191. Integer quantum Hall effect – theory
COND-MAT — By Dmitry Podolsky on January 20, 2009 at 7:15 pmI guess, my reader, you are either a) an undergrad, b) a graduate student, c) a postdoc (or even professor?
Cheers, Joe) or d) you are just interested in science and theoretical physics in particular (maybe, you even had a couple of courses related to physics in college). If b) or c) holds, you will probably fail to find anything interesting in this post, but if I am lucky, then a) or d) holds
The reason, as I said before, is that studies of quantum Hall effect remain a very hot subject in condensed matter theory after almost 20 years. In a sense, the subject provides a kind of theoretical laboratory, where new non-trivial theoretical ideas constantly appear, get estimated and finally get dismissed to reappear in condensed matter theory in some other context
Since you already have a first impression what physics of the quantum Hall effect is about, it is time to discuss theories that might have something to do with this physics. I’ll start with integer quantum Hall effect which is fairly understood and discuss the fractional quantum Hall effect tomorrow.
But before proceeding to further discussion, let me ask you to solve the following
Exercise 1. Consider a classical Hall effect as discussed in my previous post on the subject – that is, two-dimensional metallic plate, the electric current
flows along x-direction, magnetic field
is applied along z-axis. As you remember, magnetic field curves the trajectories of carriers: trajectories of positive and negative charges are getting curved in opposite directions. As a result, positive and negative charges accumulate on the opposite faces of the material along y-axis, and effective electric field
is created. Try to calculate the Hall resistivity
defined as
.
This is a rather simple problem – all you need in order to solve it is to recall the basics of electromagnetism. This will also give you some intuition regarding the quantum Hall effect, too.
But let me actually turn to the integer quantum Hall effect. It is possible to explain it using free electron gas model, more accurately – 2 dimensional free electron gas model, since we are essentially dealing with quasi-two dimensional sample – carriers can move freely only in the plane of the sample.
Without magnetic field the spectrum of carriers is continuous. If a magnetic field
is applied perpendicular to the plane of the sample, the electron spectrum becomes discrete – it consists of equidistant Landau levels:
, (1)
where
is cyclotron frequency and
is (effective) electron mass.
The magnetic flux is also quantized – in units
, (2)
and the density of states for every Landau level is given by the density of quanta of magnetic flux:
. (3)
The density of states has the dimension
, and there is some area corresponding to every state on every Landau level.
Exercise 2. Calculate this area.
What we always have to recall is that we deal with electron gas at very low temperatures (that’s the regime where the quantum Hall effect is observed) – this means that only electron states with energies below the Fermi energy are occupied.
Imagine now that we change the magnetic field
. The position of Landau levels changes (see the formula (1) above), so does its relative position w.r.t. the Fermi energy
. If
is between neighbouring Landau levels
and
, all low laying states with
,
are occupied.
Therefore, one can estimate the overall density of carriers in the sample as
. (4)
If you substitute (4) into the expression for
in classical Hall effect, you'll find that the Hall resistivity is equal to
, (5)
where
, the formula you saw in my previous post on the subject.
What do we learn from (5)? First of all, we only needed the basics of quantum mechanics – Landau quantization in magnetic field and Fermi-Dirac statistics to derive it. The first lesson from my point of view is that it is always good to look for simpler explanations – although it seems to be the whole particle zoo in the picture below,

the physics behind it is just one of a harmonic oscillator.
The second lesson is that it is relatively clear from these considerations how to shut the effect down. For example, we can increase temperature
, and the energy levels will get also filled above
. Another way to affect our considerations is to increase the interaction between carriers. As a result, Landau levels will acquire some width, and discreteness in
will be killed, if this width becomes comparable to the distance between adjacent Landau levels.
I’ll consider the fractional Hall effect that turns out to be way more complicated tomorrow, but in the mean time please feel free to drop your thoughts on integer quantum Hall effect in comments

Save This Post as PDF
7 Comments
I am confused about your comment about longitudinal resistance in the previous post. You seemed to say that it is vanishingly small at zero temperatures. But from the picture you posted it seemed that the longitudinal resistance vanishes only at the special values of H which correspond to plateaus?
Also, how does one go about explaining the behavior of longitudinal transport within the simple picture you presented?
Thanks for both of your posts!
Hi Dmitry
That’s interesting.
But I have a question. In the derivation, only the states in the Landau level with energy less than the Fermi energy contribute to the carrier. But I think all the electrons have some Landau level quantum number, so they should occupy some Landau level. Classically, all the electrons rotate in the magnetic field. So I don’t quite understand why only some electrons occupy the Landau level.
Keith
Dear Keith,
This is actually basic quantum mechanics staff – namely, Fermi-Dirac distribution. At temperature
occupation numbers of states with energy
behave as
where
is chemical potential.
There are simply no electrons in the system with energy below
, if the temperature is zero. Does this answer your question?
Cheers,
Dmitry.
Dear tg,
anyon.mit.edu – that domain name is talking
is not longitudinal (that is, diagonal) resistivity, this is Hall resistivity. On the other hand, longitudinal resistivity
indeed vanishes at
. However, at finite temperature (that is, where we measure it in experiment – say 1.5 K) it is not quite zero, albeit very small compared to its value in the absence of magnetic field
. Moreover, it exhibits oscillatory behavior somewhat resembling the one of
– it has peaks at the same values of
.
I hope it was clear enough – if not, please ask further questions.
Regarding the explanation of the fact that
– it is slightly (or not so slightly
) more complicated, and I’ll probably write another post about it.
Cheers,
Dmitry.
Sorry if my remark was confusing…I understand that \rho_{xy} is transverse and \rho_{xx} longitudinal and that the plateaus in the figure refer to the former while spikes correspond to the latter. I was actually referring to the last paragraph of your psot no. 188 on IQHE (about \rho_{xx}) and I think I worded it a bit wrongly. I meant to say that \rho_{xx} vanishes for special intervals of H (rather than at special values of H) viz those lying between the beginning and end of a plateau.
As for the domain name, it wasn’t really chosen by me but I like it
Dear tg,
Yep,
has plateaus and
– spikes. The values of
in spikes are still small compared to
at
– that’s what I really meant saying that it is vanishing.
Cheers,
Dmitry.
Trackback responses to this post