QCD with gravity duals. What has been shown in (arXiv:hep-ph/0902.1998), though, that at the cost of modifying the dilaton in the UV and introducing another parameter, 291. Chiral symmetry breaking in soft wall AdS/QCD model, we can represent explicit and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking into the soft-wall model in a way not done before.

6 Comments

  1. wei says:
    December 20, 2009 at 7:58 pm

    Thank you for the nice post.
    I really hope I could read it earlier, but I do have a couple of questions about your post and your paper.
    1. In the 5-d action, it seems that the second term including the bulk field have a different sign with the one in hep-ph/0501128.
    2. I don’t think you have included 3 flavors in the 5-d action and thus your fitting of scalar spectrum is quesionable. In the spectroscopy study, the isospin-1 scalar mesons (a_0, like rho and a_1) are more suitable than isospin-0 mesons f_0 as you used.

    Reply
    • Tom Kelley says:
      January 4, 2010 at 11:47 pm

      Thank you for your comment. I would have responded earlier but I have been away during the winter break. As for your questions,
      1. Both 5-d actions are correct, the sign differences arise from our respective choices of metric signature (-++++) or (+—-).
      2. You’re right that this is very much a light quark model which doesn’t necessitate heavier quarks, however, I do not believe that should affect the scalar fitting. If this is a problem I would suspect it would affect the scalar couplings to the vector/axial sectors.
      Also, since the scalar field is dual to  q\bar{q} , the described particle must take the corresponding quantum numbers, which are those of f_0.

      Reply
  2. wei says:
    January 5, 2010 at 11:25 am

    Thank you for your response.
    You are right, one must fit the isosinglet mesons f_0.
    But since there is not heavier quark such as strange quark, in the fitting procedure one can not pick up the mesons made of ssbar. Right?
    In the fitting procedure, the first two scalar mesons are f_0(550)(also refered as sigma) and f_0(980). Although their nature is still on the debate, they could be identified as the mixture of qqbar and ssbar and they have the same principle number (n). It is also similar for the other mesons. So in my opinion, the mesons which are composed of the strange quarks (many people use this kind of spectrum) are inappropriately used.
    Thank you again.

    Reply
  3. Tom Kelley says:
    January 5, 2010 at 6:39 pm

    I agree with you that the f_0 radial excitation spectrum is not fully understood yet, I chose the resonances after evaluating available literature, but still there are a lot of uncertainties. I see now the issue with ssbar; it may be a good think to look into incorporating the ssbar component.

    Reply
  4. wei says:
    January 11, 2010 at 11:07 am

    I have learned a lot from your post and your explanation. Thank you.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

  • 305. First two weeks of March on NEQNET

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • On moduli stabilisation in heterotic orbifolds On moduli stabilisation in heterotic orbifolds
    April 24, 2012 09:04
  • A holographic model of the quantum Hall effect A holographic model of the quantum Hall effect
    April 19, 2012 09:04
  • Transdimensional Multiverse Measures Transdimensional Multiverse Measures
    April 18, 2012 11:04
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Neeta Mohla: Hello, Dr. Dmitry I'm a science enthusiast and read yr review of biocentrism. I've been sceptical on both sides an...
  • Momchil: I want to ask the experts about an apparent confusion, that appears in many papers on the Unruh effect. As you stat...
  • Paul: Excellent list! how lucky you are to be involved in the effort to solve some of these. On time, I question its re...
  • philbert: Simple illustration and may apply to mixed layer boundary layers, how about the stable and other types of boundary ...
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 34 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 25 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.