<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 117. Recent lattice QCD simulations &#8211; how good is QCD in the infrared?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonequilibrium.net/117-lattice-qcd-simulations-good-qcd-infrared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/117-lattice-qcd-simulations-good-qcd-infrared/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>For physicts by physicists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/117-lattice-qcd-simulations-good-qcd-infrared/comment-page-1/#comment-3081</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=540#comment-3081</guid>
		<description>Dear Ervin

No, what I want to say is that QCD &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; the theory correctly describing not only UV physics of strong interactions (k\gg \Lambda_QCD) but IR physics as well, i.e., it is not necessary to change the QCD Lagrangian at scales k\ll \Lambda_QCD, as lattice QCD simulations show. 

However, &lt;em&gt;theoretical&lt;/em&gt; understanding of IR behavior of QCD is essentially absent at this point. 

Cheers,
Dmitry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Ervin</p>
<p>No, what I want to say is that QCD <em>is</em> the theory correctly describing not only UV physics of strong interactions (k\gg \Lambda_QCD) but IR physics as well, i.e., it is not necessary to change the QCD Lagrangian at scales k\ll \Lambda_QCD, as lattice QCD simulations show. </p>
<p>However, <em>theoretical</em> understanding of IR behavior of QCD is essentially absent at this point. </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dmitry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ervin</title>
		<link>http://www.nonequilibrium.net/117-lattice-qcd-simulations-good-qcd-infrared/comment-page-1/#comment-3034</link>
		<dc:creator>Ervin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonequilibrium.net/?p=540#comment-3034</guid>
		<description>Dear Dmitry,

Is your message that we now fully understand the theory behind infrared QCD? Are you saying that lattice QCD is a good-enough computational tool and theorists should not spend any further effort in understanding the physics of infrared QCD?

Best regards,

Ervin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dmitry,</p>
<p>Is your message that we now fully understand the theory behind infrared QCD? Are you saying that lattice QCD is a good-enough computational tool and theorists should not spend any further effort in understanding the physics of infrared QCD?</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Ervin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

