Book of the week: S. Hawking. A briefer history of time
Powered by MaxBlogPress 

262. Video of the day: so, what is this “Non-equilibrium Phenomena” stuff about?

Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF                                


  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

If you liked the post, please kindly consider to leave a comment, subscribe to the RSS feed or get new posts sent directly to your Inbox. If you want to chat with me in real time, you can find me on Twitter. The posts below are probably related to the subject of this one:

35. Lectures on AdS/CFT by Maldacena
86. Life cycle of stem cells
239. Susskind’s lectures on general relativity
374. How big is the Universe: video of the day
236. Video of the day: Susskind’s lectures on special relativity 5 – 8

RSS feed | Trackback URI

4 Comments »

Comment by Lubos Motl
2009-02-15 22:13:07

That’s interesting. In Russian, you would normally omit “is” from most sentences. In your title, you included it twice and you also replaced “stuff” by “staff” – the latter being a set of employees rather than a material. ;-)

More importantly, isn’t the video a case of equilibrium phenomena rather than non-equilibrium phenomena?

Sorry for being so picky but more than 1/2 of words in your title, which is your contribution here, seem to be flawed. :-)

Comment by Dmitry
2009-02-15 23:45:37

That’s interesting. In Russian, you would normally omit “is” from most sentences. In your title, you included it twice and you also replaced “stuff” by “staff” – the latter being a set of employees rather than a material.

OMG, you are absolutely right, sorry for that and thanks!

More importantly, isn’t the video a case of equilibrium phenomena rather than non-equilibrium phenomena?

Although I did not say that video gives an answer to the question… do you really think that the fork and the spoon still, at this very moment, stay there on that glass? :-) Life and its interaction with forks and spoons is the most interesting non-equilibrium phenomenon in Nature.

Sorry for being so picky but more than 1/2 of words in your title, which is your contribution here, seem to be flawed.

Seems so LOL Today is Sunday, can I loose focus a bit at least on Sundays? :-)

Cheers,
Dmitry.

 
 
Comment by Lubos Motl
2009-02-16 08:58:10

Dear Dmitry, do I think that the fork and spoon still stay on that glass?

Nope, because the person has manually removed them at 2:44 of the video. :-) But I don’t think it proves that it was a non-equilibrium phenomenon.

When the visible hand of the Creator is removed, it was an equilibrium phenomenon.

It could have been an unstable equilibrium but because of the tiny yet sufficient friction and non-uniformities on the surface, it was actually a stable equilibrium.

Also, I thought that the term “non-equilibrium” was reserved for *thermodynamic* time-dependent phenomena, anyway.

Comment by Dmitry
2009-02-17 18:17:54

Dear Lubos,

Nope, because the person has manually removed them at 2:44 of the video.

The action of the person is a genuine non-equilibrium phenomenon as life itself is :-) Take a can, put some bacteria into it (and material for them to feed with), close the can and enjoy non-equilibrium phenomena – for a rather long time, until the population does out.

When the visible hand of the Creator is removed, it was an equilibrium phenomenon.

It could have been an unstable equilibrium but because of the tiny yet sufficient friction and non-uniformities on the surface, it was actually a stable equilibrium.

Let us call it quasi-stable, that is, unstable w.r.t. not so small perturbations :-)

Also, I thought that the term ?non-equilibrium? was reserved for *thermodynamic* time-dependent phenomena, anyway.

Not sure why you want to use the term in so narrow sense, for example, Wald diagrammantic technique used to study turbulence belongs to the class of non-equilibrium diagrammatic techniques.

Cheers,
Dmitry.

 
 
Please, enter your name (required)
e-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
or login via Facebook by clicking the button below
Your comment (smaller size | larger size)
For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

« Back to text comment
or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post