Recent posts: D. Cubero. Thermal equilibrium in special relativity
Powered by MaxBlogPress 

156. Again about condensed matter applications of AdS-CFT

Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF                                


Peter Horava has recently released a somewhat mysterious paper about non-relativistic Yang-Mills theories. Since I was unable to understand why one should be ultimately interested to consider such exotic beasts (that is, non-relativistic YM theories), I decided to postpone the reading until understanding will eventually appear due to background work of my brain :-)

Understanding of the motivation came after I stumbled upon Balasubramanian-McGreevy PRL paper and Son’s paper on AdS/cold atoms correspondence and realized that what those people ultimately want is to construct a kind of AdS/CFT applicable to condensed matter systems (we have recently discussed AdS/CFT applicability to condensed matter systems). More accurately, the ultimate goal is to find (if it even exists, of course) a gravity dual to a non-relativistic system with conformal invariance (I don’t want to say “described by CFT”, because CFT means conformal field theory, that is, relativistic theory by definition; non-relativistic limit of a field theory is given by quantum mechanics).

One example of non-relativistic systems with scaling symmetries is the theories with quantum critical points. The latter means that a second order phase transition is achieved by changing couplings at zero temperature. Often, correlators of observables in theories with quantum critical points scale differently along x and t directions – so effective relativistic invariance near the critical point is broken (for details, see Sachdev’s book on quantum phase transitions).

Another example of a non-relativistic system with scaling invariance is so called cold fermions at unitarity. What is it, exactly? Consider non-interacting fermions

L_1=i\psi^\dagger\partial_t{}\psi-\frac{1}{2m}|\nabla\psi|^2 (1)

and add a source coupled to the dimer \psi_{\rm up}\psi_{\rm down}, so that

L=L_1+\phi^*\psi_{\rm up}\psi_{\rm down}+\phi\psi_{\rm down}^\dagger\psi_{\rm up}^\dagger.(2)

The theory (2) is called “fermions at unitarity” since s-wave scattering cross section between two fermions saturates the unitarity bound. This theory is UV complete in the physically interesting situation d=3. Another interesting feature of the theory is that the Lagrangian (2) (as well as the Lagrangian (1) describing free fermions) is symmetric w.r.t. the Schroedinger group – a non-relativistic analogue of the conformal group (there is in particular one special conformal transformation in the group).

Ultimately, one is looking for higher-dimensional gravity system described by some non-trivial metric that would have a similar Schroedinger (well, at least Galilean) group symmetry at the boundary. If we are able to find one, we can analyze it and try to figure out what kind of universality class does it correspond to on the non-relativistic quantum mechanical side. In particular, we may expect to find new universality classes theories with quantum critical point may belong to, and this, I think, may very well be the only physical purpose of discussing non-Abelian YM theories.

  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

If you liked the post, please kindly consider to leave a comment, subscribe to the RSS feed or get new posts sent directly to your Inbox. If you want to chat with me in real time, you can find me on Twitter. The posts below are probably related to the subject of this one:

Physics reading
134. Cosmic strings – simple and nice introduction into the topic
366. Some interesting recent papers in Arxiv
198. Fractional quantum Hall effect – a few words about theory
94. Quantum scale invariance on the lattice

RSS feed | Trackback URI

Comments »

No comments yet.

Please, enter your name (required)
e-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
or login via Facebook by clicking the button below
Your comment (smaller size | larger size)
For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

« Back to text comment
or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post