NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

172. Color glass condensate and glasma

APPLIED, HEP-TH/PH — By Dmitry Podolsky on January 9, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

I am currently reading a paper that, I should admit, I absolutely fell in love with – the one by Larry McLerran called “A brief introduction to the color glass condensate“. What is the reason for me to show up warm feelings? This is because the concentration of non-trivial physical ideas per page is so enormously high in the paper, because the emphasis is on physics and physical ideas rather than on formalities or model building, and because Larry typically just shows you the tail of the idea hiding its body in references – this keeps my mind always focused (clearly, I don’t want to go through tones of references to understand what physics is about 172. Color glass condensate and glasma )


1. Dynamics of heavy ion collisions

Imagine two heavy Au ions colliding with each other at  ultrarelativistic velocities (that is what people do in Brookhaven all the time – collide Au ions). Both ions contain a very large number of neutrons and protons – in a sense, they can be visualized as large bulbs  filled with gas of neutrons and protons (the characteristic size of an ion is much much larger than the proton size), and interaction between the ions is essentially reduced to the interaction between protons and neutrons they consist of.

Since the kinetic energy of the ion is larger than 172. Color glass condensate and glasma, the deconfinement is to happen in the process of collision, and we are supposed to see the state called quark-gluon plasma (quarks are consituents of protons and neutrons, while gluons mediate strong interaction between quarks). Approximately after 10 fm/c (1 fm is the characterisitic size of small hadrons) the quark-gluon plasma is hadronized and we are again left with ultrarelativistic protons and neutrons. But what exactly happens between the moment of collision and the hadronization time? Can we say something more about the state of matter at these times? QG plasma is weakly coupled, since the energies are high – so we should be able to quanitatively treat the matter degrees of freedom by means of perturbation theory.

Real life, as it turns out, is not so simple. The main difficulty is that although the plasma is weakly coupled, occupation numbers of gluons are very high (in fact, non-perturbatively high as 172. Color glass condensate and glasma), so naive Boltzmann approximation for kinetic equation describing dynamics od these ossupation numbers is not applicable. Yet, we are able to say many things about evolution of fields at time scales shorter than 10 fm/c.

As it turns out, at 172. Color glass condensate and glasma fm/c the matter can be described as so called color glass condensate, while at later time scales 172. Color glass condensate and glasma fm/c it can be described as glasma 172. Color glass condensate and glasma The latter state is transformed into proper quark-gluon plasma only at 172. Color glass condensate and glasma fm/c. So,…

2. What is color glass condensate?

As we said, immediately after the collision, the number of gluons is non-perturbatively high (it is surely much higher than quark occupation numbers – the latter are fermions, so their occupation numbers are no higher than 1), and we can effectively forget about quarks all together and focus only on the dynamics of gluons.

Gluon occupation numbers become large due to non-perturbative particle production in the process of collision (fields become really strong in the process) – particles are especially effectively produced in the deep IR.  However, occupation numbers cannot be too large, since the backreaction of produced gluons becomes important (interaction between gluons is repulsive and has the order of magnitude 172. Color glass condensate and glasma) and shuts the particle production down. In practice, there exists a characteristic momentum scale 172. Color glass condensate and glasma such that occupation numbers are not to grow at 172. Color glass condensate and glasma. After particle production stops, distribution of gluons starts to slowly evolve towards the UV. The characteristic time scale of the dynamics of the distribution is of course 172. Color glass condensate and glasma.

What happens at 172. Color glass condensate and glasma? Gluons may still be produced there, but they see the IR gluon field with 172. Color glass condensate and glasma as the classical one (but stochastic, of course). That is why one talks about color glass – slowly evolving condensate of IR quasi-classical gluons.

3. What is glasma?

At later times, gluon distributions start to thermalize. As long as occupation numbers in the IR remain non-perturbatively large, the quantum state describing the gluons after collision remains coherent – phases of different IR gluon modes remain correlated. Some deep IR part of the distribution remains in this coherent state till the hadronization time. That is why the state of matter during this period is called Glasma – it is neither color glass condensate anymore (the correlation of phases started to break down already in the IR, and UV part of the distribution is a pure gluon plasma), nor the quark-gluon plasma (there is still noticeable coherence pattern in the IR).

4. What’s not so clear to me yet

Experimental data indicate that QG plasma is thermalized at very early times (definitely earlier than 10 fm/c, the hadronization time scale).  How and why this happens if there is still strong coherence pattern in the IR? Most probably, early thermalization automatically means that randomization of phases and breakdown of coherence pattern in the IR happens really early (I would say – as early as 1 fm/c after the collision). RHIC experts, who read this blog, could you kindly comment on this? Does glasma really have a time window to exist?

6 Comments

  1. Lubos Motl says:
    January 10, 2009 at 9:01 am

    Hi Dmitry! Did all occurrences of “fm/s” went to be meant “fm/c” where “c” is the speed of light? If not, what is fm/s as a unit of time?

    Unfortunately, I didn’t quite understand what a color glass condensate (and glasma) is, even though you made a good job in saying where it is (the context) and what it is not. ;-)

    Would you mind inserting a real definition into your text? Thanks a bucket.

    Reply
  2. Dmitry says:
    January 10, 2009 at 9:53 am

    Dear Lubos,

    Yes, everything was in units fm/c. Thanks a lot!

    Dmitry.

    Reply
  3. ervin goldfain says:
    January 10, 2009 at 10:38 am

    Dmitry,

    Is it possible that some sort of absorbing phase transition (APT)occurs at very short times in glasma? This phase transition may be able to sustain coherence of gluon plasma and prevent thermalization beyond the hadronization time scale. It is known that APT drives components in reaction-diffusion processes to fall into absorbing states where thermal fluctuations are strongly suppresed. Your thoughts?

    Regards,

    Ervin

    Reply
  4. Dmitry says:
    January 10, 2009 at 11:08 pm

    Hi Ervin

    I think, you want to say that intermediate time behavior of gluon distribution functions is described by dynamical RG fixed point. I have no idea – maybe yes, maybe no, anyway, already at 10 fm/c hadronization happens and almost all information about this early stage is lost.

    My impression is that QGP is not thermalized completely (at least not at short time scales I am talking about), instead, instead, what is called prethermalization happens:
    gluon occupation numbers are still extremely high at t\sim{}1 fm/c, Boltzmann exponential tail is definitely not what is seen. On the other hand, gluon distribution function can be approximately described by Rayleigh-Jeans, so a kind of effective temperature is present in the system – this is what I meant by prethermalization. The nice thing is that prethermalization
    (contrary to full thermalization) does not automatically imply that coherence pattern in the IR breaks down.

    Cheers,
    Dmitry.

    Reply
  5. ervin goldfain says:
    January 11, 2009 at 1:18 am

    Hi Dmitry,

    But if information is lost at 10 fm/c already, how can one prove that prethermalization actually takes place and phase coherence of QGP is still unbroken? Is there experimental evidence for the Rayleigh-Jeans distribution function or is it just a working hypothesis regarding what happens prior to hadronization?

    Regards,

    Ervin

    Reply
  6. Dmitry says:
    January 11, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    Hi Ervin

    I don’t think that anybody is able to measure gluon distribution function at these time scales, so yes, Rayleigh-Jeans is working hypothesis. What is observed in particular is the effective equation of state of the QGP, which reaches its equilibrium value at early times.

    Cheers,
    Dmitry.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.