NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

274. Video of the day: Quark-gluon plasma at RHIC

HEP-TH/PH — By Dmitry Podolsky on February 19, 2009 at 9:46 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

Beautiful promo video of RHIC. Not sure what she means by “they expected to find a gas…” 274. Video of the day: Quark gluon plasma at RHIC

3 Comments

  1. Lubos Motl says:
    February 20, 2009 at 10:15 am

    Hi Dmitry, I think that she makes it perfectly clear what is meant by the gas expectations (although I don’t quite believe that the narrator is the actual author of these statements).

    In gases, all particles propagate independently – which also means in all directions. Only when interactions between the “molecules” become strong enough, one can have liquids or solids with preferred directions and clustering.

    I don’t know exactly why the people expected a gas but I guess it’s roughly because the typical energies were rather high (at least the total ones), and they though that at high energies, quarks are free etc.

    However, a liquid was observed, with some viscosity etc. This behavior is captured well (even quantitatively, to some extent) by AdS/QCD methods.

    Reply
  2. Dmitry says:
    February 20, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    Dear Lubos,

    Although it is true that asymptotic freedom implies that particles get free at high energies, it was rather clear from the beginning that the rigid gas approximation for QG plasma at RHIC will fail, because characteristic gluon occupation numbers after ion collision will be very large.

    Cheers,
    Dmitry.

    Reply
  3. Lubos Motl says:
    February 20, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    Dear Dmitry, maybe it was clear to you, even before you were born, but it was not clear to many people who informed the woman. See e.g. page 3 of

    http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-.....5066v1.pdf

    Start to read the new section 2 at the bottom. It says that everyone since the 1970s until recently, everyone assumed that QGP was a free gas of dressed quarks and gluons, and even when it looked inconsistent with some observations, people were still hoping.

    All the papers that argue otherwise appeared in the 21st century.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.