<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 226. Top ten open problems in physics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/</link>
	<description>Cosmology, turbulence, markets, non-equilibrium QFT and much more. No nonsense, just science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:43:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: theorist</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-9308</link>
		<dc:creator>theorist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-9308</guid>
		<description>Truly written by a high energy person. The only condensed matter problem mentioned is high Tc superconductivity because it&#039;s too tantalizing for technological reasons, and turbulence because it is so simple to formulate. Forgotten are: transport near a quantum critical point (some people say AdS-CFT will solve this, so you, string theorists, should pay attention), topological states of nature and fractional/non-Abelian particles (yes, from the point of view of a string theorist, this is about how to make an effective Chern-Simons theory using interacting bosons and fermions, but it&#039;s not as simple as it sounds), disordered magnets down to zero Kelvin (or how to make spins behave like Yang-Mills fields, so you, string theory types, tremble), and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly written by a high energy person. The only condensed matter problem mentioned is high Tc superconductivity because it&#8217;s too tantalizing for technological reasons, and turbulence because it is so simple to formulate. Forgotten are: transport near a quantum critical point (some people say AdS-CFT will solve this, so you, string theorists, should pay attention), topological states of nature and fractional/non-Abelian particles (yes, from the point of view of a string theorist, this is about how to make an effective Chern-Simons theory using interacting bosons and fermions, but it&#8217;s not as simple as it sounds), disordered magnets down to zero Kelvin (or how to make spins behave like Yang-Mills fields, so you, string theory types, tremble), and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasper</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-9285</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-9285</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the Navier-stokes equations are Turing complete..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the Navier-stokes equations are Turing complete..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex G</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-9284</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-9284</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the excellent posting, Dmitry!  I have heard that modeling the accretion disks around super-massive black holes is one of the most difficult problems around, due to the combination of turbulence with relativistic masses and velocities.  Would you care to comment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the excellent posting, Dmitry!  I have heard that modeling the accretion disks around super-massive black holes is one of the most difficult problems around, due to the combination of turbulence with relativistic masses and velocities.  Would you care to comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Ten Open Problems in Physics &#171; Successful Researcher</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-9283</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Ten Open Problems in Physics &#171; Successful Researcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-9283</guid>
		<description>[...] Ten Open Problems in&#160;Physics  A list by Dmitry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ten Open Problems in&nbsp;Physics  A list by Dmitry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Zuniga</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-9275</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Zuniga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-9275</guid>
		<description>Great summary of current 21st Century puzzles.  These are present opportunities for quality time thinking.

Thanks,

Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great summary of current 21st Century puzzles.  These are present opportunities for quality time thinking.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quod Erat Demonstrandum (Q.E.D.): there is NO sales in Science &#124; Secrets of Success In Physics</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-9274</link>
		<dc:creator>Quod Erat Demonstrandum (Q.E.D.): there is NO sales in Science &#124; Secrets of Success In Physics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-9274</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/.....s-physics/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NEQNET: Last two weeks of April &#124; NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-8251</link>
		<dc:creator>NEQNET: Last two weeks of April &#124; NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 19:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-8251</guid>
		<description>[...] Somehow, I decided to study the physics of thermonuclear fusion a bit to get some understanding of the problem that I assigned N7 in my list to&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Somehow, I decided to study the physics of thermonuclear fusion a bit to get some understanding of the problem that I assigned N7 in my list to&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-8217</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 07:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-8217</guid>
		<description>Dear Ignacio,

thanks for the comment and for dropping by. Understanding the nature of life is certainly the major problem, probably comparable to N1 in its complexity. My impression is that it should be also related to the problem N3 (turbulence and chaotic behavior of dynamical systems) in the sense that it is a counterpart of the problem N3 - one has to explain self-organization appearing out of chaos :-)

Cheers,
Dmitry.

