NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

266. First two weeks of February on NEQNET

Uncategorized — By Dmitry Podolsky on February 16, 2009 at 9:13 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

It seems that I did not do summary of activities on NEQNET for quite a bit 266. First two weeks of February on NEQNET Let me first quickly go through some relevant and irrelevant statistics.

First of all, the number of subscribers to NEQNET has finally crossed the magic number of 200 (two-three days ago). Thank you so much, all of you, who decided to subsribe – you made me extremely happy, made my day! On the other hand – the number of daily visitors is currently more than 1000 and, as I see, at least half of them are not newcomers. If, by a chance, you are reading NEQNET on a constant basis but are not yet subscribed – could I ask you to become a subscriber? It is possible to either subscribe to NEQNET RSS feed or get sent new posts directly to your Inbox.

Second, NEQNET Alexa rank has dropped below 250000 in February (that is, according to Alexa we are in the list of best performing 250000 sites in the world). NEQNET has outperformed “Not even wrong” long time ago (a couple of months ago or so) and will hopefully outperform Lubos Motl’s “The reference frame” in March. Lubos, even if I won’t be able to do that, the process of competition will give me a lot of fun 266. First two weeks of February on NEQNET

So, what was the buzz about at NEQNET during previous two weeks?

1. Turbulence

1.1. Turbulence: Kolmogorov law derived in one line

I explain how to derive Kolmogorov law for developed turbulence from simple dimension analysis.

1.2. Turbulence: brief introduction into phenomenon

I give a brief physical introduction into the subject of developed turbulence and transition to it.

1.3. Physics of turbulence: four puzzles

I shortly discuss four main puzzles that do not allow us to understand the physics of turbulence quantitatively: the order of magnitude of Reynolds number corresponding to transition to turbulence, universality vs. non-universality, importance of viscosity and intermittency. The post gave rise to a bunch of very interesting comments including the one by Prof. Tanveer, where he discusses the issue of turbulent viscosity.

2. String theory, field theory

2.1. Starting dS/CFT: Hilbert space

With this post, I start to discuss the controversial dS/CFT correspondence. In this post, I explain why it should be a rather strange duality – since the dimension of dS Hilbert space is finite.

2.2. Continuing dS/CFT – why it is so hard to prove?

I continue discussion of dS/CFT correspondence turning to the criticisms by Dyson, Susskind and Lindesay.

2.3. Continuing dS/CFT – the correspondence. Part 1.

I identify the main potential problem of dS/CFT correspondence – there is no causal contact between 266. First two weeks of February on NEQNET and physics at the bulk.

2.4. Counting states in the Bousso-Polchinski landscape

The guest blog post by Antonio Segui and Cesar Asenio from the U. of Zaragoza who explain how to properly count low energy states on Bousso-Polchinski landscape.

2.5. Winding effects on brane/antibrane pairs

Another guest blog post by Niko Jokela who explains how to treat brane/antibrane systems on compact spaces.

3. Physic: other

3.1. Top ten open problems in physics

I present a list of top ten unsolved problems in physics: nature of time, turbulence, confinement, string theory, information loss, thermonuclear fusion, high 266. First two weeks of February on NEQNET superconductivity, etc.
Somehow, the post became rather popular 266. First two weeks of February on NEQNET

3.2. Book review: D. Yoshioka, “The quantum Hall effect”

That’s what it is: a brief review of a very nice textbook on fractional and integer quantum Hall effect.

4. Economics, biology, things other than physics

4.1. On credit market debt

I briefly discuss the issue of US credit market debt in its relation to GDP and explain how it lead to the take-off of global financial crisis.

4.2. An efficient local method for community detection in large networks

A guest blog post by Symeon Papadopoulos (Informatics and Telematics Institute, Greece) who teaches us how to identify a closed community within a network.

4.3. Interesting news from PI

Exciting news from the Perimeter Institute – Nima Arkani-Hamed, Subir Sachdev, Yakir Aharonov, Neta Bachall, Juan Igancio Cirac, Gia Dvali, Ashoke Sen, Leonard Susskind, Xiao-Gang Wen are new distinguished research chairs.

4.4. Scientist’s gadgets: Kindle 2 vs. Palm

where I explain how to convert your existing ebooks and pdf files into native Kindle 2 format.

Cheers and thanks so much for coming back! 266. First two weeks of February on NEQNET

6 Comments

  1. Arjen Dijksman says:
    February 16, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    Great idea such a summary.

    My thoughts dwelve from time to time on turbulence. Haven’t made up something sensible yet.

    Does the fact that the Reynolds number is non-dimensional mean that there is a ‘standard’ quantity of about a 100 physical identical subsystems that may stay coherent in a flow? Is it the same for granular flows?

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      February 17, 2009 at 6:29 pm

      Dear Arjen,

      Does the fact that the Reynolds number is non-dimensional mean that there is a ?standard? quantity of about a 100 physical identical subsystems that may stay coherent in a flow?

      You mean, existence of the order of 100 vortices near the transition to turbulence (or did I understand your question correctly – not sure what you meant by “non-dimensional”)? I don’t think so – in Taylor-Quette flow, you can easily have 100 or more circular parallel vortices, but the flow will remain laminar. On the other hand, in that particular example, transition to turbulence of course happens when the overall vorticity of the flow gets large enough.

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply
  2. Lubos Motl says:
    February 16, 2009 at 10:13 pm

    Dear Dmitry, I enjoy competition of the kind that if it wins, I don’t feel disgusted by the world for a while. So good luck.

    However, the Alexa method to measure the impact is amusing, especially in your case, because it shows that 84.2% of the visitors are Finnish:

    http://www.alexa.com/data/deta.....ibrium.net

    Well, that’s not a new phenomenon for me. If you look at Google trends, Finland is the second place to search for Motl, too:

    http://www.google.com/trends?q=motl,+smolin,+woit

    The cities are somewhat more sensible: Princeton, Stanford, Cambridge MA, Prague, Cambridge UK, Helsinki, Boston, Amsterdam…

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      February 17, 2009 at 6:35 pm

      Dear Lubos,

      I enjoy competition of the kind that if it wins, I don’t feel disgusted by the world for a while. So good luck.

      I think I understand. As my adorable Englishmen say, there are things which are sportsman-like and things which are not. I’ll try to be sportsman-like. Also, there is no point in competition if it is of no fun. I really hope you are still finding fun in this stuff. And I also hope I did not disgust you too much so far.

      Regarding Alexa – agree with you completely. Also, the overall ranking is calculated in a strange way – taking into account that your traffic is about 10 times larger than mine at the present time (yours is slightly more than 200000 now and, I guess, it should be much higher based on the level of your traffic).

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply
  3. Lubos Motl says:
    February 17, 2009 at 9:45 pm

    Haha, I just wonder whether all the statistically elevated visits and searches from Finland on all those services is just you or also your family. ;-)

    By the way, you forgot to celebrate one more achievement. If you look at your feedburner logo, it shows 207 readers. You are just five people short of Sheldon’s goal announced at 4:35 of

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoxBuaPmmrc

    Except that in Sheldon’s case, it should be MySpace. Congratulations anyway. ;-)

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      February 17, 2009 at 9:49 pm

      Haha, I just wonder whether all the statistically elevated visits and searches from Finland on all those services is just you or also your family.

      No, don’t worry – I will not trick the game this way, it’s boring.

      And congratulations with your 100th comment!

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.