29. Eye on ArXiv: 28 Apr 2008 – D3/D7 brane inflation

I would like to briefly discuss the paper

Michael Haack, Renata Kallosh, Axel Krause, Andrei Linde, Dieter Lust, Marco Zagermann, “Update of D3/D7-Brane Inflation on K3 x T^2/Z_2″

released last friday. As follows from the title, the paper is about inflationary scenario ( and it is huge).

The scenario works as follows: D3 and D7 branes get attracted to each other due to the presence of a non-self-dual world volume flux on a D7-brane. If both branes are spacetime-filling, and the D7-brane wraps K3, the transverse interbrane distance on plays the role of the inflaton. Compactification geometry is not warped.

There are two issues in this paper being of particular interest to me.

a) Cosmic strings in scenario

As we know, basically all stringly inspired D-brane inflationary modes (KKLMMT, for example) suffer from the -problem (the second slow roll parameter turns out generally of the order of 1 in this models). This feature is generic for all SUGRA F-term inflationary models.

is instead a D-term inflationary model and does not suffer from the -problem.

(Actually, in many respects compactified on can be considered a sane model compared to KKLMMT and other warped brane inflationary models -  computations of moduli stabilization are so much more under control, SUSY breaking is spontaneous etc. As I understand, this was the main reason for Keshav Dasgupta and Renata Kallosh with collaborators to introduce this model back in 2002.)

has however another problem: cosmic string production in the end of inflation (when D-term flatness is restored and symmetry gets spontaneously broken). Based on results of WMAP5 observations, we do not want too many cosmic strings (just basically one per Hubble volume). The authors spend a lot of time discussing this issue.

The bottom line of their study is that there are either too many cosmic strings (the case of large coupling) or, if there is small amount of them, turns out to be very close to 1.  One can still squeeze model into WMAP5 rigid bounds, but one needs to push really hard for that.

b) Eternal inflation is possible

As you remember, the inflaton field range in D-brane inflationary models is typically not very wide, since it is related to the overall value of CY (and the latter is in turn related to the value of the 4-dimensional Planckian mass ). As a result, it is really hard for D-brane inflation to become eternal (in KKLMMT there is very small interval of field values corresponding to eternal inflation, please see our paper on disorder on the landscape).

As authors show, in inflationary model, due to the stringy corrections potential of the inflaton can acquire a maximum. Near the maximum potential has the form and inflation is eternal.

(Also, as it turns out, the inflaton field range allowed in the model can be significantly larger than if the torus is asymmetrical. )