NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

16. Eye on ArXiv: 10 Apr 2008 – NG in ekpyrotic models, quantum noise as entanglement meter

ASTRO, COND-MAT — By Dmitry Podolsky on April 10, 2008 at 1:25 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

1. Jean-Luc Lehners, Paul J. Steinhardt, “Intuitive understanding of non-gaussianity in ekpyrotic and cyclic models”

As you may remember, ekpyrotic scenario predicts much higher level of primordial non-gaussianity than single field inflationary scenarios. The technical reason for this is more or less that the level of nongaussianity

16. Eye on ArXiv: 10 Apr 2008   NG in ekpyrotic models, quantum noise as entanglement meter

for a single field inflation is proportional to the slow roll parameter 16. Eye on ArXiv: 10 Apr 2008   NG in ekpyrotic models, quantum noise as entanglement meter, while for a elpyrotic scenario it is inversely proportional to 16. Eye on ArXiv: 10 Apr 2008   NG in ekpyrotic models, quantum noise as entanglement meter. This feature of the ekpyrotic scenario seems especially attractive in light of recent Yadav-Wandelt estimation of primordial nongaussianity

16. Eye on ArXiv: 10 Apr 2008   NG in ekpyrotic models, quantum noise as entanglement meter at the 95% CL

(let me remind that for a single field inflation 16. Eye on ArXiv: 10 Apr 2008   NG in ekpyrotic models, quantum noise as entanglement meter, and this is model independent prediction).

In the present paper, the authors show that there is typically a contribution to 16. Eye on ArXiv: 10 Apr 2008   NG in ekpyrotic models, quantum noise as entanglement meter determined by geometric mean of the effective equation of state (EOS) during the ekpyrotic phase and during the phase when curvature perturbations are generated, which is the source of the largeness of 16. Eye on ArXiv: 10 Apr 2008   NG in ekpyrotic models, quantum noise as entanglement meter in ekpyrotic scenarios. Basically, one can say that nongaussianity is large 16. Eye on ArXiv: 10 Apr 2008   NG in ekpyrotic models, quantum noise as entanglement meter during the ekpyrotic phase, and self interactions of the scalar field are strong (compare it to inflationary stage, where self interactions of the scalar field are suppressed by the slow roll parameter).

2. Israel Klich, Leonid Levitov, “Quantum Noise as an Entanglement Meter”

This is a cond-mat preprint and I excuse my writing about it by the fact that 1) I have learned diagrammatic methods by working through Levitov’s great book and 2) the paper is about entanglement entropy 16. Eye on ArXiv: 10 Apr 2008   NG in ekpyrotic models, quantum noise as entanglement meter I don’t need to expain to you how the notion entanglement entropy is important in, say, black hole physics or inflation.

In the paper, authors actually identify a condensed matter system where entanglement entropy can be measured experimentally (!!)

The system is a quantum point contact (QPC), serving as a door between two electron reservoirs, which can be opened and closed when necessary. As authors show, fluctuations of electric current through the QPC can be used to quantify the entanglement generated by the connection, i.e., to measure the entanglement entropy directly.

1 Comment

  1. Instanton says:
    April 13, 2008 at 8:08 am

    Hi
    Regarding paper by Steinhardt I still dont get what is new compared to what is alredy known

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.