NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect – what is it?

COND-MAT — By Dmitry Podolsky on January 19, 2009 at 1:23 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

Fractional quantum Hall effect was and remains one of the biggest mysteries in condensed matter theory. To be as arrogant as usual, I will claim that theorist’s brain work necessary to explain fractional quantum Hall effect is roughly equal to the work necessary to explain confinement in QCD, although the former problem is much younger than the latter – the fractional Hall effect was first observed in 1982 by Tsui, Stormer and Gossard.


1. What is classical Hall effect?

Let us first recall what is the classical Hall effect. Suppose that an electric current through the material. If you apply a magnetic field perpendicular to the face of the material, the charge carriers get affected by the Lorentz force that curves their path. As a result, negatively and positively charged carriers accumulate on the opposite faces of material and create strong electric field that prevents further flow of the current. Quantitatively, you can describe the effect as appearance of effective resistivity for the electric current in the material.

188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it?

2. What is quantum Hall effect?

Suppose that the magnetic field is directed along z-axis, electric current – along x-axis and electric field due to the Hall effect appears along y-axis. Basically, quantum Hall effect shows up as a fact that the Hall resistivity 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it? is quantized while 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it? vanishes.

In classical Hall effect, 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it? depends monotonically on 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it? and concentration of carriers 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it?:

188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it?

In quantum Hall effect, 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it? is quantized according to the rule

188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it?,

where 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it? are integer or fractional numbers – that’s where the names “integer” and “fractional quantum Hall effect” come from.

The integer quantum Hall effect was discovered on Si metal-insulator-semiconductor devices in 1980 by the group of K. von Klitzing et al., while fractional one – a bit later, in 1982, when the states with 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it? heterostructures (later, also 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it? state was observed). Generally, heterostructures based on InP, GaSb, GaEs etc. are the main materials where the quantum Hall effect is studied nowadays on.

On practice, that’s what you basically measure and see:

188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it?

As for the 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it? component, in both fractional and integer Hall effects it becomes vanishingly small at non-zero 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it? compared to its value at 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it?. When you increase the temperature 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it?, 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it? starts to grow.

That’s all for now, I hope that it was sufficiently clear – if not, please ask questions. We will discuss the theory of integer quantum Hall effect and some ideas that might help to understand the fractional Hall effect tomorrow 188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect   what is it?

6 Comments

  1. Keith C says:
    January 19, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    Hi Dmitry
    Thanks for your post.
    Since when we apply the electric field in the x-direction, we want the current in x-direction, and vanishing of rho_{xx} means that it is superconducting in the x-direction. So we can conductor current with loss when the conductor exhibits quantum hall effect, right?
    From the plot, to come up with a theory to explain it seems to me is as difficult as to explain the particle zoo. I guess the theory must be somehow related the BCS theory, right?

    Keith

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      January 19, 2009 at 11:26 pm

      Hi Keith,

      I would not call a material superconducting in the x-direction and not – in y-direction, especially taking into account that diagonal resistivity is an oscillating function of magnetic field (albeit its values are small compared to diagonal resistivity at H=0).

      As for the particle zoo, let me turn to it in the tomorrow’s post ;-)

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

  • 191. Integer quantum Hall effect - theory
  • 198. Fractional quantum Hall effect - a few words about theory
  • 228. Book review: D. Yoshioka. The quantum Hall effect
  • Fractional quantum Hall effect in some multicomponent systems | NEQNET: Non-equilibrium Phenomena

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.