NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

207. Edward Farhi explains at Google why physicists need LHC

Uncategorized — By Dmitry Podolsky on January 27, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

It’s great that Googlers are interested to hear talks by science experts, maybe it will help them to understand what is actually related to science and what is not 207. Edward Farhi explains at Google why physicists need LHC Because right now the ads that AdSense serves to science related sites and blogs are terrible – to the degree they can be hardly called contextual advertising 207. Edward Farhi explains at Google why physicists need LHC Check out for example Lubos’ blog – he has all kinds of funny ads like “Physicsofthemind.net” and “Guru Krishna Brahaburatiobha is your true teacher” etc. etc. LOL

5 Comments

  1. Lubos Motl says:
    January 29, 2009 at 12:52 pm

    Isn’t Krishna your teacher as well? How do you care about your physics of mind in that case?

    There should exist serious sources that try to get the attention of physics fans etc. For example, I would prefer a lot of advertisements from CERN or NASA. But that’s not how the world works. ;-)

    This nonsense gets to the people, anyway, and I quickly decided that it would be foolish to censor it. It’s fun, after all.

    Farhi is a very interesting guy.

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      January 30, 2009 at 3:25 pm

      Isn’t Krishna your teacher as well?

      Of course, Krishna is my teacher, it is just me who is terrible student :-)

      So, you are saying that they simply don’t have science related ads to serve? I seriously doubt it, look at banner ads here and there, there are lots of science related staff flashing, so science is on the market. I actually think that their algorithm to determine relevance is simply not good enough to work with scientific content.

      More accurately, PR based on the number of incoming links is not good enough for science yet. Look how Google Search serves PDFs of articles – not many of them are actually even relevant (Google Scholar is better, but not terribly better).

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply
  2. Lubos Motl says:
    January 30, 2009 at 9:17 pm

    You may be right but it is questionable whether the kind of science ads that do exist elsewhere would be relevant for the more typical readers of your or my blog.

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      January 31, 2009 at 9:29 pm

      Interestingly, NEQNET is now on the first page of Google Search Results for “Horror moview brain removal” ;-)

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

  • 268. Video of the day: Sean Carroll at Google

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.