Recent posts: R. Biswas. Cosmological parameters in the context of time varying w
Powered by MaxBlogPress 

188. Integer and fractional quantum Hall effect – what is it?

Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF                                


Fractional quantum Hall effect was and remains one of the biggest mysteries in condensed matter theory. To be as arrogant as usual, I will claim that theorist’s brain work necessary to explain fractional quantum Hall effect is roughly equal to the work necessary to explain confinement in QCD, although the former problem is much younger than the latter – the fractional Hall effect was first observed in 1982 by Tsui, Stormer and Gossard.


1. What is classical Hall effect?

Let us first recall what is the classical Hall effect. Suppose that an electric current through the material. If you apply a magnetic field perpendicular to the face of the material, the charge carriers get affected by the Lorentz force that curves their path. As a result, negatively and positively charged carriers accumulate on the opposite faces of material and create strong electric field that prevents further flow of the current. Quantitatively, you can describe the effect as appearance of effective resistivity for the electric current in the material.

Hall effect

2. What is quantum Hall effect?

Suppose that the magnetic field is directed along z-axis, electric current – along x-axis and electric field due to the Hall effect appears along y-axis. Basically, quantum Hall effect shows up as a fact that the Hall resistivity \rho_{xy} is quantized while \rho_{xx} vanishes.

In classical Hall effect, \rho_{xy} depends monotonically on H and concentration of carriers n:

\rho_{xy}=\frac{H}{ne}

In quantum Hall effect, \rho_{xy} is quantized according to the rule

\rho_{xy}=\frac{2\pi\hbar}{\nu{}e^2},

where \nu are integer or fractional numbers – that’s where the names “integer” and “fractional quantum Hall effect” come from.

The integer quantum Hall effect was discovered on Si metal-insulator-semiconductor devices in 1980 by the group of K. von Klitzing et al., while fractional one – a bit later, in 1982, when the states with \nu= 1/3, 2/3, 4/3, 5/3, 7/3, 8/3, 1/5, 2/5, 3/5, 4/5, 6/5, 2/7 were observed on Al_x{}Ga_{1-x}As-GaAs heterostructures (later, also \nu=5/2 state was observed). Generally, heterostructures based on InP, GaSb, GaEs etc. are the main materials where the quantum Hall effect is studied nowadays on.

On practice, that’s what you basically measure and see:

Fractional Hall effect

As for the \rho_{xx} component, in both fractional and integer Hall effects it becomes vanishingly small at non-zero H compared to its value at H\to{}0. When you increase the temperature T, \rho_{xx} starts to grow.

That’s all for now, I hope that it was sufficiently clear – if not, please ask questions. We will discuss the theory of integer quantum Hall effect and some ideas that might help to understand the fractional Hall effect tomorrow ;-)

  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

If you liked the post, please kindly consider to leave a comment, subscribe to the RSS feed or get new posts sent directly to your Inbox. If you want to chat with me in real time, you can find me on Twitter. The posts below are probably related to the subject of this one:

228. Book review: D. Yoshioka. The quantum Hall effect
198. Fractional quantum Hall effect – a few words about theory
191. Integer quantum Hall effect – theory
203. Quantum Hall effect. One open question
195. Integer quantum Hall effect – plateaus in Hall resistivity

RSS feed | Trackback URI

6 Comments »

Comment by Keith C
2009-01-19 21:18:05

Hi Dmitry
Thanks for your post.
Since when we apply the electric field in the x-direction, we want the current in x-direction, and vanishing of rho_{xx} means that it is superconducting in the x-direction. So we can conductor current with loss when the conductor exhibits quantum hall effect, right?
From the plot, to come up with a theory to explain it seems to me is as difficult as to explain the particle zoo. I guess the theory must be somehow related the BCS theory, right?

Keith

Comment by Dmitry
2009-01-19 23:26:59

Hi Keith,

I would not call a material superconducting in the x-direction and not – in y-direction, especially taking into account that diagonal resistivity is an oscillating function of magnetic field (albeit its values are small compared to diagonal resistivity at H=0).

As for the particle zoo, let me turn to it in the tomorrow’s post ;-)

Cheers,
Dmitry.

 
 
Please, enter your name (required)
e-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
or login via Facebook by clicking the button below
Your comment (smaller size | larger size)
For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

« Back to text comment
or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post