NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

218. Implemented Facebook Connect!

Uncategorized — By Dmitry Podolsky on January 31, 2009 at 9:03 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

Maybe, some weeks ago some of you have noticed a frame in the sidebar of NEQNET that looked like

218. Implemented Facebook Connect!

The frame then suddenly disappeared again 218. Implemented Facebook Connect! It actually contained the implementation of Facebook Connect on NEQNET, and the buggy piece of junk did not want to work as it supposed to.

It took about three weeks of my time before I finally figured out how to make it work, and as it turns out, Facebook Connect is not as useless as it seems at first sight 218. Implemented Facebook Connect! Actually, I am a kind of proud – even ScienceBlogs and many other large blog portals or popular blogs were yet unable to implement this technology.


1. Facebook Connect – what is it and what is it for?

This is a fresh (a couple of months old) technology developed by the Facebook team in order to allow you to login to different sites and blogs using your Facebook account as well as to seamlessly integrate Facebook with these sites, that is, to support multiple Facebook features on these sites.

For example, let us consider NEQNET. If you want to leave a comment on NEQNET, you can now login to the site pressing the 218. Implemented Facebook Connect! button instead of putting your name and email in the comment form. The technology is actually very convenient: instead of creating many different profiles on multiple websites, you can use your single FB profile where it is supported.


2. How exactly does it work on NEQNET?

The following video will explain you how to login to the site using Facebook Connect, how to edit your profile, take a look at profiles of other members of the site’s community and invite friends to the site through the Facebook. Sorry that the video is really for Sociable, I am yet to learn how to do my own videos, but I am in the process of learning currently 218. Implemented Facebook Connect!

3. How can one implement it on a WordPress blog?

There are two parts – simple and complicated 218. Implemented Facebook Connect! The simple part is to download Facebook Connect plugin for WordPress and follow this simple video tutorial:

The complicated part is related to the absence of documentation that is supposed to come with the plugin. If something in the tutorial above does not work at all or does not work as it is supposed to, you get stuck. In particular, in some cases (there are several similar complaints in comments to Sociable.es), after logging in with Facebook Connect you may enjoy watching the blank screen instead of getting back to the site. You’ll enjoy watching it every time coming back to the site until you clean the cache and cookies of the browser.

As I have found out, one reason why you may see the blank screen is that your host does not support curl and simplexml php extensions, that Facebook Connect really requires to work properly. Once you install them and/or turn on their support on the host, everything starts to work smoothly.

4. What about Google Friends Connect? I am not ready yet

Not so long time ago, Google has also released somewhat similar technology called Google Friends Connect. Although it is much simpler to implement on any site (not just a blog), the functionality that Google Friends Connect offers on a WordPress blog so far really sucks. Basically, the only thing people can do right now is to join the community of the site – one cannot post comments on a WordPress using her Google Friends Connect identity.

The situation will probably change in the near future, if somebody decides to write a really nice plugin for the WordPress supporting the crossposting of comments between the Google Friends Connect wall and WordPress blog posts. Another reason why you might be potentially interested in implementing Google Friends Connect on your site (if you are a webmaster) is that it also supports gadgets from the Open Social Directory (though, there are not so many interesting or useful gadgets right now).

5 Comments

  1. Lubos Motl says:
    January 31, 2009 at 10:51 pm

    Privet, Dmitry, certain things are too high-tech for me, an old-fashioned guy grown by Web 1.0, Web 0.0, and Web -1.0. I am simply not getting anything about these “social” services.

    Like twitter. Are the twitter updates on NEQNET supposed to be read by humans or robots? ;-) With all my respect, they look like some computer-generated abstracts from random SMS text messages on cell phones.

    Are you writing them yourself, or partly yourself, or are others sending you these messages, and do you have to write the blog post by hand or does it spam your blog automatically? :-)

    As you can see, I have no clue! Twitter seems as the most diluted form of internetism that is reducing the depth of everything written anywhere to an infinitesimal number – and I thought that such things are only designed for rings of good friends who only do sex & alcohol & drugs instead of physics thoughts.

    Or do I misunderstand everything? :-)

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      February 1, 2009 at 9:36 pm

      Dear Mighty Czechmeister of all Russians,

      Are the twitter updates on NEQNET supposed to be read by humans or robots?

      Both, my Lord, and they actually do their job pretty well. But above all, I participate in rather large number of discussions on twitter, so I wanted to acknowledge people who take part in these discussions.

      With all my respect, they look like some computer-generated abstracts from random SMS text messages on cell phones.

      It is of no surprise since a message on Twitter is supposed to be maximally 140 characters long. As far as I understand, this is made exactly in order to allow easy twitting using mobile phones.

      Are you writing them yourself, or partly yourself,

      Myself, o Mighty One.

      and do you have to write the blog post by hand or does it spam your blog automatically?

      It spams my blog automatically pulling messages from my Twitter account, o Darth Motl. I do edit them afterwards, though.

      I thought that such things are only designed for rings of good friends who only do sex & alcohol & drugs instead of physics thoughts.

      Somewhat true, however, I’ve got about 400 followers in two weeks just discussing physics and putting links on physics related staff, my Lord. They are good people, some of them even want to learn some physics.

      Recently, I was asked to explain E_8 and GUTs in less than 140 characters. This was fun and quite a challenge.

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply
  2. Lubos Motl says:
    February 2, 2009 at 9:53 am

    Dear comrade Dmitry,

    thanks a lot for your explanations. Otherwise, your verbal servility may sound excessive but it can’t hurt to live through 45 years in which the role of the two nations will be slightly reverted, can it? ;-)

    E8 and GUT in 140 chars is easy peasy. You can borrow it from my Xmas carol “Single Vevs”.

    Landscape now is gone,
    so let’s have some fun
    Take Witten along
    And sing predictive song.
    Starting from the state
    Two-forty-eight E-eight,
    Numbers you can calculate
    and crack! You won’t be late.

    Single set of single vevs, single all the way!
    …

    At any rate, I am sure that the communication in 140-byte packets must be very helpful for the level of depth and detail in your thoughts. ;-)

    Best wishes
    Lubo?

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      February 2, 2009 at 12:03 pm

      Dear Lubos,

      Otherwise, your verbal servility may sound excessive but it can’t hurt to live through 45 years in which the role of the two nations will be slightly reverted, can it?

      I hope you liked it and it eased your pain a bit. To conclude, I am afraid I cannot carry personal responsibility for Prague 1968.

      At any rate, I am sure that the communication in 140-byte packets must be very helpful for the level of depth and detail in your thoughts.

      Sometimes it is good to stay focused ;-)

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply
  3. Arturo Paracuellos says:
    February 26, 2009 at 10:22 am

    I prefer FB Connect to Google Friends Conenct.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.