NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

191. Integer quantum Hall effect – theory

COND-MAT — By Dmitry Podolsky on January 20, 2009 at 7:15 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

I guess, my reader, you are either a) an undergrad, b) a graduate student, c) a postdoc (or even professor? 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory Cheers, Joe) or d) you are just interested in science and theoretical physics in particular (maybe, you even had a couple of courses related to physics in college). If b) or c) holds, you will probably fail to find anything interesting in this post, but if I am lucky, then a) or d) holds 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory

The reason, as I said before, is that studies of quantum Hall effect remain a very hot subject in condensed matter theory after almost 20 years. In a sense, the subject provides a kind of theoretical laboratory, where new non-trivial theoretical ideas constantly appear, get estimated and finally get dismissed to reappear in condensed matter theory in some other context 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory

Since you already have a first impression what physics of the quantum Hall effect is about, it is time to discuss theories that might have something to do with this physics. I’ll start with integer quantum Hall effect which is fairly understood and discuss the fractional quantum Hall effect tomorrow.

But before proceeding to further discussion, let me ask you to solve the following

Exercise 1. Consider a classical Hall effect as discussed in my previous post on the subject – that is, two-dimensional metallic plate, the electric current 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory flows along x-direction, magnetic field 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory is applied along z-axis. As you remember, magnetic field curves the trajectories of carriers: trajectories of positive and negative charges are getting curved in opposite directions. As a result, positive and negative charges accumulate on the opposite faces of the material along y-axis, and effective electric field 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory is created. Try to calculate the Hall resistivity 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory defined as

191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory.

This is a rather simple problem – all you need in order to solve it is to recall the basics of electromagnetism. This will also give you some intuition regarding the quantum Hall effect, too.

But let me actually turn to the integer quantum Hall effect. It is possible to explain it using free electron gas model, more accurately – 2 dimensional free electron gas model, since we are essentially dealing with quasi-two dimensional sample – carriers can move freely only in the plane of the sample.

Without magnetic field the spectrum of carriers is continuous. If a magnetic field 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory is applied perpendicular to the plane of the sample, the electron spectrum becomes discrete – it consists of equidistant Landau levels:

191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory, (1)

where 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory is cyclotron frequency and 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory is (effective) electron mass.

The magnetic flux is also quantized – in units

191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory, (2)

and the density of states for every Landau level is given by the density of quanta of magnetic flux:

191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory. (3)

The density of states has the dimension 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory, and there is some area corresponding to every state on every Landau level.

Exercise 2. Calculate this area.

What we always have to recall is that we deal with electron gas at very low temperatures (that’s the regime where the quantum Hall effect is observed) – this means that only electron states with energies below the Fermi energy are occupied.

Imagine now that we change the magnetic field 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory. The position of Landau levels changes (see the formula (1) above), so does its relative position w.r.t. the Fermi energy 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory. If 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory is between neighbouring Landau levels 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory and 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory, all low laying states with 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory, 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory are occupied.

Therefore, one can estimate the overall density of carriers in the sample as

191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory. (4)

If you substitute (4) into the expression for 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory in classical Hall effect, you'll find that the Hall resistivity is equal to

191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory, (5)

where 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory, the formula you saw in my previous post on the subject.

What do we learn from (5)? First of all, we only needed the basics of quantum mechanics – Landau quantization in magnetic field and Fermi-Dirac statistics to derive it. The first lesson from my point of view is that it is always good to look for simpler explanations – although it seems to be the whole particle zoo in the picture below,

191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory

the physics behind it is just one of a harmonic oscillator.

The second lesson is that it is relatively clear from these considerations how to shut the effect down. For example, we can increase temperature 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory, and the energy levels will get also filled above 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory. Another way to affect our considerations is to increase the interaction between carriers. As a result, Landau levels will acquire some width, and discreteness in 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory will be killed, if this width becomes comparable to the distance between adjacent Landau levels.

I’ll consider the fractional Hall effect that turns out to be way more complicated tomorrow, but in the mean time please feel free to drop your thoughts on integer quantum Hall effect in comments 191. Integer quantum Hall effect   theory

7 Comments

  1. tg says:
    January 21, 2009 at 4:14 am

    I am confused about your comment about longitudinal resistance in the previous post. You seemed to say that it is vanishingly small at zero temperatures. But from the picture you posted it seemed that the longitudinal resistance vanishes only at the special values of H which correspond to plateaus?

    Also, how does one go about explaining the behavior of longitudinal transport within the simple picture you presented?

    Thanks for both of your posts!

    Reply
  2. Keith C says:
    January 21, 2009 at 7:59 am

    Hi Dmitry
    That’s interesting.
    But I have a question. In the derivation, only the states in the Landau level with energy less than the Fermi energy contribute to the carrier. But I think all the electrons have some Landau level quantum number, so they should occupy some Landau level. Classically, all the electrons rotate in the magnetic field. So I don’t quite understand why only some electrons occupy the Landau level.
    Keith

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      January 21, 2009 at 4:01 pm

      Dear Keith,

      This is actually basic quantum mechanics staff – namely, Fermi-Dirac distribution. At temperature T occupation numbers of states with energy E_k behave as

      n_k=\frac{1}{\exp\left(\frac{E_k-\mu}{T}\right)+1},

      where \mu is chemical potential.

      There are simply no electrons in the system with energy below E_F, if the temperature is zero. Does this answer your question?

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply
  3. Dmitry says:
    January 21, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    Dear tg,

    anyon.mit.edu – that domain name is talking :-) \rho_{xy} is not longitudinal (that is, diagonal) resistivity, this is Hall resistivity. On the other hand, longitudinal resistivity \rho_{xx} indeed vanishes at T\to{}0. However, at finite temperature (that is, where we measure it in experiment – say 1.5 K) it is not quite zero, albeit very small compared to its value in the absence of magnetic field H=0. Moreover, it exhibits oscillatory behavior somewhat resembling the one of \rho_{xy} – it has peaks at the same values of H.
    I hope it was clear enough – if not, please ask further questions.

    Regarding the explanation of the fact that \rho_{xx}\to{}0 – it is slightly (or not so slightly :-) ) more complicated, and I’ll probably write another post about it.

    Cheers,
    Dmitry.

    Reply
  4. tg says:
    January 22, 2009 at 2:19 am

    Sorry if my remark was confusing…I understand that \rho_{xy} is transverse and \rho_{xx} longitudinal and that the plateaus in the figure refer to the former while spikes correspond to the latter. I was actually referring to the last paragraph of your psot no. 188 on IQHE (about \rho_{xx}) and I think I worded it a bit wrongly. I meant to say that \rho_{xx} vanishes for special intervals of H (rather than at special values of H) viz those lying between the beginning and end of a plateau.

    As for the domain name, it wasn’t really chosen by me but I like it :-)

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      January 22, 2009 at 1:19 pm

      Dear tg,

      Yep, \rho_{xy} has plateaus and \rho_{xx} – spikes. The values of \rho_{xx} in spikes are still small compared to \rho_{xx} at H\to{}0 – that’s what I really meant saying that it is vanishing.

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

  • 195. Integer quantum Hall effect - plateaus in Hall resistivity

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.