Recent posts: D. Cubero. Thermal equilibrium in special relativity
Powered by MaxBlogPress 

207. Edward Farhi explains at Google why physicists need LHC

Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF                                


It’s great that Googlers are interested to hear talks by science experts, maybe it will help them to understand what is actually related to science and what is not :-) Because right now the ads that AdSense serves to science related sites and blogs are terrible – to the degree they can be hardly called contextual advertising :-) Check out for example Lubos’ blog – he has all kinds of funny ads like “Physicsofthemind.net” and “Guru Krishna Brahaburatiobha is your true teacher” etc. etc. LOL

  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

If you liked the post, please kindly consider to leave a comment, subscribe to the RSS feed or get new posts sent directly to your Inbox. If you want to chat with me in real time, you can find me on Twitter. The posts below are probably related to the subject of this one:

268. Video of the day: Sean Carroll at Google
Google Wave
190. Ex-googlers share their impressions about the company. Hilarious!
35. Lectures on AdS/CFT by Maldacena
89. First week of November on NEQNET

RSS feed | Trackback URI

5 Comments »

Comment by Lubos Motl
2009-01-29 12:52:27

Isn’t Krishna your teacher as well? How do you care about your physics of mind in that case?

There should exist serious sources that try to get the attention of physics fans etc. For example, I would prefer a lot of advertisements from CERN or NASA. But that’s not how the world works. ;-)

This nonsense gets to the people, anyway, and I quickly decided that it would be foolish to censor it. It’s fun, after all.

Farhi is a very interesting guy.

Comment by Dmitry
2009-01-30 15:25:17

Isn’t Krishna your teacher as well?

Of course, Krishna is my teacher, it is just me who is terrible student :-)

So, you are saying that they simply don’t have science related ads to serve? I seriously doubt it, look at banner ads here and there, there are lots of science related staff flashing, so science is on the market. I actually think that their algorithm to determine relevance is simply not good enough to work with scientific content.

More accurately, PR based on the number of incoming links is not good enough for science yet. Look how Google Search serves PDFs of articles – not many of them are actually even relevant (Google Scholar is better, but not terribly better).

Cheers,
Dmitry.

 
 
Comment by Lubos Motl
2009-01-30 21:17:14

You may be right but it is questionable whether the kind of science ads that do exist elsewhere would be relevant for the more typical readers of your or my blog.

Comment by Dmitry
2009-01-31 21:29:36

Interestingly, NEQNET is now on the first page of Google Search Results for “Horror moview brain removal” ;-)

Cheers,
Dmitry.

 
 
Please, enter your name (required)
e-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
or login via Facebook by clicking the button below
Your comment (smaller size | larger size)
For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

« Back to text comment
or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post