NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

183. Constraining photon-hidden photon oscillations via CMB

ASTRO, HEP-TH/PH — By Alessandro Mirizzi on January 16, 2009 at 6:57 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

This is a guest blog post by Alessandro Mirizzi, Research Fellow at Max Planck Institute of Physics, Munich. Dmitry.

Recently, Javier Redondo, Guenter Sigl and I have completed a study on the possibility to constrain photon-hidden photon oscillations using the extremely precise measurements of the cosmic microwave backgroung (CMB). Here I discuss our results, presented in arXiv:0901.0014.

A hidden photon is the gauge boson of a gauge 183. Constraining photon hidden photon oscillations via CMB hidden symmetry under which all the SM fields are uncharged, and thus remains hidden in our world. At energies above the electroweak scale, particles charged under the hidden 183. Constraining photon hidden photon oscillations via CMB and the SM hypercharge are likely to exist and act as messengers between the two “sectors” of low-energy physics. Their effects will produce effective operators in the low-energy theory that contains the SM and the hidden photon. Typically, these operators are irrelevant, suppressed by the heavy particle masses. But there is still one marginal operator, the so called kinetic mixing whose effects are not in principle suppressed by heavy masses and thus can lead to relatively large effects. This mixing leads to oscillations between photons and hidden photons, analogous to the observed oscillations between neutrinos of different flavors.

Recently, new intriguing ideas and experimental techniques have been proposed to achieve a possible detection of these elusive particles. For example, hidden photons could be produced through kinetic mixing with solar photons. In this case, it would be possible to search for an hypothetical hidden photon flux from the Sun with Super-Kamiokande and with the CAST axion detector. The expected signature of hidden photons in Super-Kamiokande water Cherenkov detector is particularly intriguing. Since hidden photons, coming from the Sun, are long-lived noninteracting particles, they would penetrate the Earth shielding and oscillate into real photons in the vacuum space between the photomultiplier (PMT) envelope and the photocathode in Super-Kamiokande. The photon then would convert in the photocathode into a single photoelectron which would be detected by the PMT. This is not possible for hidden photons coming from the water tank, since the presence of the medium suppresses the hidden photon-photon oscillations. The result is an increase of the counting rate of those PMTs that are “illuminated” by the Sun from the back, in comparison to those facing the Sun.

Possible signatures of hidden photons could also be achieved analyzing the existing high-energy gamma-ray data taken with several Cherenkov telescopes. Also laser experiments, like ALPs, GammeV, BMV searching for light shining through walls, could discover hidden photons.

In 1983, Georgi, Ginsparg and Glashow, in Nature 306, 765 – 766 (22 December 1983), proposed the existence of a hidden photon mixing with the ordinary photons to explain the discrepancy between theoretical and observed CMB spectrum. After that time, measurements of CMB have reached an astonishing accuracy and no tension between theory and experiments remains. In particular, the Far Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer (FIRAS) on board of the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) confirmed the blackbody nature of the CMB spectrum at better than 1 part in 183. Constraining photon hidden photon oscillations via CMB. Therefore, CMB now is one of the most powerful probes used to constrain exotic physics. Any new particle beyond the standard model which can interact with photons can potentially distort the blackbody spectrum, providing us with a glimpse of the existence of such a particle. In this respect, the CMB provides an excellent probe for photon oscillations into low mass hidden photons, since the baseline is the longest at our disposal, namely the whole universe.

The purpose of our paper has been to revisit the CMB bounds on photons-hidden photons mixing using the most precise available observations of the CMB spectrum. The already existing constraints did not properly take into account the refractive properties of the primordial plasma in which photons propagate and were thus incomplete. These medium effects are especially important when we realize that a resonant photon-hidden photon conversion is possible, similar to the Mikheev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein effect in the neutrino case. This resonant conversion is much stronger than the vacuum oscillations considered so far and, therefore, the bounds we obtain are much stronger.

Requiring the distortions of the CMB induced by the photon-hidden photon mixing to be smaller than experimental upper limits, this leads to a bound on the mixing angle 183. Constraining photon hidden photon oscillations via CMB for hidden photon masses between 183. Constraining photon hidden photon oscillations via CMB eV and 183. Constraining photon hidden photon oscillations via CMB eV. This low-mass and low-mixing region of the hidden photon parameter space was previously unconstrained. As a result of our new bound, it is unlikely that hidden photons with masses smaller than 183. Constraining photon hidden photon oscillations via CMB eV can play a cosmological role. Conversely, for meV masses, resonant photon-hidden photon oscillations happen after nucleosynthesis but before CMB decoupling, increasing the effective number of neutrinos but also the baryon to photon ratio with interesting cosmological consequences. The mixing angles required for this effect could be probed in current laboratory experiments: Fiat (hidden) lux!

0 Comments

You can be the first one to leave a comment.

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.