P.S. By the way, take a look at http://tglab.princeton.edu/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Ignacio,</p>
<p>thanks for the comment and for dropping by. Understanding the nature of life is certainly the major problem, probably comparable to N1 in its complexity. My impression is that it should be also related to the problem N3 (turbulence and chaotic behavior of dynamical systems) in the sense that it is a counterpart of the problem N3 &#8211; one has to explain self-organization appearing out of chaos <img src='http://www.nonequilibrium.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dmitry.</p>
<p>P.S. By the way, take a look at <a href="http://tglab.princeton.edu/" rel="nofollow">http://tglab.princeton.edu/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignacio</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-8212</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignacio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 05:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-8212</guid>
		<description>Dear Dmitry,

First of all, I found your post very interesting, although I am not a phisicyst. However I would like to propose another problem for the list, which I think is a major one.

Although it may not be strictly in the field of phisycs, the problem is life. How inanimate matter operates combines inside a cell in order to become living matter.

I would like to hear your opinion about this problem. I&#039;m sorry if this is out of place.

Regards,
Ignacio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dmitry,</p>
<p>First of all, I found your post very interesting, although I am not a phisicyst. However I would like to propose another problem for the list, which I think is a major one.</p>
<p>Although it may not be strictly in the field of phisycs, the problem is life. How inanimate matter operates combines inside a cell in order to become living matter.</p>
<p>I would like to hear your opinion about this problem. I&#8217;m sorry if this is out of place.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Ignacio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thermonuclear fusion: some basic facts about thermonuclear reactions &#124; NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-7841</link>
		<dc:creator>Thermonuclear fusion: some basic facts about thermonuclear reactions &#124; NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-7841</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote Ten open problems in physics, the ultimate plan behind the post was that I first list those problems and then discuss every [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote Ten open problems in physics, the ultimate plan behind the post was that I first list those problems and then discuss every [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nishant</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-6912</link>
		<dc:creator>Nishant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-6912</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, that is indeed strange considering that the mathematicians and physicists working in NCG, string theory etc. (like Connes, Yoccoz et al) are yet skeptical about the status of string theory vis-a-vis LQG. [To be fair I myself am a proponent of String Theory, but it always is safer to discard prominent &#039;loopholes&#039; in a theory before we regard it as the benchmark!] This situation is analogous to the debate of Big Bang vs Steady State where they pretty much nullified the Steady State theory and I would like such conclusive evidence to tilt the balance beyond a shadow of doubt. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, that is indeed strange considering that the mathematicians and physicists working in NCG, string theory etc. (like Connes, Yoccoz et al) are yet skeptical about the status of string theory vis-a-vis LQG. [To be fair I myself am a proponent of String Theory, but it always is safer to discard prominent 'loopholes' in a theory before we regard it as the benchmark!] This situation is analogous to the debate of Big Bang vs Steady State where they pretty much nullified the Steady State theory and I would like such conclusive evidence to tilt the balance beyond a shadow of doubt. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-6910</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-6910</guid>
		<description>Dear Nishant,

I think, yes, many people have pretty much concluded :-)

Cheers,
Dmitry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Nishant,</p>
<p>I think, yes, many people have pretty much concluded <img src='http://www.nonequilibrium.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dmitry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nishant</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-6421</link>
		<dc:creator>Nishant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-6421</guid>
		<description>Have we yet concluded as to which one is more likely - String Theory or the Loop Quantum gravity? If not, why is that not one of the problems included herein ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have we yet concluded as to which one is more likely &#8211; String Theory or the Loop Quantum gravity? If not, why is that not one of the problems included herein ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An interesting, Russian point of view on importance of turbulence problem &#171; Alex&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-6065</link>
		<dc:creator>An interesting, Russian point of view on importance of turbulence problem &#171; Alex&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-6065</guid>
		<description>[...] leave a comment &#187;  226. Top ten open problems in physics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] leave a comment &raquo;  226. Top ten open problems in physics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 253. Video of the day: first time machine</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/comment-page-1/#comment-5995</link>
		<dc:creator>253. Video of the day: first time machine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=1350#comment-5995</guid>
		<description>[...] Channel program (for children really - but featuring Ronald Mallett from the U. of Connecticut) related to the problem N1 in my list. NEQNET would like to state officially that time travel is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Channel program (for children really &#8211; but featuring Ronald Mallett from the U. of Connecticut) related to the problem N1 in my list. NEQNET would like to state officially that time travel is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
